INTEL

Intel Celeron 3755U

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

2
Cores
2
Threads
GHz Boost
15W
TDP
Integrated GPU

At a Glance

Intel
Cores / Threads 2C / 2T
Base Clock 1700 GHz
L3 Cache 2 MB (shared)
TDP 15W
Architecture Broadwell
Socket Intel BGA 1168
nm
Process 14 nm
Released Mar 2015

Intel Celeron 3755U Specifications

Celeron 3755U Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Celeron 3755U features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
2
Threads
2
SMP CPUs
1

Celeron 3755U Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Celeron 3755U benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Celeron 3755U by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
1700 GHz
Boost Clock
N/A
Multiplier
17x

Intel's Celeron 3755U Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Celeron 3755U processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Celeron 3755U's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
2 MB (shared)

Broadwell Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Celeron 3755U is built on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Celeron 3755U incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Broadwell
Codename
Broadwell-U
Process Node
14 nm
Foundry
Intel
Transistors
1,300 million
Die Size
82 mm²
Generation
Celeron (Broadwell-U)

Broadwell Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Celeron 3755U by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
FMA3
AES-NI
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Intel 64
VT-x
VT-d

Celeron 3755U Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Celeron 3755U has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 15W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
15W
Configurable TDP
10W

Intel BGA 1168 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Celeron 3755U uses the Intel BGA 1168 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel BGA 1168
PCIe
Gen 2, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-BGA14F
DDR5

Intel BGA 1168 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Celeron 3755U define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Celeron 3755U determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR3
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s

Intel's Celeron 3755U Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The Intel Celeron 3755U includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Celeron 3755U provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
Intel HD
Graphics Model
Intel HD

Celeron 3755U Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Celeron 3755U is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Celeron 3755U by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Mar 2015
Launch Price
$107
Market
Mobile
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
SR211

Celeron 3755U Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Celeron 3755U performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #1903 of 1967
101
1%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Celeron 3755U. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #1723 of 1786
421
1%
Max: 62,412

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Celeron 3755U. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #1720 of 1776
59
1%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Celeron 3755U after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #1875 of 1938
1,004
1%
Max: 148,601

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Celeron 3755U maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #1860 of 1923
141
1%
Max: 20,979

About Intel Celeron 3755U

The Intel Celeron 3755U is a dual-core mobile processor from the Broadwell-U generation, launched on 2015-02-28 with a launch MSRP of $107. It runs at a fixed 1700 MHz base clock with no boost, and its 15W TDP places it in the low-power segment. Benchmark data shows it sits at the 2nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it is among the slowest processors ever measured. With an average benchmark score of 345, it matches the performance of several older desktop parts.

Who Should Consider It

Given the 2nd percentile ranking and the low absolute scores, the Celeron 3755U is aimed at very basic computing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 1004 and single-core score of 141 place it far below the median, so it will handle only light office work, web browsing, and document editing. The dual-core, dual-thread design with a 1700 MHz base clock means that simultaneous tasks, such as running a video call while editing a spreadsheet, will likely cause noticeable slowdowns. Users who require a machine for occasional, simple use might find it acceptable, but anyone with more than one active application should look elsewhere. The integrated Intel HD graphics can output to a display, but the CPU's performance ceiling is the bottleneck for any graphics-accelerated workload.

Power and Thermals

The Celeron 3755U has a TDP of 15 watts, which classifies it as a low-power part. This allows for a compact thermal solution; a simple heat sink and a small fan are sufficient to keep it within operating limits. The 14nm manufacturing process contributes to the modest power draw, and the 1,300 million transistors on an 82 mm² die are arranged in a power-efficient manner. The low TDP also means that the processor can be used in thin-and-light chassis without aggressive cooling. However, because the chip is soldered (BGA 1168), the cooling solution is not user-replaceable in most cases. The data shows a processor that generates minimal heat, which is a key consideration for mobile designs.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark results show a processor that is consistently at the bottom of the performance spectrum. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 101; in R20, it is 421 multicore and 59 single-core; in R23, it is 1004 multicore and 141 single-core. These numbers are all extremely low, but they follow a pattern: the multi-threaded scores are roughly 7 times the single-threaded scores in R23 (1004 vs 141), which is expected for a two-core part. The average benchmark score of 345 places it at the 2nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning 98% of tested processors are faster. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Celeron 3755U is essentially tied with the AMD A4-3330MX (0% delta) and the Intel Pentium E6600 and E5800 (both -0.1% delta), while being 0.5% behind the Pentium E6500. These deltas are negligible, so the Celeron offers no meaningful performance advantage over these older parts. In absolute terms, the R23 multicore score of 1004 is insufficient for modern productivity suites that rely on multiple cores.

How It Compares

AMD A4-3330MX: The average benchmark scores are identical (345 vs 345, 0% delta). This means the Celeron 3755U and the A4-3330MX deliver the same overall performance in the aggregated benchmark suite. The A4 is a dual-core part as well, but the Celeron's newer architecture does not translate into a speed advantage.

Intel Pentium E6600: The Celeron is 0.1% slower than this Pentium (delta -0.1%). The difference is within rounding error, so the two are effectively equal. The Pentium E6600 is a desktop chip, but the benchmark data does not differentiate by platform.

Intel Pentium E5800: Also 0.1% slower than the Celeron. Again, a negligible difference. The Celeron's 14nm process and lower power draw do not yield a performance edge.

Intel Pentium E6500: The Celeron is 0.5% faster than this part (delta 0.5%). This is the largest gap among the nearest rivals, but still a rounding error in real-world terms. The data shows a 0.5% higher average score, but the difference is negligible.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Celeron 3755U?

A: The TDP is 15 watts.

Q: Does it support dual-channel memory?

A: Yes, it supports dual-channel DDR3 memory with a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the socket type?

A: It uses Intel BGA 1168, which is a soldered socket.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not possible.

Q: What is the production status?

A: It is end-of-life.

Q: What is the release date?

A: It was released on 2015-02-28.

Platform and Compatibility

The Celeron 3755U is built on the Broadwell-U architecture and uses the Intel BGA 1168 socket, which means it is permanently attached to the motherboard. This eliminates any upgrade path for the CPU itself. Memory support is limited to DDR3 in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. The processor does not support ECC memory. For expansion, it provides PCIe Gen 2 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics is Intel HD, which can drive displays but is not intended for gaming. The 14nm process and 1,300 million transistors on an 82 mm² die are historical data points. Given the end-of-life status, this platform is obsolete, and users should not plan for future compatibility.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 59 is exceptionally low, and the R23 single-core score of 141 is similarly weak. This indicates that per-thread performance is a severe limitation. The multi-core scores (421 in R20, 1004 in R23) are higher, but only because they use both cores; with just two threads, the scaling is limited. The ratio of multi-core to single-core in R23 is roughly 7:1 (1004 vs 141), which seems large but is typical for a dual-core part with low per-core performance. In real-world terms, applications that rely on a single thread, such as many legacy programs or some web browsers, will feel sluggish. Multi-threaded workloads that can use two threads will see a modest improvement, but the absolute performance is still far below what modern software expects. The data suggests that the Celeron 3755U is best suited for a single foreground task, with minimal background activity.

The AMD Equivalent of Celeron 3755U

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

AMD • 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Celeron 3755U Comparisons

See how the Celeron 3755U stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Celeron 3755U with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs