Intel Xeon E-2334 vs Intel Xeon W-2133 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Xeon W-2133 across every Cinebench iteration, though the margins are remarkably consistent and narrow. The W-2133 wins all six head-to-head comparisons, with deltas ranging from 3.3% to 3.4%. This is not a dominant victory; it is a series of small but uniform edges.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the W-2133 scores 1075 against the E-2334's 1041, a 3.3% advantage. The single-core test in R15 follows the same pattern: 151 versus 146, a 3.4% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 4483 for the W-2133 and 4339 for the E-2334, again a 3.3% gap. The R20 single-core test shows 632 versus 612, another 3.3% margin. In Cinebench R23, the multicore scores are 10676 and 10333, a 3.3% difference, while the single-core test records 1507 against 1458, a 3.4% edge.

The consistency of these deltas is striking. Every test lands within a tenth of a percentage point of 3.3% or 3.4%. This suggests the performance relationship between the two chips is stable across different workload intensities and rendering engines. The W-2133's advantage is not concentrated in one type of workload; it persists across both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests.

However, the absolute differences are small. In the most demanding test, Cinebench R23 multicore, the gap is only 343 points. In single-core R23, it is 49 points. These margins would be noticeable in a direct comparison but are unlikely to transform user experience in most real-world tasks. The data indicates a modest but real performance tier separation.

The average benchmark score tells a similar story. The W-2133 averages 3087 across all recorded benchmarks, while the E-2334 averages 2988. This is a 3.3% difference in overall compute capability, matching the head-to-head deltas. Both processors sit at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same performance class relative to the broader market.

Where Each One Wins

The W-2133 wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is straightforward: the W-2133 is the faster processor in all measured scenarios. Yet the nature of the wins matters. The W-2133 achieves its victory in multicore tests with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the E-2334 fields 4 cores and 8 threads. The W-2133's two additional cores and four additional threads provide the structural advantage that shows up across every Cinebench run.

For single-threaded workloads, the E-2334 has a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 3.90 GHz), but the W-2133 still wins. This indicates that the W-2133's Skylake architecture, despite its lower boost frequency, delivers superior per-clock performance in these specific Cinebench tests. The E-2334's higher boost clock is not enough to overcome the W-2133's architectural efficiency.

For multi-threaded workloads, the W-2133's core count advantage is the deciding factor. Two extra physical cores and four extra threads provide a meaningful parallel processing advantage in Cinebench's rendering workloads, which scale well with additional cores. The W-2133 also benefits from a larger L3 cache (8.25 MB shared versus 8 MB shared) and a more substantial L2 cache (1 MB per core versus 512 KB per core), which can aid in cache-sensitive workloads.

The E-2334, despite losing all benchmarks, should not be dismissed. Its 65 W TDP is less than half of the W-2133's 140 W TDP. In power-constrained environments or systems where cooling is limited, the E-2334's efficiency could make it the practical choice even though it trails in raw performance. The data does not include power efficiency benchmarks, but the TDP figures alone suggest a significant operational difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and are built for different platforms. The W-2133 uses the Skylake-W architecture on a 14 nm process node, with a die size of 484 mm². It fits into Intel Socket 2066 and belongs to the Xeon W series. The E-2334 uses the Rocket Lake-E architecture, also on a 14 nm node, but with a smaller die size of 276 mm². It fits into Intel Socket 1200 and belongs to the Xeon E-2300 series.

The core and cache configurations differ substantially. The W-2133 has 6 cores and 12 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8.25 MB of shared L3 cache. The E-2334 has 4 cores and 8 threads, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The W-2133's per-core L2 cache is double that of the E-2334, while the E-2334 has a slightly larger L1 cache per core.

Memory support also diverges. The W-2133 supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with a peak bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. The E-2334 supports dual-channel DDR4 with a peak bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is a significant difference. The W-2133 can move data to and from memory at a much higher rate, which can benefit memory-intensive workloads beyond what the Cinebench tests capture.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The W-2133 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 48 lanes from the CPU, while the E-2334 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The E-2334 has a newer PCIe generation, offering higher per-lane bandwidth, but the W-2133 offers far more total lanes. For systems with many expansion cards or high-bandwidth peripherals, the W-2133's lane count is advantageous. For newer devices that use PCIe Gen 4, the E-2334's support is beneficial.

Both processors support ECC memory and lack integrated graphics. Both have locked multipliers. The W-2133 was released on 2017-08-28 and is end-of-life, while the E-2334 was released on 2021-09-07 and remains active. The W-2133's launch MSRP is $617, and the E-2334's launch MSRP is $250.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Xeon W-2133 outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2334 in every recorded Cinebench test. The margins range from 3.3% to 3.4%, which is consistent and measurable. If raw CPU rendering performance is the sole criterion, the W-2133 is the clear choice.

However, the data also reveals a narrow gap. A 3.3% average difference between two processors is relatively small, and in many real-world workflows, users may not perceive a meaningful distinction. The W-2133's advantage comes from its additional cores and threads, larger caches, and quad-channel memory support, all of which contribute to its higher scores.

The E-2334 has its own strengths. Its 65 W TDP is substantially lower, making it more suitable for power-sensitive or thermally constrained deployments. Its PCIe Gen 4 support is newer, and its smaller die size suggests lower manufacturing complexity. But in terms of the recorded Cinebench benchmarks, the E-2334 does not win a single test.

Users who prioritize maximum multi-threaded rendering performance, have workloads that benefit from quad-channel memory bandwidth, or require many PCIe lanes should favor the W-2133. Users who need a lower-power processor, prefer a newer platform with PCIe Gen 4, or require only dual-channel memory should consider the E-2334. The data does not support a performance-based argument for the E-2334, but its efficiency profile may be decisive for specific deployments.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 wins all three single-core Cinebench tests. It scores 151 versus 146 in R15, 632 versus 612 in R20, and 1507 versus 1458 in R23, with deltas of 3.4% or 3.3%.

Q: How do the multicore scores compare?

A: The W-2133 leads in every multicore test. In R15, it scores 1075 against 1041. In R20, it scores 4483 against 4339. In R23, it scores 10676 against 10333. All differences are 3.3%.

Q: What are the core counts of each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2133 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Xeon E-2334 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2334 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the W-2133's 3.90 GHz. Despite this, the W-2133 still wins all single-core benchmarks.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon W-2133 and the Intel Xeon E-2334 support ECC memory. Both also lack integrated graphics.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The W-2133 supports quad-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s peak bandwidth. The E-2334 supports dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s peak bandwidth.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Xeon W-2133 | Intel Xeon E-2334 |

|-------|-------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.90 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 140 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 2066 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Skylake | Rocket Lake |

| Codename | Skylake-W | Rocket Lake-E |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 484 mm² | 276 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8.25 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 48 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Release Date | 2017-08-28 | 2021-09-07 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Launch MSRP | $617 | $250 |

| Part Number | SR3LL | SRKN6 |