Assetto Corsa

Assetto Corsa, the 2014 racing simulation, remains a staple for benchmarking due to its demanding physics and rendering. The measured data for the Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 provides a clear picture of how this combination handles the game across various resolutions and settings. The results show a system that scales predictably with resolution, revealing a GPU that is well-matched to the CPU at lower settings but becomes the primary limiting factor as visual fidelity increases.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant for this combo, and the pattern strongly indicates a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 204.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 87.6 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 117 FPS, or roughly 57%. This steep decline is a classic sign that the rendering load on the Arc B580 is increasing faster than its processing capabilities can keep up, despite the CPU having ample headroom.

The scaling trend is consistent across all settings. At Medium, the average FPS drops from 145.5 at 1080p to 99.4 at 1440p and then to 60.4 at 4K. The gap between 1440p and 4K remains large, which suggests the GPU's memory bandwidth and shader throughput are being saturated. Even at High settings, the drop from 105.9 FPS at 1080p to 74.6 FPS at 1440p and finally to 48.2 FPS at 4K shows a linear progression of performance loss. The most demanding Ultra preset tells the same story: 90.6 FPS at 1080p, 62.4 FPS at 1440p, and a barely playable 36.2 FPS at 4K.

This data implies that the limiting component is almost exclusively the GPU. The Intel Core i5-13400F, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, is likely not the bottleneck here, as evidenced by the very high frame rates achieved at 1080p. The fact that frame rates drop so dramatically when the pixel count increases points to the Arc B580's rendering capabilities, not the CPU's ability to feed it data, being the deciding factor in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand context of all tested combinations, this system holds a specific position. The data shows a combo rank of 1346 out of 1721 tested combos for Assetto Corsa. This percentile placement indicates that while this is not a top-tier configuration for this sim, it is also far from the bottom. It suggests that a significant majority of other CPU/GPU pairings tested are capable of producing higher average frame rates in this specific game.

This ranking is likely influenced by the GPU's position in the overall hierarchy. The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021 and sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which scores 23181, a delta of -0.7%, and the AMD Radeon 760M, which scores 22999, a delta of 0.1%. The performance of this combo is therefore very much in line with these mid-range cards. The CPU, on the other hand, is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, scoring 25236 on average, which is a higher relative standing. The combo's rank of 1346 likely reflects that many other tested systems have paired stronger GPUs with comparable CPUs, pushing them ahead in a graphics-intensive title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution. For a smooth 60 FPS experience, the data shows that at 4K, the Medium preset is the maximum viable option, delivering an average of 60.4 FPS. The High preset at 4K drops to 48.2 FPS, which may be acceptable for some but is below the standard for fast-paced racing.

At 1440p, the user has more flexibility. The High preset achieves an average of 74.6 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset at 1440p is also playable at 62.4 FPS, though the jump from High to Ultra may not be worth the 12 FPS cost. For those seeking maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1440p yields 141.1 FPS, but this sacrifices too much visual fidelity for the extra speed.

For 1080p gaming, the system is clearly overqualified at lower settings. The Low preset at 1080p produces an average of 204.6 FPS, and the Medium preset reaches 145.5 FPS. However, the most balanced recommendation at 1080p is the High preset, which delivers 105.9 FPS. This provides excellent visual detail while still maintaining a frame rate high enough for any display. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also smooth at 90.6 FPS, making it the best choice for those who prioritize image quality above all else at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to hit 60 FPS on High settings?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 74.6. This is the highest resolution where the High preset maintains an average above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset drops to an average of 48.2 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Assetto Corsa at 4K?

A: Yes, but with compromises. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 is 87.6 on Low, 60.4 on Medium, 48.2 on High, and 36.2 on Ultra. To achieve a playable 60 FPS, the Medium preset is the highest setting that can be used.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 4060 in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has a score of 23181, which is a delta of -0.7% relative to the Arc B580. This indicates they are very closely matched in general performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this game?

A: The resolution scaling data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. Frame rates drop significantly when moving from 1080p to 4K. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile, implying the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p on Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset is 90.6.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 141.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves an average of 62.4 FPS. This represents a performance drop of 78.7 FPS when switching from the lowest to the highest visual preset.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is the decisive factor in this combo's gaming performance. Its specifications include 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is likely sufficient for Assetto Corsa at all tested resolutions, as the game is not known for being extremely VRAM-hungry. The data shows that the GPU's raw compute power, with an FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS, is what limits high-resolution performance.

The GPU's clock speed is fixed at a boost of 2670 MHz, which is consistent across its operation. The benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 15748 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821. Its percentile rank of 66 places it in the mid-range tier of graphics cards. In this game, the 48.2 FPS at 4K High and 36.2 FPS at 4K Ultra are direct results of the GPU's compute and fillrate limits. The data indicates that the Arc B580 is a capable 1080p and 1440p card for this title, but it is not designed for maximum settings at 4K. The GPU's 20 RT cores are present, but their impact on this older title is negligible.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides a solid foundation for this gaming system. With 10 cores and 16 threads, it offers substantial multi-threaded capability, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21279 and Passmark multi-thread score of 25032. The CPU's single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3004, which is crucial for simulation games that often rely on a single main logic thread.

In Assetto Corsa, the CPU's role appears to be supportive, ensuring that the GPU is fed with enough data to reach its potential. The high frame rates at 1080p Low (204.6 FPS) show that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions where the GPU has an easier time. The CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory likely help in maintaining stable frame pacing. Its 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its proximity to rivals like the Intel Core i7-13620H (deltaPct 0.1%), confirms that it is a high-performing processor. The data suggests that in this specific game, the CPU has enough headroom to handle the physics and AI calculations without impacting the frame rate, even at higher settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for this combo:

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 87.6 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.4 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 48.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 141.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 99.4 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 74.6 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 62.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 204.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 145.5 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 105.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.6 |

The progression from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent penalty for each step up in resolution. At Low settings, the jump from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by 63.5, and from 1440p to 4K by another 53.5. This suggests the GPU is being pushed progressively harder. The data also shows that the cost of moving from Medium to High is significant; for example, at 1440p, it costs 24.8 FPS, while the move from High to Ultra costs only 12.2 FPS. This indicates that the Ultra preset's additional visual effects are not as demanding as the step up from Medium to High. Overall, these measured numbers provide a comprehensive guide to what users can expect from this hardware combination.