Intel Core m7-6Y75

The Intel Core m7-6Y75 is a 2-core, 4-thread mobile processor built on Intel’s 14 nm process, with the architecture listed as Skylake and the codename Skylake-Y. It has a base clock of 1200.00, a boost clock of 3.10, 4 MB of shared L3 cache, and a 5 W TDP. The CPU is designed for the Intel BGA 1515 socket and includes Intel HD 515 integrated graphics. In the benchmark database it sits at the 17th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 690, placing it alongside a tight cluster of older and lower-power desktop and embedded rivals.

Benchmark Performance

The Cinebench results are the core of the performance picture. In Cinebench R15, the m7-6Y75 scores 202 in the multicore test. In Cinebench R20, it scores 842 multicore and 118 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score rises to 2007 and the single-core score is 283. These numbers are all modest in absolute terms, but they consistently show a common pattern: the multicore result is substantially larger than the single-core result, reflecting the 2-core, 4-thread configuration.

The average benchmark score of 690 is useful for placing the processor in the broader field. That average puts the m7-6Y75 at the 17th percentile of all CPUs, meaning the majority of chips in the database are above it. The nearest rivals confirm just how tightly packed this part is with other low-end processors. The AMD Phenom II X4 840T has an average score of 690 and a deltaPct of 0. The Intel Celeron G3920 has an average score of 689 and a deltaPct of 0.1. The Intel Atom x7211RE has an average score of 691 and a deltaPct of -0.1. The Intel Celeron G4900 also has an average score of 691 and a deltaPct of -0.1. The m7-6Y75 therefore sits within 0.1% of all four of these processors on the average benchmark scale.

The parity with the AMD Phenom II X4 840T is noteworthy because that rival carries the same 690 average score. The m7-6Y75 is also essentially level with two Intel Celeron parts and one Intel Atom part. That means the Skylake-Y processor does not separate itself from this group on raw Cinebench-derived performance. Its advantage is more likely found in its low 5 W TDP and mobile platform integration rather than in a higher benchmark position.

Who Should Consider It

Given the 17th percentile overall ranking and average benchmark score of 690, the m7-6Y75 is not aimed at workloads that demand sustained high multicore throughput. The market segment listed is Mobile, so the intended environment is a mobile system where power consumption matters more than raw performance.

For general office-style productivity, the 2-core, 4-thread design can be sufficient for lightly threaded tasks. The 4 MB shared L3 cache and 29.9 GB/s memory bandwidth are enough for documents, web browsing, and similar workloads. The single-core Cinebench R20 score of 118 and R23 score of 283 are modest, but they still provide the basis for everyday responsive applications that do not scale heavily across many threads.

For content-creation workloads, the multi-core Cinebench scores of 202 in R15, 842 in R20, and 2007 in R23 indicate that heavy rendering is not a good match. A processor sitting at the 17th percentile of all CPUs will struggle with scene-based rendering jobs that can use every available thread. The same is true for memory-heavy creation tasks, since the cache and memory resources are limited.

For gaming, the only graphics solution in the data is Intel HD 515. There is no discrete GPU listed in the fact pack, so the platform’s gaming capability is tied to that integrated graphics controller and to the CPU’s low overall position. The 10 PCIe lanes from the CPU are also a limiting factor for any add-in expansion. Users who need a high-refresh gaming system should look well above this part in the CPU hierarchy.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Cinebench results show a clear separation between single-thread and multi-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score is 118 and the multicore score is 842. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 283 and the multicore score is 2007. In both tests, the multicore result is far above the single-core result, which is logical for a CPU with 2 cores and 4 threads. The extra two threads allow workloads to spread beyond the two physical cores.

That said, the absolute level of both single-core and multicore performance is low relative to the database. A single-core R23 score of 283 is not strong, and the multicore score of 2007 is also low. The base clock of 1200.00 and the boost clock of 3.10 define the available frequency range. Single-threaded workflows will rely on the chance to boost toward the 3.10 figure, while multithreaded workflows must operate within the same 5 W thermal envelope. The data does not include a separate all-core boost figure, so the only confirmed datapoints are the 1200.00 base and 3.10 boost.

The cache structure also suggests a design focused on lightweight workloads. The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. These are modest amounts, and they reinforce the idea that the processor is built for low-power mobile operation rather than for sustained compute-heavy sessions.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core m7-6Y75 use?

A: It uses the Intel BGA 1515 socket.

Q: What memory does it support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR3 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 283, and the multicore score is 2007.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked?

A: No, the multiplier unlocked field is false.

Q: When was the processor released, and what is its production status?

A: The release date is 2015-08-31, and the production status is end-of-life.

Q: What integrated graphics does the processor include?

A: It includes Intel HD 515 integrated graphics.

Power and Thermals

The TDP of the Intel Core m7-6Y75 is 5 W. That is the single most important number for understanding its power behavior. A 5 W TDP places this chip in the ultra-low-power class, especially for a 2-core, 4-thread processor with a 14 nm process node. The Skylake-Y codename further identifies it as part of Intel’s low-power Y-series mobile lineup.

Because the TDP is only 5 W, the cooling requirement is minimal. The processor does not need a large heat sink or an aggressive thermal solution. The thermal design can be tuned for a compact mobile system, and the low power envelope is consistent with the mobile market segment. The 14 nm process helps keep the power consumption low enough for this class of part.

At the same time, the low TDP has consequences for performance. The boost clock of 3.10 is only useful when the thermal and power budget allows it. The multi-core Cinebench scores of 842 in R20 and 2007 in R23 are produced within that 5 W limit, which explains why the CPU does not climb higher in the ranking. The base clock of 1200.00 provides the lower frequency anchor, while the 3.10 boost clock shows the short-term headroom available to lightly threaded tasks.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core m7-6Y75 is built for the Intel BGA 1515 socket. That socket is mobile-oriented, and the market segment is listed as Mobile. Memory support is DDR3 in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe support is Gen 3 with 10 lanes from the CPU only.

The processor includes Intel HD 515 integrated graphics, so no separate GPU is necessary for basic display output. The CPU is part of the Skylake architecture, with the codename Skylake-Y and the generation listed as Core m7 (Skylake-Y). The process node is 14 nm, and the foundry is Intel.

The production status is end-of-life, and the release date is 2015-08-31. The part number is SR2EH. Because the socket is BGA 1515 and the package is mobile-oriented, the upgrade path is tied to the system board rather than to a socketed desktop platform. The end-of-life status also means the platform is not a candidate for new high-volume designs going forward. The combination of BGA 1515, DDR3 memory, and Intel HD 515 defines a complete, low-power mobile platform that made sense in its 2015-era context but remains limited by its 17th percentile standing and 5 W power envelope.