Allods Online

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-R family, built on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, and it carries 20 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, with a Geekbench single-core result of 2058. The processor sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32279.

In Allods Online, an MMORPG from 2010, the CPU's role is substantial but not always the primary constraint. The measured frame rates show that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 257 FPS, which is extremely high and suggests the CPU is feeding the GPU efficiently. However, the delta between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is telling: from 257 FPS down to 140 FPS, a drop of 117 FPS. This indicates that while the i5-14400F can push high frame rates, the game's engine at higher settings imposes a significant load that the CPU must manage, especially considering the game's age and likely single-threaded or lightly-threaded nature.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (delta +0.1%), Intel Core i9-11900 (delta +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (delta -0.2%), and Intel Core i7-12800H (delta +0.5%). These deltas are all within half a percent, meaning the i5-14400F's compute performance is virtually identical to those parts. For a game like Allods Online, which may rely on single-core performance for game logic and network handling, the i5-14400F's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3055 is a strong indicator of its ability to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 4080 in less demanding scenes.

The absence of min FPS data for most measured rows (only Medium settings have min/max values) means we cannot fully assess frame pacing. But the data we have shows that at 1080p Medium, the min FPS is 200 and max is 270, with an average of 235. This suggests the CPU can hold a comfortable frame rate even under load, though the game's age means it may not leverage all 16 threads. The i5-14400F's 10 cores (likely 6 performance and 4 efficiency cores, though the pack does not specify the split) provide ample headroom for background tasks, but Allods Online's threading model is likely the limiting factor rather than raw core count.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 2205 MHz, boosting to 2505 MHz, with memory running at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). It has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The card posts a Passmark G3D score of 34457 and sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247.

In Allods Online, the RTX 4080's role is heavily dependent on resolution and settings. At 4K Ultra, the combo only manages 46 FPS, which is surprisingly low for such a powerful GPU. This suggests the game's engine, released in 2010, may not be well-optimized for modern hardware at extreme settings. The GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 SUPER (delta +0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (delta -1.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (delta -2.6%), and AMD Radeon 8060S (delta -2.7%). The RTX 4080's performance is within 2.7% of these parts, but the game's frame rates are more influenced by settings than raw GPU capability.

The 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for Allods Online, which is an older MMORPG not known for high-resolution textures. At 4K High, the combo achieves 73 FPS, which is playable but not stellar. The drop from High to Ultra at 4K is dramatic: from 73 FPS to 46 FPS, a 37% reduction. This indicates that the Ultra preset likely enables effects that are computationally expensive without proportional visual benefit, possibly due to the game's age and lack of modern GPU optimizations.

The RTX 4080's 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance are far beyond what Allods Online requires, yet the measured FPS at 4K Ultra shows the GPU is not the bottleneck—the game engine is. The GPU's compute capabilities, as measured by Passmark GPU Compute (20671), suggest it can handle massive workloads, but the game's draw calls and scene complexity at Ultra settings overwhelm the CPU and engine, not the GPU itself.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Allods Online with this combo for a balanced experience?

A: Based on measured data, 1440p High yields 140 FPS, which is smooth and visually detailed. 1080p Ultra also achieves 140 FPS, but 1440p High is likely more visually immersive at the same frame rate.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900. It is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800H.

Q: What GPU settings should be avoided at 4K?

A: At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 46 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. 4K Medium is a better choice at 116 FPS, or 4K High at 73 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 4080's performance consistent with its rivals?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54247 is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER, 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, 2.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and 2.7% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, Low settings produce 257 FPS, while Ultra produces 140 FPS. This is a 117 FPS difference, indicating that Ultra settings place a heavy load on the system.

Q: Does the combo provide playable frame rates at all resolutions?

A: Yes, all measured configurations exceed 46 FPS. The lowest frame rate is 46 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still technically playable but not ideal. All other configurations exceed 73 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings average 257 FPS, Medium averages 235 FPS with a minimum of 200 and maximum of 270, High averages 196 FPS, and Ultra averages 140 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline: 257 → 235 → 196 → 140. This represents a 45.5% drop from Low to Ultra. The Medium setting's min FPS of 200 is notably high, suggesting the system maintains smooth performance even under load at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show a clear step down. Low settings average 220 FPS, Medium averages 202 FPS with a minimum of 171 and maximum of 232, High averages 140 FPS, and Ultra averages 88 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 132 FPS, a 60% reduction. The Medium setting's min FPS of 171 is still above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on many monitors, making this a viable configuration for high-refresh gaming.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop more dramatically, particularly at higher settings. Low settings average 149 FPS, Medium averages 116 FPS with a minimum of 99 and maximum of 134, High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 46 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 103 FPS, a 69% reduction. Ultra at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, making it the least desirable option. Medium at 4K, with an average of 116 FPS and a minimum of 99, is the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the frame rate penalty for higher settings becomes more pronounced. At 1080p, Ultra is 54.5% of Low's performance. At 1440p, Ultra is 40% of Low's performance. At 4K, Ultra is 30.9% of Low's performance. This suggests that the game's Ultra preset scales poorly with resolution, likely due to inefficient rendering techniques that disproportionately impact higher pixel counts.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 382nd out of 3670 tested combos in Allods Online. This places it in the top 10.4% of all configurations tested for this game. Given the power of both components, one might expect a higher rank, but the game's age and potential CPU-limited nature at high frame rates likely suppress the combo's standing relative to more modern, well-optimized titles.

The rank of 382 out of 3670 means this combo outperforms approximately 89.6% of tested configurations. However, the measured FPS data suggests that the RTX 4080 is often underutilized, particularly at lower resolutions and settings. For example, at 1080p Low, the system achieves 257 FPS, which is likely far beyond the monitor's refresh rate for most users, meaning the GPU is not the limiting factor. The CPU, while capable, may not be able to feed the GPU fast enough to achieve even higher frame rates in this specific game.

The combo's ranking is likely influenced by the fact that Allods Online is an older MMORPG that may not scale well with modern hardware. The RTX 4080's raw power is evident in synthetic benchmarks (86th percentile among all GPUs), but the game's engine may not translate that power into proportional frame rates, especially at 4K Ultra where the combo only manages 46 FPS. This rank of 382 suggests that other combos, possibly with more powerful CPUs or better-optimized configurations, achieve higher frame rates in this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, High settings at 196 FPS provide a strong balance between visual quality and performance, exceeding the refresh rate of most 144 Hz monitors. Ultra at 140 FPS is still very playable but offers diminishing returns for the 56 FPS loss compared to High. Medium at 235 FPS is ideal for 240 Hz monitors, with a min FPS of 200 ensuring no drops below the panel's refresh rate.

At 1440p, High settings at 140 FPS is the sweet spot, matching the common 144 Hz refresh rate. Medium at 202 FPS is better suited for 240 Hz displays, with a min FPS of 171 remaining above the 144 Hz threshold. Ultra at 88 FPS is playable but may not fully utilize high-refresh displays. Low at 220 FPS is unnecessary unless competing in a scenario where maximum frame rate is paramount.

At 4K, the choice is more constrained. Medium settings at 116 FPS is the best option, providing a smooth experience on 120 Hz displays with a min FPS of 99 ensuring no significant stutters. High at 73 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz displays but may feel less smooth on higher refresh panels. Ultra at 46 FPS is not recommended due to the sub-60 FPS average. Low at 149 FPS is an option for competitive play but sacrifices visual fidelity significantly.

Overall, the data suggests that Medium settings provide the best experience at all resolutions, offering the highest frame rates that still maintain visual quality. The Medium preset at 1440p (202 FPS) and 4K (116 FPS) both have documented min FPS values (171 and 99 respectively), indicating reliable frame pacing. High settings are a reasonable alternative for users prioritizing visuals over raw frame rate, but the jump from Medium to High incurs a 15-37% performance penalty depending on resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights into the system's bottleneck. At Low settings, the frame rates decline from 257 FPS at 1080p to 220 FPS at 1440p (a 14.4% drop) and further to 149 FPS at 4K (a 42.0% drop from 1080p). This scaling is relatively gentle, suggesting that at Low settings, the GPU is not heavily stressed and the CPU remains the primary limiter, especially at lower resolutions.

At Medium settings, the decline is steeper: 235 FPS at 1080p drops to 202 FPS at 1440p (a 14.0% drop) and 116 FPS at 4K (a 50.6% drop from 1080p). The 4K figure represents a significant reduction, indicating that the GPU begins to become more involved at this resolution, but the CPU still has headroom.

At High settings, the scaling is more pronounced: 196 FPS at 1080p drops to 140 FPS at 1440p (a 28.6% drop) and 73 FPS at 4K (a 62.8% drop from 1080p). The steep decline at 4K suggests the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, as the RTX 4080's capabilities are being tested by the increased pixel count and the game's inefficient rendering at higher settings.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is extreme: 140 FPS at 1080p drops to 88 FPS at 1440p (a 37.1% drop) and 46 FPS at 4K (a 67.1% drop from 1080p). The 4K figure is less than one-third of the 1080p performance, indicating that the Ultra preset places an enormous load on the system at high resolutions, likely due to unoptimized shaders or excessive draw calls.

The data indicates a clear shift in the limiting component as resolution increases. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU (i5-14400F) is more likely the bottleneck, as frame rates are high but the GPU is not fully utilized. At 4K, particularly with High and Ultra settings, the GPU (RTX 4080) becomes the limiting factor, as the frame rates drop dramatically despite the CPU's capabilities. The game's engine, released in 2010, appears to scale poorly with modern GPU power at high resolutions, making the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth insufficient to overcome the engine's inefficiencies at 4K Ultra.