Intel Xeon L5410
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
ECC MemoryAt a Glance
IntelIntel Xeon L5410 Specifications
Xeon L5410 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Xeon L5410 features 4 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
L5410 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon L5410 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon L5410 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Xeon L5410 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the L5410 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon L5410's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Core 2 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Xeon L5410 is built on Intel's 45 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in L5410 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Core 2 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Xeon L5410 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
L5410 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Xeon L5410 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 50W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 771 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Xeon L5410 uses the Intel Socket 771 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 771 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the L5410 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon L5410 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Xeon L5410 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Xeon L5410 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon L5410 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Xeon L5410 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Xeon L5410 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performerscinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Xeon L5410. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Xeon L5410. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Xeon L5410 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Xeon L5410 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About Intel Xeon L5410
The Intel Xeon L5410 is a 4-core, 4-thread server processor from the Harpertown generation, built on Intel's 45 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 2.33 GHz with no boost capability, and its benchmark results place it in the 10th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a legacy part that modern systems have largely surpassed. Its average benchmark score of 542 points aligns it with entry-level desktop processors from over a decade ago, making it relevant today only for specific low-power or retro server applications.
How It Compares
The Xeon L5410’s average benchmark score of 542 is exactly matched by the Intel Core i3-2100, with a deltaPct of 0. This means the two processors deliver statistically identical multi-threaded performance in aggregate benchmarks. The i3-2100 is a Sandy Bridge desktop chip from 2011, so this parity highlights that the older Xeon’s 45 nm architecture still holds its own against a much newer mainstream part in raw throughput, though the i3 offers superior per-clock efficiency and modern instruction set support.
Against the Intel Celeron 3965U, the L5410 trails by 0.2% (543 vs. 542 average score). The Celeron is a low-power mobile chip from the Kaby Lake era, yet it edges out the Xeon in this comparison. This narrow margin suggests the L5410 is competitive with even ultra-low-voltage parts in general workloads, but the Celeron achieves this with far lower power consumption and a much newer platform, making the Xeon’s performance parity less impressive in practical terms.
The Intel Core i5-540M scores 544, which is 0.3% higher than the L5410’s 542. The i5-540M is a dual-core mobile processor with Hyper-Threading from the Arrandale generation. Despite having fewer physical cores, it slightly outperforms the Xeon in the average benchmark metric, likely due to higher clock speeds and better single-thread efficiency. This shows that core count alone does not guarantee superiority; the Xeon’s 4 cores are effectively matched by a 2-core/4-thread part from a similar era.
The Intel Core i3-4100E is the only rival that the L5410 leads, with a deltaPct of 0.4% (540 vs. 542). The i3-4100E is a Haswell-based embedded processor, and the Xeon’s small victory here is notable because the i3 is several generations newer. However, the 0.4% margin is negligible and falls within run-to-run variance, so this should be interpreted as a tie rather than a real advantage. The L5410’s performance class is firmly in the entry-level range, regardless of which rival it is measured against.
Power and Thermals
The L5410 has a TDP of 50 watts, which is remarkably low for a quad-core server processor from its era. This places it in the same power class as many mobile dual-core chips and well below typical desktop quad-cores of the time, which often consumed 65 to 95 watts. The low TDP is a direct result of the Harpertown architecture’s efficient 45 nm process and the L5410’s deliberately conservative clock speed of 2.33 GHz.
For cooling, a 50-watt TDP means that even a modest air cooler can handle the L5410 without difficulty. Standard low-profile server heatsinks or basic desktop tower coolers will be more than sufficient, and passive cooling solutions may also be viable in well-ventilated chassis. This makes the L5410 an attractive option for silence-focused builds or for repurposing into compact systems where heat dissipation is a concern.
The thermal implications extend to system design as well. Because the L5410 generates minimal heat, it does not require aggressive fan curves or high-static-pressure cooling setups. This can simplify chassis selection and reduce overall system noise. However, the processor’s age means that its 50-watt TDP is not comparable to modern low-power parts in terms of performance-per-watt, so the low heat output comes with a significant performance penalty.
Who Should Consider It
The L5410’s benchmark data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 1575 and a single-core score of 222. These numbers place it firmly in the realm of basic productivity and legacy software. For office tasks like document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, the L5410 can handle these workloads adequately, though it will feel sluggish with modern web applications that rely heavily on JavaScript and multi-threaded rendering.
For gaming, the L5410 is not a realistic option. The single-core score of 222 in Cinebench R23 is far below what modern games require, and the lack of boost clocks means it cannot dynamically increase performance under load. Even older games from the early 2010s will struggle to maintain playable frame rates, and the lack of modern instruction set extensions like AVX2 can cause crashes or severe performance degradation in newer titles.
Content creation is similarly out of reach. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 661 indicates that video editing, 3D rendering, and photo processing tasks will be extremely slow compared to even entry-level modern processors. The L5410 is best suited for hobbyists who want to experiment with legacy server platforms, homelab enthusiasts running lightweight Linux services, or anyone needing a low-power CPU for non-demanding server roles like file sharing or network routing.
Platform and Compatibility
The L5410 uses Intel Socket 771, which is a server-oriented socket that was primarily used in dual-socket motherboards. This means the processor is not compatible with mainstream desktop motherboards without adapter modifications, which are risky and unsupported. The platform supports DDR2 and DDR3 memory, but the specific type depends entirely on the motherboard, so there is no universal memory standard for this CPU.
Memory support is dual-channel, and the L5410 has ECC memory capability, which is a key feature for server workloads requiring data integrity. However, ECC memory is typically more expensive and less common than standard desktop RAM, and the motherboard must explicitly support it. The PCIe support is Gen 2, which limits modern graphics card compatibility to older models or those that can operate at reduced bandwidth without significant performance loss.
The upgrade path for Socket 771 is essentially nonexistent in 2025. The L5410 is end-of-life, and the socket was discontinued years ago. Users are limited to other Harpertown or related Xeon parts from the same era, none of which offer meaningful performance improvements. Anyone building on this platform should accept that they are at a dead end and plan for a full system replacement if future upgrades are needed.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Xeon L5410 support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the L5410 has ECC memory support, but the actual memory type (DDR2 or DDR3) depends on the motherboard used.
Q: What is the TDP of the L5410 and what cooling does it need?
A: The TDP is 50 watts, which means a basic air cooler is sufficient; no high-end or liquid cooling is required.
Q: How does the L5410 perform in modern gaming?
A: Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 222 is far too low for modern games, and the lack of boost clocks further hampers real-world gaming performance.
Q: Can the L5410 be overclocked?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported by the processor itself.
Q: What is the release date and original price of the L5410?
A: It was released on March 24, 2008, with a launch MSRP of $320.
Q: Is the L5410 still in production?
A: No, it is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer manufactured and is only available on the used market.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The L5410’s benchmark results reveal a significant imbalance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 222 in single-core and 1575 in multi-core, giving a multi-core to single-core ratio of roughly 7.1x. This is notably higher than the theoretical 4x scaling expected from a 4-core processor, which suggests that the multi-core score is disproportionately influenced by the test’s ability to utilize all cores efficiently, while the single-core score is heavily penalized by the low 2.33 GHz clock and older architecture.
In real-world terms, this means the L5410 is relatively better at fully parallel workloads than at single-threaded tasks. Applications like video encoding, batch file processing, and database queries that can use all four cores will see better utilization of the CPU’s capabilities. However, the absolute multi-core scores of 1575 (R23) and 661 (R20) are still very low by modern standards, so even parallel performance is only suitable for light or legacy tasks.
The single-thread behavior is the L5410’s biggest weakness. With a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 93, the processor will struggle with any application that relies on a single thread, such as spreadsheet formulas, web browsing with many tabs, or older games. The lack of a boost clock means there is no headroom for transient single-thread spikes, so the processor operates at its maximum 2.33 GHz at all times, which is insufficient for responsive modern desktop use. Users should prioritize multi-threaded workloads when considering this CPU, as its single-thread performance is a bottleneck for most interactive tasks.
The AMD Equivalent of Xeon L5410
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Xeon L5410 Comparisons
See how the Xeon L5410 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Xeon L5410 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs