Archeage

Archeage

AVERAGE FPS
67
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 67 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 31 43 54
1440p QHD 40 58 80 91
1080p Full HD 55 80 122 134

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Ultra 21
2560x1440 Low 91
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 High 58
2560x1440 Ultra 40
1920x1080 Low 134
1920x1080 Medium 122
1920x1080 High 80
1920x1080 Ultra 55

Archeage with AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination delivers a wide spread of frame rates in Archeage, ranging from a playable 134.4 FPS at 1080p Low to a demanding 20.5 FPS at 4K Ultra. The data reveals a system where the graphics card is the primary scaling factor, with the CPU providing a stable foundation that rarely becomes the main constraint. This analysis interprets the measured FPS rows to understand how resolution and settings interact, what the experience implies for configuration, and where this specific pairing sits in the broader hierarchy of tested hardware.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and dramatic decline as resolution increases, indicating that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the dominant limiting component in this configuration. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings results in a drop from 79.7 FPS to 58.1 FPS, a reduction of roughly 27%. The jump to 3840x2160 at High settings is far more punishing, with the average FPS collapsing to 31.0, a 61% decrease from the 1440p figure and a 61% decrease from the 1080p figure. This steep curve at the higher resolution tier suggests the GPU’s pixel-pushing capabilities, tied to its 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128-bit bus, are saturated quickly.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets, confirming the GPU-bound nature of the system. At Low settings, the 1080p result of 134.4 FPS falls to 90.5 FPS at 1440p (a 33% drop) and then to 54.2 FPS at 4K (a 40% drop from 1440p). The scaling from 1440p to 4K is less severe in percentage terms at Low settings than at High settings, which implies that at lower graphical loads, the CPU begins to exert a more noticeable influence on the frame rate, preventing the GPU from being the sole bottleneck. The data suggests that for a smooth 60 FPS experience, 1440p is the practical ceiling for this pairing, as the High preset at that resolution manages 58.1 FPS, while the 4K High result of 31.0 FPS is firmly in slideshow territory.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows indicate that the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience at 1080p and 1440p, providing a significant performance uplift over High while retaining a reasonable level of visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 122.0 FPS, which is 53% higher than the High preset’s 79.7 FPS and only 9% lower than the Low preset’s 134.4 FPS. This makes Medium the clear choice for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it sits comfortably above the 100 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset’s 79.5 FPS is still well above the 60 FPS target, offering a smooth experience that High cannot match (58.1 FPS).

The Ultra preset is not recommended for this combination, as it imposes a severe performance penalty at every resolution. At 1080p, Ultra yields 54.7 FPS, which is 55% slower than Medium. At 1440p, the Ultra result of 39.7 FPS approaches unplayable territory for an MMORPG, and at 4K, the 20.5 FPS average makes the game effectively static. For users prioritizing visual quality, the High preset at 1080p (79.7 FPS) is a viable option, but the data clearly shows that the Medium preset is the sweet spot, offering the best frame rate per unit of graphical investment. The Low preset, while providing the highest frame rates, is likely to introduce distracting visual pop-in and reduced detail, making it less desirable for a game where immersion is key.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, appears to be more than sufficient for Archeage, as the frame rate scaling is overwhelmingly tied to the GPU. The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18309 and a single-core score of 2584, placing it in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-11700F, show an aggregate benchmark delta of only -0.9%, indicating that the 5600 is not a performance outlier in either direction.

The 3DMark thread scaling results are particularly telling for gaming workloads. The single-thread score of 882 and the 2-thread score of 1737 suggest that the CPU’s per-core performance is strong, which is crucial for MMO titles that often rely on a primary game thread. However, the jump to 4 threads (3313) and 8 threads (4798) shows that the CPU scales well with additional cores, providing headroom for background tasks and game server communication. The fact that the 1080p Low preset achieves 134.4 FPS, only 13% higher than the 1440p Low result of 90.5 FPS, suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s limits are reached quickly. The data implies that a stronger CPU would not yield significant gains in this specific pairing, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck at all but the lowest settings and resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this hardware combo in Archeage?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 134.4, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system run Archeage at 4K resolution with playable frame rates?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the High preset averages 31.0 FPS, Medium averages 43.4 FPS, and Low averages 54.2 FPS. Only the Low preset approaches a playable 60 FPS, while Ultra is not viable at 20.5 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11700F?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 21765, which is 0.9% lower than the Intel Core i7-11700F's score of 21957. This indicates near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: What is the performance difference between the RX 7600 XT and the non-XT RX 7600?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600's score of 20258. The performance delta is minimal.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this system?

