Intel Celeron G1830
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Celeron G1830 Specifications
Celeron G1830 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Celeron G1830 features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Celeron G1830 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Celeron G1830 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Celeron G1830 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Celeron G1830 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Celeron G1830 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Celeron G1830's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Haswell Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Celeron G1830 is built on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Celeron G1830 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Haswell Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Celeron G1830 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Celeron G1830 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Celeron G1830 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 54W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 1150 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Celeron G1830 uses the Intel Socket 1150 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 1150 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Celeron G1830 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Celeron G1830 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Celeron G1830 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Celeron G1830 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Celeron G1830 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Celeron G1830 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Celeron G1830 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Celeron G1830 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Celeron G1830 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. Higher scores mean faster render times in professional applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Celeron G1830.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Celeron G1830.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Celeron G1830 after thermal limits kick in.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Celeron G1830 maintains boost clocks under continuous load.
About Intel Celeron G1830
Intel's Celeron G1830 is a desktop processor with 2 cores and 2 threads, built on the Haswell architecture using Intel's 22 nm process. It runs at a fixed 2.80 GHz base clock with no boost clock, uses Intel Socket 1150, and carries a 54 W TDP. Its aggregate benchmark score of 456 places it in the 7th percentile of all CPUs in the database, an important context for everything that follows.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The benchmark data draws a clear line between single-core and multi-core throughput. In Cinebench R23, the G1830 scores 187 in the single-core test and 1326 in the multi-core test. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score is 78 and the multi-core score is 556. The R15 multi-core result is 133. These numbers show that using both available threads produces a substantially higher score than relying on one core, but they also show that the absolute ceiling is low.
Because the processor has only 2 threads, multi-core scaling has a hard limit. The higher multi-core result does not imply broad parallel strength; it simply reflects that two cores can complete work faster than one. Real workloads that cannot split across threads will hit the single-core ceiling defined by the 187 R23 score and the 78 R20 score. By contrast, workloads that divide cleanly across both threads will get closer to the 1326 R23 multi-core result. The absence of a boost clock means there is no temporary single-thread speedup available, so the 2.80 GHz clock is the maximum frequency in every scenario.
The aggregate position reinforces this picture. With a 7th-percentile standing and an average benchmark score of 456, the G1830 is positioned well below the mainstream field. The gap between single-core and multi-core scores is consistent with a 2-thread Haswell design, but the absolute values are what matter most for workload planning.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark results point toward a narrow set of use cases. For heavy creation workloads, the multi-core scores of 133 in R15, 556 in R20, and 1326 in R23 offer limited headroom for rendering or sustained processing. The low single-core scores further suggest that even lightly threaded productivity tasks will not feel fast by current database standards. The G1830 is not a chip designed for demanding games or serious content creation.
The more plausible scenario is a basic desktop build where the integrated Intel HD (Haswell) graphics removes the need for a separate graphics card. Light everyday tasks, such as document editing or web browsing, may be acceptable if the workload does not push the single core beyond its limits. For gaming, the low aggregate percentile and low single-core score indicate that CPU-bound scenes will be constrained, though no gaming-specific benchmark is included in the data. For office-style use, the lack of ECC memory support and the DDR3-only memory interface also define a conventional desktop rather than a workstation platform.
The multiplier is locked, and there is no boost clock, so there is no overclocking or turbo headroom to recover additional performance. Users with an existing Socket 1150 board might consider this chip as a basic drop-in processor, but anyone expecting multi-threaded creation capability or strong single-thread response should look elsewhere.
Benchmark Performance
The G1830 achieves an average benchmark score of 456. That score sits at the edge of a very tight cluster of nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-4200Y has an average score of 455, with a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Athlon II X3 420e also averages 455, with a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Xeon E5335 and the Intel Celeron J4005 both average 452, each with a delta of 0.8%. This means the G1830 leads every listed rival, but the margins are extremely small: all deltas are under 1%.
The practical takeaway is that the aggregate data treats the G1830 and its four nearest rivals as near-equivalents. A 0.1% gap over the i5-4200Y is effectively a tie. A 0.8% gap over the Xeon E5335 and the Celeron J4005 is still close enough that per-test workloads will matter more than the aggregate score. The Cinebench results reinforce the same conclusion: 1326 in R23 multi-core and 556 in R20 multi-core are low in absolute terms, and the single-core scores of 187 and 78 put the G1830 in a performance class where no single benchmark result should be overinterpreted.
Platform and Compatibility
The G1830 is a Socket 1150 processor built on the Haswell architecture. Its 22 nm process die contains 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² footprint. The cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 3 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR3 through a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is not supported.
PCIe connectivity is Gen 3. The integrated graphics block is Intel HD (Haswell), which means a basic system does not require a discrete GPU. The processor is not multiplier unlocked, and there is no boost clock. Its release date is 2013-11-30, and the production status is listed as Active. For upgrade considerations, the platform is tied to Intel Socket 1150, so any CPU replacement must remain within that socket family. The DDR3-only memory support and lack of ECC further limit the platform to general desktop use rather than memory-critical server or workstation configurations.
How It Compares
Intel Core i5-4200Y: This is the closest rival. The G1830 averages 456, the i5-4200Y averages 455, and the delta is 0.1%. The aggregate benchmark profile does not separate them in any meaningful way.
AMD Athlon II X3 420e: This rival also averages 455, with a delta of 0.2%. The G1830 is marginally ahead, but the gap is small enough that the two processors should be considered statistically comparable in aggregate terms.
Intel Xeon E5335: The Xeon E5335 averages 452, and the G1830 leads by 0.8%. The delta is slightly larger than the two closest rivals, but it still places both processors in the same aggregate performance neighborhood.
Intel Celeron J4005: The J4005 averages 452, with the same 0.8% delta. The G1830 holds a narrow aggregate lead, but the data suggests these two processors occupy the same general capability tier.
FAQ
Q: What Cinebench R23 scores does the Intel Celeron G1830 produce?
A: It scores 187 in single-core and 1326 in multi-core.
Q: Which socket does the G1830 use?
A: It uses Intel Socket 1150.
Q: Does the G1830 support ECC memory?
A: No, ECC memory is not supported. Memory support is DDR3 with a dual-channel bus.
Q: How close is the G1830 to its nearest rival?
A: Its average score is 456, while the nearest rival, Intel Core i5-4200Y, scores 455, a delta of 0.1%.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, and there is no boost clock.
Q: What is the release date?
A: The release date is 2013-11-30.
Power and Thermals
The G1830 carries a 54 W TDP, placing it in a moderate power class for a desktop processor. The fixed 2.80 GHz clock and the absence of a boost clock mean the CPU does not have a higher transient clock state to manage, which keeps thermal behavior relatively predictable. A basic desktop air cooler should be sufficient for this power level.
The 22 nm process and 2-core, 2-thread design keep the thermal envelope modest. The integrated Intel HD (Haswell) graphics adds to the platform's total heat, but the CPU-side thermal requirement is defined by the 54 W TDP. For a Socket 1150 system, this is not a demanding part in terms of cooling, even though its benchmark standing is low. The Active production status means it can still appear in builds, but the power and thermal profile does not change the earlier performance conclusion: this is a modest processor with low aggregate benchmark results.
The AMD Equivalent of Celeron G1830
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Celeron G1830 Comparisons
See how the Celeron G1830 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Celeron G1830 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs