AMD A10-5750M

The AMD A10-5750M is a 4-core, 4-thread mobile processor in the Richland generation, built on Piledriver architecture at 32 nm. Its Geekbench results are 309 in single-core and 679 in multi-core, producing an average benchmark score of 494 and a 9th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. That comparison data places this chip at the low end of the performance distribution, directly alongside a small cluster of older AMD and Intel parts.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The single-core score of 309 is the weaker half of the A10-5750M’s performance profile. Lightly threaded work, which still dominates many desktop and office tasks, is limited most directly by that number. Applications that depend on a single main thread will not get much help from the rest of the chip, so the 309 score is the more honest predictor of interactive responsiveness.

The multi-core score of 679 is substantially higher. That result represents the chip’s ceiling when all 4 threads are kept busy. The difference between 309 and 679 is large enough to make threaded workloads meaningfully faster than single-threaded ones, but the absolute level of both scores remains low by database standards. For software that can spread work across 4 cores, the 679 number is the relevant one; for legacy or lightly threaded software, the 309 number dominates.

The processor has 4 cores and 4 threads, meaning no extra logical threads are available beyond the physical cores. The clock range is 2.50 base to 3.50 boost, which gives the chip a usable performance window under varying load. Cache is arranged per core: 128 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, with no L3 cache listed. That layout helps isolate per-thread data but provides no shared cache tier for frequent core-to-core communication. In real workloads, the split between 309 and 679 indicates a part that scales well enough with threaded batch work but does not excel in fast single-thread interaction.

Power and Thermals

The A10-5750M is rated at a 35 TDP, placing it in a low-power class for a 4-core processor. That is consistent with the mobile market segment, where chassis cooling is more constrained than in desktop towers. The manufacturing process is 32 nm, and the die measures 246 mm² with 1,178 million transistors. Those figures are useful for setting expectations about heat density and cooling needs.

Because the multiplier is locked, the thermal design target is stock operation, not overclocking. The integrated Radeon HD 8650G shares the package, so the cooling solution must account for graphics load as well as CPU load. A standard mobile cooling solution built around a 35 TDP-class socket FS1r2 platform should be enough for this part. The data does not suggest that a high-end cooler is required, but the 32 nm process means the chip is not as power-lean as later nodes. The absence of a shared L3 cache also reduces the thermal footprint of sustained all-core work, since the cache hierarchy is limited to the per-core L1 and L2 arrays.

Benchmark Performance

The average benchmark score of 494 defines the A10-5750M’s overall standing. At the 9th percentile of all CPUs, the chip sits near the bottom of the performance list. Geekbench single-core performance is 309, while Geekbench multi-core performance is 679. The multi-core score shows that the processor can combine its 4 threads for a noticeable gain over its single-thread result, but the overall percentile confirms that the gain still lands in low-end territory.

The nearest-rival deltas are small enough to be treated as ties. The AMD A6-6400K records an average score of 494 with a 0% delta. The AMD PRO A4-8350B also records 494 with a 0% delta. The AMD PRO A6-9500E records 493 with a 0.1% delta, and the Intel Core i3-2120T records 491 with a 0.6% delta. The entire rival group sits within 0.6% of the A10-5750M in aggregate score. In benchmark terms, the A10-5750M is not meaningfully faster or slower than any of these four chips.

How It Compares

AMD A6-6400K.

The A6-6400K is the exact aggregate twin of the A10-5750M in this data. Both have an average benchmark score of 494, with a 0% delta. In the database, they occupy the same performance slot, and a user moving between them would not gain any meaningful average CPU throughput.

AMD PRO A4-8350B.

The AMD PRO A4-8350B is another exact match, with a 494 average score and a 0% delta. The benchmark data does not separate the A10-5750M from this rival. In aggregate performance, they are effectively interchangeable, which makes the comparison more about platform-level features than raw CPU results.

AMD PRO A6-9500E.

The AMD PRO A6-9500E sits at a 493 average score, with a 0.1% delta from the A10-5750M. That is the smallest nonzero gap in the nearest-rivals list, and the A10-5750M holds the higher average. In practical terms, the two parts are nearly indistinguishable in the benchmark data.

Intel Core i3-2120T.

The Intel Core i3-2120T is the closest Intel part in the nearest-rivals list, with a 491 average score and a 0.6% delta. The A10-5750M has the higher average score, but a 0.6% margin is still very narrow. The data places these chips in the same aggregate performance tier.

Platform and Compatibility

The A10-5750M uses AMD Socket FS1r2, and the market segment is listed as Mobile. That points toward laptop or compact mobile systems rather than standard desktop builds. Memory support is DDR3 only, and ECC is not supported, so the platform is aimed at conventional consumer DDR3 memory. The data does not include a PCIe specification, so expansion and discrete-GPU connectivity cannot be characterized from these records.

The integrated Radeon HD 8650G provides a built-in graphics path, which is important for a mobile platform where a separate graphics processor may not be installed. The multiplier is locked, so CPU frequency is not intended for user adjustment. The cache hierarchy is per-core: 128 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with no L3 cache listed. Any processor upgrade must stay within the FS1r2 socket, and because the socket is tied to mobile systems, the upgrade path is narrower than on a desktop platform. Memory upgrades are also constrained to DDR3 modules, given the supported memory type.

Who Should Consider It

The A10-5750M is best suited for basic mobile workloads. Its 9th percentile ranking and 494 average score make it a poor match for demanding gaming, heavy 3D rendering, or long video encodes. The multi-core score of 679 is too low for content creation tasks that scale across all cores, and the single-core score of 309 is more relevant to office tasks such as document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. A 4-thread chip running between 2.50 and 3.50 can handle light multitasking, but it will not feel fast when a single heavy thread dominates.

For gaming, the integrated Radeon HD 8650G gives the platform a graphics output, but the low CPU standing limits the experience to undemanding or older titles. For creation workloads, the 679 multi-core score is a clear warning that prolonged all-core work will be slow. The most practical use case for the A10-5750M is maintaining or rebuilding an FS1r2 mobile system that needs a 35 TDP-class 4-core part with integrated graphics. Users looking for high multi-thread throughput or high single-thread responsiveness should look well above the 9th percentile.