CPU Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

CORE STATE Lunar Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 30W
ARCHITECTURE Lunar Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon E-2436

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,583
1,853
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
301.5
261
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,069
7,723
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
997
1,090
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
10,178
18,389
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,950
2,596
passmark_data_compression
186,521
246,902
passmark_data_encryption
14,141
13,920
passmark_extended_instructions
15,613
16,334
passmark_find_prime_numbers
195
84
passmark_floating_point_math
59,536
50,198
passmark_integer_math
44,019
67,082
passmark_multithread
19,810
21,708
passmark_physics
1,637
1,353
passmark_random_string_sorting
22,622
28,363
passmark_single_thread
4,274
3,575
passmark_singlethread
4,274
3,575

Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Xeon E-2436

Throughout this direct evaluation, E-2436 (Intel) appears as the definite victor. The test figures indicate substantial leads in both productivity tests. Whether you're building a productivity build, E-2436 (Intel) provides more value per dollar. This CPU manages complex computations with efficiency. It's especially apparent in real-world usage.

The score delta between E-2436 (Intel) and the Intel Intel Core Ultra 9 288V turns particularly evident in multi-threaded tasks. Programs like 3D rendering demonstrate E-2436 (Intel)'s superiority. Its extra threads offer notable performance for demanding workloads. Such power results into quicker completion windows. Workflow benefits are tangible and substantial.

Game performance results additionally favor E-2436 (Intel) in this matchup. Improved performance and more stable performance result from its superior IPC capability. Those who game will observe enhanced gameplay, particularly in processor-intensive scenarios. This edge continues throughout various configurations. Fast-paced titles specifically profits from this capability superiority.

At the end of the day: E-2436 (Intel) secures this matchup decisively. Buyers valuing performance might strongly select E-2436 (Intel) over the Intel Intel Core Ultra 9 288V. This benchmark data demonstrates this conclusion. The tasks will benefit from the superior capabilities. This is a definite winner in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Ultra 9 288V
E-2436
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
8
12 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2.9 -12.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5 -2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2.9 -12.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5 -2.0%
Multiplier
33
29 -12.1%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
30
65 +116.7%
PL1
65 W
PL2
148 W
Architecture
Architecture
Lunar Lake
Raptor Lake
Codename
Lunar Lake
Raptor Lake-S
Generation
Ultra 9 (Lunar Lake)
Xeon E (Raptor Lake)
Process Size
3 nm
10 nm
Die Size
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
136.5 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 2833
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel C266, C262
PCIe
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
3.3 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 48 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Arc 140V
Other
Market
Mobile
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$331
Part Number
SRPMSSRPMWQ5JTQ5JUQ5KW
SRMXB
Package
FC-BGAEXX
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Intel DVA-B
View Core Ultra 9 288V Details View Xeon E-2436 Details