A: The measured FPS data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The frame rate drops heavily with resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario, while the CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest it has ample headroom.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the decisive factor in this system's Archeage performance, as evidenced by the steep FPS decline across increasing resolutions. The GPU’s specifications, including 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are central to its behavior. The 16 GB frame buffer is notably large, which likely prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor even at 4K Ultra, yet the compute throughput is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at that resolution. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 20146 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, and its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 460, is only 0.3% faster, suggesting the 7600 XT is a mid-pack performer.

The clocks, with a boost of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz, are high, but the 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute figure and 64 ROPs are the likely constraints. At 1080p, the GPU delivers a solid 79.7 FPS on High, but this falls to 31.0 FPS at 4K, illustrating the classic pixel-fill rate and memory bandwidth limitations. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at 4K (54.2 FPS vs 20.5 FPS) shows that the GPU’s shader units are overwhelmed by the increased detail and effects, while the memory bus struggles to feed them. The data suggests that the RX 7600 XT is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but it lacks the raw power for 4K gaming in a demanding MMO like Archeage.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest performance. The Low preset leads with 134.4 FPS, followed by Medium at 122.0 FPS, High at 79.7 FPS, and Ultra at 54.7 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is substantial (42.3 FPS), while the drop from Medium to Low is a smaller 12.4 FPS, indicating that the High preset introduces a significant graphical load. Moving to 2560x1440, the order remains the same, but the values compress. Low averages 90.5 FPS, Medium 79.5 FPS, High 58.1 FPS, and Ultra 39.7 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is most pronounced at Low settings (a 43.9 FPS loss), while the High preset loses 21.6 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance falls off a cliff. Low is the only preset that remains semi-playable at 54.2 FPS, with Medium at 43.4 FPS and High at 31.0 FPS. Ultra is effectively unplayable at 20.5 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe for all presets, with the Medium preset losing 36.1 FPS and the High preset losing 27.1 FPS. This data points to a hard wall for the GPU at 4K, where even the lowest settings cannot consistently maintain 60 FPS. The measured rows clearly define the performance envelope: 1080p Medium is the ideal target for high refresh rates, 1440p Medium is the best balance for clarity and smoothness, and 4K is only suitable for Low settings at around 54 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations for Archeage, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1094th out of 1727 total combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a surprising result given the component specifications. The rank suggests that while the individual components are competent, the combination is not optimized for this specific game’s engine, or that the game’s performance ceiling is lower than the hardware’s potential.

The rank of 1094 out of 1727 means that roughly 63% of tested combos perform better than this one in Archeage. This is a notable finding, as it implies that many other CPU and GPU pairings achieve higher frame rates. The data suggests that the RX 7600 XT, despite its modern RDNA 3.0 architecture and 16 GB of VRAM, is not a strong performer in this title when paired with the Ryzen 5 5600. The GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs is higher than the combo’s 37th percentile ranking, indicating that the CPU pairing may be holding back the GPU’s potential, or that other combos with similar GPUs are paired with stronger CPUs that drive higher frame rates at lower resolutions. This position implies that users with this combo should target 1080p or 1440p Medium settings to achieve a satisfying experience, as the hardware is not competitive at the higher end of the performance spectrum in Archeage.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2755 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Archeage

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.2
3840x2160 Medium 43.4
3840x2160 High 31.0
3840x2160 Ultra 20.5
2560x1440 Low 90.5
2560x1440 Medium 79.5
2560x1440 High 58.1
2560x1440 Ultra 39.7
1920x1080 Low 134.4
1920x1080 Medium 122.0
1920x1080 High 79.7
1920x1080 Ultra 54.7

Archeage with Ryzen 5 5600 + Other GPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Archeage with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600 + RX 7600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.