INTEL

Intel Core i7-610E

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

2
Cores
4
Threads
3.2
GHz Boost
35W
TDP
Integrated GPU ECC Memory

At a Glance

Intel
Cores / Threads 2C / 4T
Boost Clock 3.2 GHz
Base Clock 2.53 GHz
L3 Cache 4 MB (shared)
TDP 35W
Architecture Westmere
Socket Intel BGA 1288
nm
Process 32 nm
Released Jan 2010

Intel Core i7-610E Specifications

Core i7-610E Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Core i7-610E features 2 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
2
Threads
4
SMP CPUs
1

i7-610E Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Core i7-610E benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core i7-610E by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.53 GHz
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
Multiplier
19x

Intel's Core i7-610E Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the i7-610E processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core i7-610E's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB (shared)

Westmere Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Core i7-610E is built on Intel's 32 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in i7-610E incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Westmere
Codename
Arrandale
Process Node
32 nm
Foundry
Intel
Transistors
382 million
Die Size
81 mm²
Generation
Core i7 (Arrandale)

Westmere Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Core i7-610E by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES-NI
Intel 64
VT-x

i7-610E Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Core i7-610E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 35W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
35W
Tj Max
105°C

Intel BGA 1288 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Core i7-610E uses the Intel BGA 1288 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel BGA 1288
Chipsets
HM55, QM57
PCIe
Gen 2, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
mFCBGA10
DDR5

Intel BGA 1288 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the i7-610E define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core i7-610E determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR3
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
17.1 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Intel's Core i7-610E Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The Intel Core i7-610E includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the i7-610E provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Graphics Model
HD Graphics (Ironlake)

Core i7-610E Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core i7-610E by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Jan 2010
Launch Price
$332
Market
Mobile
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
SLBRZSLBXXQ4NG

Core i7-610E Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core i7-610E performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #1683 of 1945
177
1%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core i7-610E. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #1683 of 1945
739
1%
Max: 62,412

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core i7-610E. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #1679 of 1935
104
1%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core i7-610E after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #1683 of 1945
1,760
1%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core i7-610E maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #1669 of 1932
248
1%
Max: 20,979

About Intel Core i7-610E

The Intel Core i7-610E is a dual-core mobile processor from the Arrandale generation, built on Intel's 32 nm process with 382 million transistors on an 81 mm² die. It targets the mobile segment with a 35 W TDP, and benchmark results place it at the 14th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is suited for light, everyday workloads rather than demanding tasks. Its average benchmark score of 606 ties it with several rivals, making it a baseline performer in its class.

Who Should Consider It

The Core i7-610E is best suited for users running legacy office applications, basic web browsing, and light productivity tasks where single-threaded responsiveness matters more than parallel throughput. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 248 is modest, but it delivers acceptable performance for older software that relies on a single thread. Multi-threaded workloads, however, are clearly not its strength — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 1760 shows that the dual-core, four-thread configuration struggles under parallel load.

For content creation, this processor is largely inadequate. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 739 and R15 multi-core score of 177 indicate that video rendering, 3D modeling, or batch photo processing would take significantly longer compared to modern processors. Gaming is similarly limited; the integrated HD Graphics (Ironlake) is from an older era, and the CPU’s low multi-thread scores will bottleneck even moderately demanding titles. The data suggests this chip is only viable for basic computing — email, document editing, and lightweight spreadsheets — where its 2.53 GHz base clock and 3.20 GHz boost clock provide enough responsiveness for casual use.

Users who prioritize energy efficiency in a compact mobile system might consider it, as the 35 W TDP aligns with thin-and-light designs of its time. Yet, with an end-of-life production status and a 14th percentile global ranking, there are few modern scenarios where this processor is a rational choice unless software compatibility with older platforms is a hard requirement.

Power and Thermals

The Intel Core i7-610E carries a 35 W TDP, which places it in the low-power mobile class. This TDP level implies that a modest cooling solution — such as a small heatpipe assembly or a low-profile fan — is sufficient to maintain stable operation under sustained load. The 32 nm process node helps keep heat generation manageable, but the dual-core design with Hyper-Threading (four threads) still produces enough heat under stress that passive cooling alone would be marginal.

Benchmark-derived thermal behavior indicates that the chip does not require high-end cooling. A capable air cooler designed for low-TDP mobile sockets would adequately handle the thermal output. The absence of an unlocked multiplier means users cannot adjust voltage or clock speeds to trade power for performance, so the 35 W envelope is fixed. In practice, this makes the i7-610E well-suited for systems where fan noise and battery life are more critical than raw performance, but it also caps the ceiling for any overclocking or undervolting experimentation.

