CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon E-2324G
Xeon E5-4627 v3
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Xeon E-2324G vs Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3
The Intel Xeon E-2324G and Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 represent two distinct eras of Intel server silicon, separated by six years of architectural evolution. The E-2324G is a modern 4-core Rocket Lake-E part built on Intel's 14 nm process, while the E5-4627 v3 is a 10-core Haswell-EP processor from the older 22 nm generation. Despite the newer process and higher clock speeds of the E-2324G, the benchmark data consistently shows the older E5-4627 v3 pulling ahead in every single head-to-head test, leveraging its superior core count and thread count to dominate across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.
Where Each One Wins
The performance split between these two processors is stark. The data from the head-to-head benchmark suite shows the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 winning all six comparison tests, leaving the Intel Xeon E-2324G without a single victory. This is a clean sweep where the older, higher-core-count chip outperforms the newer part across the board. The E5-4627 v3 holds an advantage in every workload category, from single-core tasks like Cinebench R15 single-core to heavily parallel workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core.
For the E-2324G, there is no benchmark category where it emerges victorious. Its strengths lie outside the measured tests: it offers integrated UHD Graphics P750, which the E5-4627 v3 lacks entirely, and it supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes compared to the E5-4627 v3's PCIe Gen 3 with 40 lanes. The E-2324G also has a significantly lower TDP of 65 watts versus 135 watts, making it a more power-conscious choice for compact server or workstation builds. However, in terms of raw compute performance as measured by the benchmark suite, the E5-4627 v3 is the definitive winner.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gap between these two Xeons is substantial. The Intel Xeon E-2324G is built on Rocket Lake-E architecture using a 14 nm process node, with a die size of 276 mm². It features 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The E-2324G uses the Intel Socket 1200 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics P750 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.
In contrast, the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 is based on the older Haswell-EP architecture, manufactured on a 22 nm process with a much larger die size of 356 mm² and 2,600 million transistors. It doubles the core count to 10 cores and 20 threads, though at lower clock speeds of 2.60 GHz base and 3.20 GHz boost. The cache configuration is different as well: 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a much larger 25 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor uses the Intel Socket 2011-3 and supports quad-channel DDR4 memory, yielding a higher memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. It has no integrated graphics and offers 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. The E5-4627 v3 is marked as end-of-life production status, while the E-2324G remains active.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark results reveal a consistent pattern of the E5-4627 v3 outperforming the E-2324G by roughly 8.8% across most tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the E5-4627 v3 scores 971 against the E-2324G's 886, an 8.8% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar margin: 137 for the E5-4627 v3 versus 125 for the E-2324G, also an 8.8% difference.
Moving to Cinebench R20, the results mirror this trend. The multi-core test gives the E5-4627 v3 a score of 4049 compared to 3694 for the E-2324G, an 8.8% lead. In single-core R20, the E5-4627 v3 scores 571 while the E-2324G manages 521, again an 8.8% gap. The pattern holds through Cinebench R23 as well: multi-core scores are 9642 for the E5-4627 v3 versus 8797 for the E-2324G, and single-core scores are 1361 versus 1242, with deltas of 8.8% and 8.7% respectively.
The most striking finding is that the E5-4627 v3 wins the single-core tests despite having a significantly lower boost clock of 3.20 GHz compared to the E-2324G's 4.60 GHz. This suggests that the older Haswell architecture, with its larger 25 MB L3 cache and different core design, delivers better instructions-per-clock performance in these specific workloads. The E-2324G's higher clock speed of 4.60 GHz cannot compensate for the architectural advantages of the E5-4627 v3 in these tests.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads.
Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?
A: The E5-4627 v3 scores 9642, which is 8.8% higher than the E-2324G's score of 8797.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2324G and the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G includes UHD Graphics P750, while the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 has no integrated graphics.
Q: What are the socket requirements for each processor?
A: The E-2324G uses Intel Socket 1200, while the E5-4627 v3 uses Intel Socket 2011-3.
Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?
A: The E5-4627 v3 has a memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s with quad-channel DDR4, compared to the E-2324G's 51.2 GB/s with dual-channel DDR4.
Specification Differences
The specification differences between these two processors are extensive, reflecting their different generations and market positions.
Cores and Threads: The E5-4627 v3 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads.
Clock Speeds: The E-2324G has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The E5-4627 v3 has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz.
TDP: The E-2324G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the E5-4627 v3 has a TDP of 135 watts.
Socket: The E-2324G uses Intel Socket 1200, while the E5-4627 v3 uses Intel Socket 2011-3.
Architecture and Process: The E-2324G is based on Rocket Lake architecture on a 14 nm process with a 276 mm² die size. The E5-4627 v3 is based on Haswell-EP architecture on a 22 nm process with a 356 mm² die size and 2,600 million transistors.
Cache: The E-2324G has 80 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with 8 MB shared L3. The E5-4627 v3 has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, with 25 MB shared L3.
Memory: The E-2324G supports dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The E5-4627 v3 supports quad-channel DDR4 with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth.
PCIe: The E-2324G provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 4, while the E5-4627 v3 provides 40 lanes of PCIe Gen 3.
Integrated Graphics: The E-2324G includes UHD Graphics P750; the E5-4627 v3 has none.
Production Status: The E-2324G is active, while the E5-4627 v3 is end-of-life.
Release Date: The E-2324G was released on 2021-09-07, while the E5-4627 v3 was released on 2015-05-31.
Part Number: The E-2324G has part number SRKN7, and the E5-4627 v3 has part number SR22Q.
Launch MSRP: The E-2324G has a launch MSRP of $209, and the E5-4627 v3 has a launch MSRP of $2225.