Intel Core 2 Duo E8435
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Core 2 Duo E8435 Specifications
Core 2 Duo E8435 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
2 Duo E8435 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Core 2 Duo E8435 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core 2 Duo E8435 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Core 2 Duo E8435 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the 2 Duo E8435 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core 2 Duo E8435's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Core 2 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 is built on Intel's 45 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in 2 Duo E8435 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Core 2 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Core 2 Duo E8435 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
2 Duo E8435 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 44W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket P Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the Intel Socket P socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket P Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the 2 Duo E8435 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core 2 Duo E8435 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Core 2 Duo E8435 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the 2 Duo E8435 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Core 2 Duo E8435 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core 2 Duo E8435 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Core 2 Duo E8435 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core 2 Duo E8435. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core 2 Duo E8435. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.
About Intel Core 2 Duo E8435
The Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 is a mobile processor from Intel’s Core 2 generation, built around the Penryn codename on Intel’s 45 nm process. The chip contains 410 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, with a TDP of 44. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, a base clock of 3.07 GHz, and no boost clock recorded. The cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core and 6 MB of shared L2. Memory support is DDR2 and DDR3 over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory not supported. The processor uses Intel Socket P, is listed for the mobile market segment, and has a production status of end-of-life. Its release date is March 2, 2009. In the fact pack, the benchmark list is empty, the average benchmark score is 0, the percentile against all CPUs is 50, and no nearest rivals are provided.
Benchmark Performance
The numerical performance record for the E8435 is minimal. The benchmarks array contains no entries, so there are no individual workload scores to examine. The aggregate field lists an average benchmark score of 0, and the percentileVsAllCpus field places the processor at the 50th percentile. Because the nearestRivals array is empty, there are no named competitors, no rival scores, and no delta values to calculate. As a result, the type of exact comparative statement that benchmark databases usually produce cannot be made for this product.
The 50th percentile is the one meaningful rank signal in the dataset. It places the E8435 at the midpoint of the aggregate all-CPU distribution captured by the fact pack. That is an ordinal position, not a magnitude. A chip at the 50th percentile can sit close to entries above and below it, or far from them, and without nearest-rival data the distance cannot be measured. The empty nearest-rivals list also means no lead or deficit can be quoted. No statement such as “ahead of a named rival by a specific amount” is supported by the available fields.
The 0 average benchmark score should be read as a missing value rather than as a functional score. Since the benchmarks array is empty, there is no measured workload data from which an average could be derived. The 0 is the placeholder stored in the aggregate field, and the 50th percentile is the only comparative position available.
The absence of a boost clock also matters for benchmark interpretation. The 3.07 GHz base clock is the only frequency figure in the fact pack, so the recorded clock ceiling is the same as the base clock. No higher single-core or multi-core frequency is listed. Without nearest-rival clock values, the data cannot be used to state how the frequency compares to any other product.
Who Should Consider It
The E8435 is defined by its execution resource limits: 2 cores and 2 threads. Software that uses more than two concurrent threads will exceed the thread count listed in the fact pack. For workloads that use no more than two threads, the relevant strengths are the 3.07 GHz base clock and the 6 MB shared L2 cache. The L2 pool is significantly larger than the 64 KB L1 allocation per core, and the shared design means both cores draw from the same 6 MB space.
Office-style work is a plausible fit if the workload consists of lightly threaded interactive tasks. The fact pack does not contain application scores, so this is an inference from the core topology and clock, not a measured result. A 2-thread processor with a 3.07 GHz base clock can service tasks that do not scale beyond two threads. The 44 TDP figure places the part in a mobile thermal class, although the fact pack does not provide cooling or system-level power data.
Creation workloads present a split picture. Single-threaded editing operations may benefit from the high base clock and the shared L2 cache. Multi-thread creation tasks such as encoding or rendering are constrained by the 2-thread limit. Because no boost clock is listed, there is no recorded temporary frequency reserve for short bursts. The processor cannot be described as having extra single-core frequency beyond 3.07 GHz.
The mobile market segment identifies the intended system type, and the end-of-life production status means the fact pack does not describe a current availability path. The data includes no gaming benchmark scores, so no gaming recommendation can be grounded in measured results. A user with strictly two-thread software and a focus on base-clock performance may find the E8435 workable; a user whose software needs more than two threads will run into the hard thread cap.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The core count and thread count are both 2, meaning the processor provides exactly two threads for two cores. There is no additional thread-per-core feature recorded in the fact pack. Multi-thread capability is therefore bounded by the two physical cores.
For single-thread behavior, the 3.07 GHz base clock is the only frequency number available. With no boost clock in the data, the processor cannot be credited with a higher single-core frequency. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core, so each core has its own dedicated L1 block. The L2 cache is 6 MB shared, so a single active thread can draw on the shared pool. The cache policy is not documented in the fact pack, so the data does not specify how the shared 6 MB is partitioned.
For multi-thread behavior, both cores access the same 6 MB L2 and the same dual-channel DDR2/DDR3 memory interface. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC support is false, meaning the platform path is non-ECC. No L3 cache is listed, so the cache hierarchy in the record ends at the 6 MB shared L2.
The architecture is Core 2, with the Penryn codename and a 45 nm process node. Those physical descriptors do not quantify instructions per clock or per-thread efficiency. The fact pack provides no measured single-thread or multi-thread workload scores. The behavioral split can only be characterized from the structural data: a 3.07 GHz base clock, a 64 KB per-core L1, a 6 MB shared L2, and a 2-thread execution limit.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals field is empty in the fact pack. There is no rival list, no rival name, no rival score, and no delta figure. Without those entries, the E8435 cannot be compared head-to-head with any specific product. No competitor paragraph can be constructed from the fact pack because no competitor data is present.
The only cross-CPU comparison point is the percentileVsAllCpus value of 50. This places the E8435 at the median of the database’s all-CPU distribution. The 50th percentile is a positional statement, not a distance measurement. It does not say how far the processor is from entries above or below it, because no neighboring entries are listed.
The empty nearest-rivals array is itself the key finding. Any claim that the E8435 is a certain amount faster or slower than another product would require data not contained in the fact pack. The available dataset provides a percentile rank but no adjacent products against which to measure margin.
Platform and Compatibility
The E8435 is built for Intel Socket P. That socket is the only platform interface listed in the fact pack. Memory support covers DDR2 and DDR3, and the memory bus is dual-channel. ECC memory is not supported. No memory bandwidth figure is provided, so the throughput of the dual-channel memory path is not quantified in the data.
Integrated graphics are not described as part of the processor itself. The fact pack states that integrated graphics appear on certain motherboards as a chipset feature. This means the processor’s display output depends on the motherboard chipset in the data, not on an on-die graphics block.
The PCIe field is null, so no PCIe version, lane count, or bandwidth information is available. No L3 cache is listed, and no memory bandwidth number is recorded. The market segment is Mobile, the production status is End-of-life, and the release date is March 2, 2009. The multiplier is not unlocked, so no multiplier-based frequency adjustment is represented in the data. The part number QBDWQBEEQHBQQHHLSLAQDSLGEA is recorded, and Intel is listed as the foundry.
The physical platform profile includes the 45 nm process, 410 million transistors, and a 107 mm² die size. For upgrade path, the fact pack does not list compatible processors. The known constraints are the Intel Socket P socket class and the DDR2/DDR3 dual-channel memory support. Because the production status is end-of-life, the data does not indicate a newer drop-in choice on the same socket. The null PCIe field also limits any statement about expansion capability.
The AMD Equivalent of Core 2 Duo E8435
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 Comparisons
See how the Core 2 Duo E8435 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Core 2 Duo E8435 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs