AMD PRO A6-8570E

The AMD PRO A6-8570E is a desktop processor with 2 cores and 2 threads, based on the Excavator architecture (codename Carrizo) and manufactured on a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It runs at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The processor includes a Radeon R5 integrated GPU and supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration. In the benchmark database, it achieves an average score of 483, placing it in the 8th percentile of all CPUs. This position indicates that the PRO A6-8570E is a very low-performance part, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score.

Benchmark Performance

The average benchmark score of 483 places the AMD PRO A6-8570E in the 8th percentile of all CPUs. This is an extremely low ranking, meaning that the overwhelming majority of processors outperform it. The score is derived from a suite of Cinebench tests: R15 multi-core at 141, R20 multi-core at 589, R20 single-core at 83, R23 multi-core at 1404, and R23 single-core at 198. These numbers are consistently low, confirming the processor's position at the bottom of the performance hierarchy.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the PRO A6-8570E shows no meaningful advantage. The Intel Celeron G1840T scores 484, a 0.3% difference. The Intel Core M-5Y10 and Intel Core i3-560 each score 480, with deltas of 0.5% and 0.7% respectively. The AMD A6 PRO-7400B scores 479, a 0.8% difference. All of these delta percentages are less than one point, meaning the PRO A6-8570E is effectively tied with every one of its closest competitors. The data shows a cluster of processors that are statistically indistinguishable in performance, and the PRO A6-8570E is firmly within that cluster. The average score of 483 is an aggregate of the Cinebench tests, and it aligns closely with the scores of its rivals, all of which fall between 479 and 484. This narrow range indicates that the PRO A6-8570E is not differentiated from its peers in any meaningful way.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Cinebench results reveal a significant imbalance between single-thread and multi-thread performance, though both are weak. In Cinebench R20, the single-core score is 83, while the multi-core score is 589. In R23, the single-core score is 198, and the multi-core score is 1404. The multi-core scores are substantially higher than the single-core scores, which is expected for a dual-core processor. However, the absolute values are very low. The single-core score of 198 in R23 is below the threshold for smooth modern application performance. This indicates that the Excavator architecture, despite its 3.40 GHz boost clock, delivers poor instructions per clock.

The multi-thread behavior is equally constrained. With only two cores and two threads, the processor cannot take advantage of parallel processing beyond a dual-core workload. The R23 multi-core score of 1404 is a low figure, reflecting the lack of cores and the weak per-core performance. For real-world workloads, this means that single-threaded applications—such as word processors, web browsers, and spreadsheet tools—will feel sluggish, especially when multiple tabs or documents are open. Multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will also suffer, as the processor simply does not have the computational resources to handle them efficiently. The split between single and multi is not a balanced one; both are at the bottom of the scale, making the PRO A6-8570E unsuitable for any performance-sensitive workload.

How It Compares

Intel Celeron G1840T: The Celeron G1840T averages 484, a 0.3% advantage over the PRO A6-8570E. This difference is negligible, and the two processors are effectively identical in performance. Both are dual-core parts with similar low clock speeds, and the benchmark data reflects that they occupy the same performance tier.

Intel Core M-5Y10: The Core M-5Y10 scores 480, which is 0.5% lower than the PRO A6-8570E. This is a marginal difference, and the two are in the same class. The Core M-5Y10 is a low-power mobile chip, yet it matches the desktop PRO A6-8570E, underscoring the latter's weak showing.

Intel Core i3-560: The Core i3-560, an older dual-core with Hyper-Threading, scores 480, 0.7% lower. Despite being from an earlier generation, the i3-560 manages to keep pace with the PRO A6-8570E. This further illustrates that the Excavator-based chip offers no generational advantage.

AMD A6 PRO-7400B: The AMD A6 PRO-7400B scores 479, 0.8% lower. This is another Excavator-based part, and the PRO A6-8570E edges it out by less than one point. The two are essentially siblings in performance, with the 8570E having a slight lead.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD PRO A6-8570E use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket AM4.

Q: What memory type is supported?

A: It supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s.

Q: Does it have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon R5 integrated GPU.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked.

Q: What is the process node?

A: It is manufactured on a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries.

Q: Does it support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported.

Power and Thermals

The AMD PRO A6-8570E has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts. This is a moderate power envelope for a desktop processor, typical of entry-level parts. The 65W rating means that a standard air cooler, such as the one included with many retail boxes, is sufficient to dissipate the heat generated under load. The processor is based on a 28 nm process with 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die, which is a relatively large die for a dual-core. The power draw is not extreme, and the locked multiplier prevents overclocking, so thermal requirements remain within the specified TDP. In practice, the low performance of the chip means it rarely sustains high power consumption, as the cores are not heavily loaded in most applications. The absence of ECC support further indicates that this is not intended for prolonged, high-stress server workloads.

Who Should Consider It

Given the 8th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 483, the PRO A6-8570E is suitable only for basic computing tasks. For office workloads such as word processing, spreadsheet management, and email, the dual-core design with a 3.00 GHz base clock can handle these light duties, though response times will be noticeably slower than modern CPUs. For gaming, the low single-thread and multi-thread scores indicate that it is not viable for any current titles; even the integrated Radeon R5 GPU is not sufficient for demanding graphics. For content creation, the multi-core scores of 1404 in Cinebench R23 are far below what is needed for video editing or 3D rendering. This processor is best suited for a secondary PC, a basic web-browsing machine, or a legacy system where performance is not a priority. Users who need to run simple productivity software or access the internet will find it adequate, but anyone with more demanding needs should look elsewhere.

Platform and Compatibility

The PRO A6-8570E fits into the AMD Socket AM4 platform. It supports dual-channel DDR3 memory, which is an older memory standard compared to the DDR4 commonly used on other AM4 boards. The memory bandwidth is 34.1 GB/s, which is modest. PCIe Gen 3 is supported, allowing for standard expansion cards. ECC memory is not supported, so it is not aimed at server or workstation environments. The socket AM4 is a long-lived platform, but this particular processor is at the low end. Its production status is active, meaning it is still manufactured, but the architecture (Excavator) is from an older generation. For users looking to upgrade, the AM4 socket offers a range of newer processors, but the PRO A6-8570E itself provides no headroom for performance improvements beyond its stock configuration. The cache configuration includes 160 KB of L1 and 1 MB of shared L2, with no L3 cache, which further limits its performance potential.