CPU Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking finding in this comparison is not which processor wins, but how close the race actually is. Across every single benchmark in the head-to-head set, the Intel Xeon E-2288G edges out the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 by a margin of 0% delta. That is not a typo; the benchmark data shows identical or near-identical scores across six Cinebench tests, despite the two chips having radically different core counts and clock speeds.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, both processors score exactly 1493 points. The E-2288G is awarded the win in the dataset, but the deltaPct is 0, meaning the performance is effectively indistinguishable. The same pattern holds in Cinebench R15 single-core, where both chips record 210 points. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore scores are 6223 for the E-2288G versus 6222 for the E5-4669 v3, a one-point difference that rounds to 0% delta. Single-core in R20 shows identical scores of 878 for both.

Cinebench R23 tells the same story. In multicore, the E-2288G scores 14817 against the E5-4669 v3's 14815, again a 0% delta. In single-core, both processors post 2091 points exactly. The E-2288G wins all six head-to-head tests in the dataset, but the wins are nominal; the actual performance gap is zero in every case.

What makes this remarkable is the underlying hardware difference. The E-2288G packs 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The E5-4669 v3 offers 18 cores and 36 threads but runs at just 2.10 GHz base and 2.90 GHz boost. In theory, the E5-4669 v3's extra 10 cores and 20 threads should dominate multi-threaded workloads. In practice, the benchmarks show the E-2288G's higher clock speeds compensate entirely for its lower core count, at least within these Cinebench workloads.

# Where Each One Wins

The data reveals a nuanced picture when considering what each processor is optimized for. The E-2288G wins all six benchmark tests in the head-to-head comparison, but with 0% deltas, the practical difference is negligible. However, the broader benchmark dataset provides additional context.

The E-2288G has a Geekbench multicore score of 7639 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1632. The E5-4669 v3 does not have Geekbench scores in the dataset, so direct comparison is limited to Cinebench. The E-2288G also has a higher average benchmark score of 4373 compared to the E5-4669 v3's 4285, representing a roughly 2% advantage in the aggregate metric.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each chip provides further insight. The E-2288G's closest competitor is the AMD EPYC 7232P, which scores 4354 on average, a 0.4% delta from the E-2288G's 4373. The E5-4669 v3's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G at 4296, a -0.3% delta from its 4285. Both chips sit at the 58th percentile of all CPUs, indicating they occupy a similar performance tier despite their architectural differences.

For single-threaded workloads, the E-2288G's 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a clear theoretical advantage, though the benchmark data shows identical single-core scores. For multi-threaded workloads, the E5-4669 v3's 18 cores and 36 threads should theoretically win, yet the Cinebench multicore scores are essentially tied. The E-2288G edges ahead in every measured test, but the margins are so small they fall within measurement noise.

# Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two Xeon processors is substantial. The E-2288G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically Coffee Lake-S WS, built on a 14 nm process with a die size of 180 mm². The E5-4669 v3 uses the Haswell architecture, specifically Haswell-EP, built on a 22 nm process with a much larger die size of 662 mm². The 8 nm process node advantage for the E-2288G allows for higher clock speeds and better power efficiency per core.

Cache configurations differ significantly. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. However, the L3 cache is where they diverge: the E-2288G has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while the E5-4669 v3 offers 45 MB of shared L3 cache. The E5-4669 v3's larger cache is typical for a processor with more cores, as each core needs access to more shared data.

Memory support shows another key difference. Both support DDR4 memory and ECC, but the E-2288G uses a dual-channel memory bus with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the E5-4669 v3 uses a quad-channel memory bus with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth. The E5-4669 v3's higher memory bandwidth is a significant advantage for memory-intensive workloads, even if the Cinebench scores do not reflect it.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The E-2288G provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the E5-4669 v3 provides Gen 3 with 40 lanes (CPU only). The E5-4669 v3's additional PCIe lanes make it more suitable for systems with many expansion cards or GPUs.

The E-2288G includes integrated graphics in the form of HD Graphics P630, while the E5-4669 v3 has no integrated graphics. This means the E-2288G can power a display without a discrete GPU, while the E5-4669 v3 requires one.

The E-2288G uses the Intel Socket 1151, while the E5-4669 v3 uses the Intel Socket 2011-3. These are incompatible sockets, so they cannot be used in the same motherboards.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 18 cores and 36 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2288G has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Are the benchmark scores identical between the two?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R15 multicore both score 1493, in R15 single-core both score 210, in R20 multicore the E-2288G scores 6223 versus 6222 for the E5-4669 v3, in R20 single-core both score 878, in R23 multicore the E-2288G scores 14817 versus 14815, and in R23 single-core both score 2091. All deltas are 0%.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2288G has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to 2.90 GHz for the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3.

Q: Does the E5-4669 v3 have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has no integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon E-2288G includes HD Graphics P630.

Q: Which processor supports more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 supports 68.3 GB/s via a quad-channel memory bus, while the Intel Xeon E-2288G supports 42.7 GB/s via a dual-channel bus.

Q: What are the release dates for these processors?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2288G was released on 2019-05-28, and the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 was released on 2015-05-31.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2288G | Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 18 |

| Threads | 16 | 36 |

| Base Clock | 3.70 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| TDP | 95 W | 135 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 2011-3 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Haswell |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Haswell-EP |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 22 nm |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 662 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 45 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 40 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | None |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2015-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $539 | $7007 |

# The Verdict

The benchmark data presents an unusual verdict: despite vastly different hardware configurations, these two processors deliver essentially identical performance in the Cinebench workloads measured. The Intel Xeon E-2288G wins all six head-to-head tests, but with 0% deltas, the practical performance difference is zero.

For users prioritizing single-threaded performance, the E-2288G is the clear choice based on its 5.00 GHz boost clock and higher single-core scores, even though those scores are identical to the E5-4669 v3's in the data. For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the E5-4669 v3's 18 cores and 36 threads suggest it should win, yet the multicore benchmarks show a tie. The E5-4669 v3's advantages lie in its 45 MB L3 cache, quad-channel memory with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and 40 PCIe lanes, features that matter for memory-heavy and expansion-heavy server workloads but did not translate to higher Cinebench scores.

The E-2288G offers integrated graphics, a smaller die, lower TDP of 95 W versus 135 W, and a significantly lower launch MSRP of $539 versus $7007 for the E5-4669 v3. Both processors sit at the 58th percentile of all CPUs and are end-of-life products.

The verdict from the data: the E-2288G is the more balanced and efficient choice, offering comparable performance with lower power consumption, integrated graphics, and a fraction of the launch price. The E5-4669 v3 only makes sense if the specific requirements are many cores, large L3 cache, quad-channel memory, or abundant PCIe lanes, features that the Cinebench benchmarks do not capture. For most workloads represented by these benchmarks, the two processors are functionally equivalent, and the E-2288G's lower TDP and integrated graphics make it the more practical selection.