Platform and Compatibility

The i7-610E uses the Intel BGA 1288 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable package. This means the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard, eliminating any possibility of a drop-in CPU upgrade. The platform is based on the Westmere architecture with the Arrandale codename, supporting dual-channel DDR3 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s and ECC memory capability, which is unusual for a mobile chip and beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

PCIe support is limited to Gen 2 with 16 lanes from the CPU only, which restricts expansion to a single graphics card or a couple of NVMe adapters (though NVMe was not common during its era). The integrated HD Graphics (Ironlake) provides basic display output, but it lacks the performance for modern graphical interfaces or video playback beyond low resolutions. Upgrade path is nonexistent due to the BGA socket; users are locked into the original motherboard and its memory type (DDR3), which is now outdated. Compatibility with modern operating systems and drivers may also be limited given the 2010 release date, though the architecture itself is well-documented.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i7-610E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates ECC memory support is enabled, which is rare for a mobile processor and could appeal to users requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the cache configuration?

A: The processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 4 MB for the entire chip.

Q: Can I overclock this processor?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the FACT PACK lists "multiplierUnlocked" as false, so clock speed adjustments are not possible.

Q: How does it perform in single-threaded tasks compared to multi-threaded?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 248, while the multi-core score is 1760. The single-core performance is proportionally stronger relative to its multi-core performance, but both are low in absolute terms.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth?

A: The dual-channel DDR3 memory bus provides a theoretical bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s, which is modest by modern standards.

Q: Is the processor still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of January 6, 2010, so it is no longer manufactured.

How It Compares

AMD Phenom II X4 830: The i7-610E and the Phenom II X4 830 both achieve an average benchmark score of 606, with a delta of 0%. Despite the AMD chip having four physical cores versus the Intel’s two cores with four threads, their overall benchmark performance is identical. This suggests that the i7-610E’s higher clock speeds and architectural efficiency compensate for the core count disadvantage in the tested workloads.

Intel Core i5-2430M: This rival also scores 606 on average, matching the i7-610E exactly (0% delta). The i5-2430M is a newer Sandy Bridge mobile chip, but the benchmark data shows no practical performance difference between them in aggregate. Single-thread and multi-thread scores would likely vary, but the overall average indicates parity.

Intel Atom x7-E3950: With an average score of 606 and a delta of 0.1%, the Atom x7-E3950 is essentially tied with the i7-610E. This is notable because the Atom is a low-power, fanless-oriented chip, yet its performance in these benchmarks matches the i7-610E. The i7-610E’s higher boost clock (3.20 GHz) may help in bursty tasks, but sustained workloads show no clear winner.

Intel Celeron 4305UE: The Celeron scores 605 on average, a 0.1% delta below the i7-610E. This negligible difference means the two are indistinguishable in practical terms. The Celeron is a modern low-end part, so the fact that a 2010 mobile i7 only edges it out by 0.1% underscores how far the i7-610E has fallen in relative performance.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Cinebench R23 scores reveal a clear split: a single-core score of 248 versus a multi-core score of 1760. The ratio of multi-core to single-core is roughly 7.1x, which is higher than the theoretical 2x from having two physical cores, due to Hyper-Threading and the benchmark’s scaling. This indicates that the i7-610E scales well across its four threads, but the absolute numbers are low. For real-world applications, this means single-threaded tasks like opening applications or scrolling web pages will feel snappy enough for basic use, but any task that utilizes multiple threads — such as video encoding or compiling — will expose the processor’s limitations.

In Cinebench R20, the single-core score drops to 104, while multi-core is 739, showing a similar scaling pattern. The gap between single and multi scores suggests that software optimized for multi-threading will see a benefit, but the starting point is so low that even a 7x improvement does not reach usable levels for demanding workloads. The data indicates that the i7-610E is a dual-core chip with decent thread scaling, but its architectural age limits both single-thread efficiency and multi-thread throughput.

Benchmark Performance

Across all Cinebench versions, the i7-610E posts consistently low scores. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 177; in R20 multi-core, it improves to 739; and in R23 multi-core, it reaches 1760. These numbers reflect the processor’s dual-core design with four threads, and the increase across versions is due to the benchmarks themselves being more demanding, not the CPU performing better. The single-core scores follow a similar pattern: 104 in R20 and 248 in R23, with no R15 single-core data provided.

Against its nearest rivals, the i7-610E is statistically tied with all of them. The AMD Phenom II X4 830 and Intel Core i5-2430M both have an average score of 606 with a 0% delta, meaning the i7-610E offers no performance advantage. The Intel Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 4305UE trail by a mere 0.1%, with scores of 606 and 605 respectively. This near-perfect parity across different architectures and generations suggests that the benchmark average is a reliable indicator of overall capability, but it also highlights that the i7-610E is not a standout performer in any category. The 14th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it sits in the bottom tier of processors, suitable only for the lightest workloads.

The AMD Equivalent of Core i7-610E

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD • 8 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Core i7-610E Comparisons

See how the Core i7-610E stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Core i7-610E with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs