Intel Xeon E5462
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Xeon E5462 Specifications
Xeon E5462 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Xeon E5462 features 4 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
E5462 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon E5462 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon E5462 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Xeon E5462 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the E5462 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon E5462's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Core 2 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Xeon E5462 is built on Intel's 45 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in E5462 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Core 2 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Xeon E5462 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Xeon E5462 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 80W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 771 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Xeon E5462 uses the Intel Socket 771 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 771 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the E5462 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon E5462 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon E5462 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
About Intel Xeon E5462
The Intel Xeon E5462 is a 45 nm Harpertown Xeon launched on 2007-11-10 for the server and workstation segment. It has four cores, four threads, and a base clock of 2.80 GHz, with no boost clock listed in the data. The chip fits Intel Socket 771 and carries an 80 W TDP. Its average benchmark score is 652, which places it at the 15th percentile of all CPUs in the database and directly alongside a small cluster of mainstream Intel Core and AMD Athlon processors.
Benchmark Performance
The fact pack includes five Cinebench results for the E5462. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 191. In Cinebench R20, it scores 796 in multi-core and 112 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1896 in multi-core and 267 in single-core. These figures show a processor whose aggregate standing is modest but tightly bracketed by its nearest rivals.
The average benchmark score of 652 is the best single summary of where this chip sits. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-3210, has an average score of 650, and the E5462 is 0.3% ahead. That is effectively a tie. The Intel Core i7-3555LE has an average score of 654, with the E5462 0.3% behind. The Intel Core i5-3427U and the AMD Athlon II X4 635 both have average scores of 655 and 656, respectively, and the E5462 trails each by 0.5%. Across the entire nearest-rival group, the spread from the slowest rival to the fastest is only six points, and the E5462 sits almost exactly in the middle of that range.
The percentile data reinforces the same conclusion. A 15th percentile standing among all CPUs means the E5462 is outclassed by the majority of processors in the database, but the nearest rivals are extremely close in average score. The benchmark results indicate that the E5462 should be evaluated as a low-end processor by modern aggregate metrics, not as a chip with a meaningful performance advantage over the small cluster of CPUs it is grouped with.
Power and Thermals
The E5462 is rated at an 80 W TDP. That is a modest thermal envelope for a four-core server/workstation part from the Core 2 era. The chip is built on Intel's 45 nm process and contains 820 million transistors. The package uses two dies, each with a die size of 107 mm², so the physical die area is substantial even though the core count is only four. The L2 cache is 6 MB per die, which fits the dual-die design.
An 80 W TDP implies that a capable air cooler is sufficient for this processor. The thermal requirement is not extreme enough to demand exotic liquid cooling, and the server/workstation market placement would typically assume a motherboard and chassis designed for socket 771 server cooling. The lack of integrated graphics removes one source of heat from the package. The combination of a 45 nm process, a four-core layout, and an 80 W TDP makes the E5462 a moderate-power part for its generation, though the 2007 release date means the manufacturing process and architectural efficiency are older than what modern platforms use.
Platform and Compatibility
The E5462 uses Intel Socket 771. Memory support is dual-channel, and the fact pack lists both DDR2 and DDR3 as options depending on the motherboard. That means memory compatibility is not fixed by the CPU alone; the board determines which memory generation can be used. ECC memory is supported, which is consistent with the server and workstation market segment. The processor provides PCIe Gen 2 connectivity. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete display adapter is required for any visual output.
The multiplier is locked, so the E5462 is not designed for user-controlled overclocking. The production status is end-of-life, and the release date is 2007-11-10. The launch MSRP is $797. For upgrade purposes, the Socket 771 platform defines the boundary of what this processor can work with. Since the chip is end-of-life, the practical upgrade path is constrained to the motherboard and socket it already occupies; there is no supported route to a newer socket within this product's platform definition. The motherboard dependency for DDR2 versus DDR3 is an important compatibility caveat, because the same processor can land in systems with different memory technologies.
How It Compares
Against the Intel Core i3-3210, the E5462 is 0.3% ahead in average benchmark score. The Core i3-3210's average score is 650, while the E5462's average score is 652. That is a near-perfect parity in aggregate performance, and the benchmark data does not establish a meaningful winner between the two.
Against the Intel Core i7-3555LE, the E5462 is 0.3% behind. The Core i7-3555LE has an average score of 654. Despite the Xeon branding and server/workstation positioning, the E5462 cannot move ahead of this low-voltage Core i7 part in the database average. The difference is still tiny, but it runs against the E5462.
Against the Intel Core i5-3427U, the E5462 is 0.5% behind. The Core i5-3427U posts an average score of 655. This is a mobile-oriented processor with a lower thermal class, yet the aggregate score still edges out the Xeon. The E5462's server classification does not translate into a performance lead in this comparison.
Against the AMD Athlon II X4 635, the E5462 is also 0.5% behind. The AMD part has an average score of 656, the highest among the nearest rivals. This is the largest deficit in the group, though it is still less than one percentage point. The E5462 and the Athlon II X4 635 are effectively in the same performance tier by average score.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The E5462's single-thread and multi-thread results show a clear split. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score is 112 and the multi-core score is 796. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 267 and the multi-core score is 1896. The multi-core figures are several times larger than the single-core figures, which is expected for a chip with four cores and four threads. The thread count matches the core count, so there is no extra parallel headroom from simultaneous multithreading.
This split suggests the E5462 will serve heavily threaded workloads much better than latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks. Rendering, batch processing, and other server-style workloads that can use all four cores are more likely to show the chip's strengths. Single-thread performance is limited by the 2.80 GHz base clock and the absence of a boost clock in the data. Since the chip cannot raise its clock for a single active core, there is no dynamic uplift to help lightly threaded scenarios.
The cache layout is also per-die rather than shared across the full processor. Each die has 6 MB of L2, and each core has 64 KB of L1 cache. The dual-die package means the multi-threaded workload must share data across two physical dies, which is a structural characteristic of the Harpertown design. For a server/workstation part released in 2007, this behavior is consistent with an era when multi-thread throughput mattered more than single-thread responsiveness in the target market. The benchmark data makes that trade-off explicit: the E5462 is a much stronger multi-core part than single-core part, and its nearest rivals in average score do not change that fundamental behavior.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the Intel Xeon E5462 are below.
Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Xeon E5462 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Xeon E5462 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Xeon E5462. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Xeon E5462. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Xeon E5462 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Xeon E5462 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.
Compare with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs