AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 in terms of core count and threading?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads. This means the AMD part supports simultaneous multithreading, effectively doubling its thread count, whereas the Qualcomm part operates with one thread per core.

Q: What are the clock speed specifications for both processors?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no listed boost clock in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, which is significantly higher than the Ryzen 5 240's 89.6 GB/s. The Qualcomm part also uses LPDDR5X memory, while the AMD part uses DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for both chips?

A: Both processors are manufactured on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The Ryzen 5 240 uses AMD's Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 uses Qualcomm's Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation.

Q: How do the cache hierarchies differ between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics are present on each processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 features a Radeon 760M integrated GPU. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 features an Adreno X1-45 integrated GPU.

The Verdict

The database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 240 across multiple tests, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the dataset. This creates an asymmetric comparison. The Ryzen 5 240 sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33,542. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of measured results.

For users who need verified performance data, the Ryzen 5 240 is the only option with recorded results. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H with an average score of 33,537 (0% difference), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and Ryzen 5 7645HX both at 33,667 (-0.4% difference), and the Intel Core i5-12600HX at 33,375 (+0.5% difference). These comparisons show the Ryzen 5 240 performing essentially on par with a higher-tier Intel H-series chip and slightly behind two AMD Ryzen 7000/8000 series parts.

The Snapdragon X1P-42-100, with 8 cores but no boost clock listed and no benchmark data, cannot be positioned against the Ryzen 5 240 based on measured performance. The data shows no head-to-head benchmarks, no wins for either side, and no rival scores for the Qualcomm part. Users requiring immediate performance validation should consider the Ryzen 5 240, as the database provides complete measurements. The Snapdragon part may offer architectural advantages in specific areas, but those remain unquantified in this dataset.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100. The wins counter for both processors is zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means a direct numerical comparison of these two specific processors is not possible from the recorded data.

What can be analyzed is the Ryzen 5 240's standalone benchmark suite. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 13,013 points, while in Cinebench R23 single-core it scores 1,742 points. The Cinebench R15 multicore result is 2,078 points, and the single-core result is 270 points. These scores place the Ryzen 5 240 in the upper quartile of all CPUs, as indicated by its 84th percentile ranking.

PassMark results for the Ryzen 5 240 show a multithread score of 22,658 and a single-thread score of 3,675. Integer math scores 73,189, floating-point math scores 45,301, and extended instructions score 20,201. Data compression scores 267,963, data encryption scores 15,849, find prime numbers scores 70, physics scores 1,060, and random string sorting scores 32,385.

Since the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no recorded benchmarks, the comparison cannot proceed beyond noting the absence of data. The Ryzen 5 240's performance profile can be contextualized against its nearest rivals, which show it within 0.5% of the Intel Core i5-12600HX and within 0.4% of the Ryzen 7 8840HS and Ryzen 5 7645HX. This indicates the Ryzen 5 240 delivers competitive multicore throughput for a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor.

Specification Differences

The Ryzen 5 240 and Snapdragon X1P-42-100 differ across multiple specification categories. The Ryzen 5 240 uses 6 cores with 12 threads, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 uses 8 cores with 8 threads. Base clocks are 4.30 GHz for the AMD part and 3.40 GHz for the Qualcomm part. The Ryzen 5 240 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no boost clock listed.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the Ryzen 5 240 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has a TDP of 30 watts. The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, whereas the Qualcomm processor uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. Memory support differs as well: the Ryzen 5 240 supports DDR5, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 supports LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part versus 135.2 GB/s for the Qualcomm part.

PCIe lanes also differ. The Ryzen 5 240 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are different: Radeon 760M for the AMD part, Adreno X1-45 for the Qualcomm part. Both processors have ECC memory support disabled and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Release dates show the Ryzen 5 240 launched on January 5, 2025, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 launched on August 27, 2024.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 5 240 is built on AMD's Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, placing it in the Ryzen 5 generation. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 uses Qualcomm's Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. Both are fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the AMD part reports 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, while the Qualcomm part has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

Cache architecture reveals fundamental design differences. The Ryzen 5 240 allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 allocates 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm cache layout uses a per-module L2 design, which reflects a different organization philosophy compared to AMD's per-core L2 allocation.

The Ryzen 5 240's thread count of 12, achieved through simultaneous multithreading on 6 cores, indicates a symmetric multithreading approach. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100's 8 threads on 8 cores indicates no multithreading support, meaning each core executes a single thread. This architectural difference affects how workloads scale: the AMD part can process more threads concurrently, while the Qualcomm part relies on raw core count.

The integrated GPU architectures also differ. The Radeon 760M is part of AMD's RDNA family, while the Adreno X1-45 is Qualcomm's GPU design. The database does not provide further architectural details on these GPU implementations.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the available data, the AMD Ryzen 5 240 is the only processor with measurable performance. Its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. The Ryzen 5 240 demonstrates strength in multithreaded workloads, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,013 and PassMark multithread score of 22,658. These results suggest the 6-core, 12-thread configuration handles parallel tasks effectively.

The Ryzen 5 240 also shows competence in single-threaded operations, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,742 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,675. The 5.00 GHz boost clock likely contributes to this performance, though the database does not provide direct causal analysis.

The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no benchmark scores, so it cannot be declared a winner in any category based on measured data. However, its specifications suggest potential advantages. The 8-core configuration could benefit workloads that scale across many physical cores without requiring multithreading. The higher memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s could improve memory-intensive applications. The lower 30-watt TDP indicates higher power efficiency, which matters for mobile battery life.

The LPDDR5X memory support on the Snapdragon part may provide faster memory access for integrated graphics and data-heavy tasks. The larger L1 cache per core (288 KB versus 64 KB) could reduce latency for frequently accessed data. The per-module L2 cache of 12 MB offers substantial capacity for localized data.

The Ryzen 5 240 wins in verified performance metrics, thread count, boost clock capability, and PCIe lane count. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 wins in core count, memory bandwidth, TDP efficiency, and L1 cache per core. Without benchmark results for the Qualcomm part, any performance-based comparison remains incomplete. Users seeking validated results should rely on the Ryzen 5 240's extensive benchmark suite. Users prioritizing power efficiency and memory bandwidth may find the Snapdragon specifications appealing, but the lack of measured data prevents confirmation of real-world advantages.