Intel Xeon E-2286M vs Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 Comparison

The Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 and the Intel Xeon E-2286M are both end-of-life server and workstation processors, but they target very different physical and power envelopes. The E5-2698B v3 is a 16-core Haswell-EP part for Socket 2011-3, while the E-2286M is an 8-core Coffee Lake-H mobile-class chip on BGA 1440. In the database's head-to-head Cinebench results, the E5-2698B v3 wins every single test, with a consistent lead of about 7.7% to 7.8% across multi-core and single-core workloads. That outcome is surprising given the E-2286M's much higher boost clock, and it sets the stage for a comparison that hinges on core count, memory bandwidth, and power efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six Cinebench comparisons between these two CPUs, and the E5-2698B v3 takes all six. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the E5-2698B v3 scores 1395 against 1295 for the E-2286M, a 7.7% advantage. The single-core R15 result is 196 versus 182, also a 7.7% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5814 for the E5-2698B v3 and 5396 for the E-2286M, again 7.7% ahead. The R20 single-core test shows 820 versus 761, a 7.8% margin. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core result is 13843 against 12848, a 7.7% gap, and the single-core result is 1954 versus 1813, a 7.8% lead.

These numbers are remarkably consistent. The E5-2698B v3 does not just win by a small margin in one test; it maintains a near-identical advantage across three generations of Cinebench and across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. That consistency suggests the performance difference is structural, not a quirk of a particular benchmark. The E-2286M has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, far higher than the E5-2698B v3's 3.40 GHz, yet it still loses single-core tests. The recorded data shows that raw clock speed alone does not overcome the architectural and core-count differences.

The E5-2698B v3 also holds a higher average benchmark score in the database: 4004 versus 3822 for the E-2286M. That places the E5-2698B v3 at the 57th percentile of all CPUs, while the E-2286M sits at the 56th percentile. The nearest rivals for the E5-2698B v3 include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G (4010, -0.2%) and the Intel Core i5-12400T (4019, -0.4%), while the E-2286M's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H (3820, 0%) and the Intel Core i7-8086K (3800, +0.6%). These comparisons show that both chips sit in a similar performance tier, but the E5-2698B v3 is consistently a few points ahead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architectures and process nodes. The E5-2698B v3 is built on Haswell-EP at 22 nm, with 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die. The E-2286M uses Coffee Lake-H at 14 nm, with a die size of 180 mm² and no transistor count listed in the database. The smaller process node gives the E-2286M a density advantage, but the E5-2698B v3 compensates with a much larger physical package and more cores.

Core and thread counts differ sharply. The E5-2698B v3 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the E-2286M has 8 cores and 16 threads. That doubling of cores is the primary driver of the multi-core performance gap. Cache also favors the E5-2698B v3: it has 40 MB of shared L3 cache, while the E-2286M has 16 MB. Both have the same per-core L1 (64 KB) and L2 (256 KB) cache, but the larger L3 on the E5-2698B v3 helps with data-heavy workloads.

Memory support is another major split. The E5-2698B v3 uses quad-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, while the E-2286M uses dual-channel DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, but the E5-2698B v3's wider memory bus gives it a substantial bandwidth advantage. PCIe connectivity also differs: the E5-2698B v3 provides 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the E-2286M provides 16 lanes. That makes the E5-2698B v3 better suited for systems with many expansion cards or NVMe drives.

The E-2286M includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P630), while the E5-2698B v3 has none. This is a key feature for systems that need a display output without a discrete GPU. The E-2286M also has a much lower TDP: 45 W versus 135 W for the E5-2698B v3. That power difference is enormous and directly affects cooling and system size. The sockets are incompatible: the E5-2698B v3 uses Intel Socket 2011-3, while the E-2286M uses BGA 1440, meaning the E-2286M is soldered to the board.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the E5-2698B v3 wins every Cinebench test in the head-to-head comparison. That includes both multi-core and single-core workloads, so it is the faster processor for rendering, compilation, and any CPU-bound task that scales with cores or benefits from higher per-core performance. The E5-2698B v3 also has a higher average benchmark score (4004 vs 3822) and a slightly higher percentile rank (57th vs 56th). For raw compute performance, the E5-2698B v3 is the clear choice.

The E-2286M, however, has advantages that are not captured in the Cinebench scores. Its 45 W TDP makes it suitable for compact, low-power systems where the 135 W E5-2698B v3 would require a larger cooler and more robust power delivery. The integrated UHD Graphics P630 means the E-2286M can drive a display without a separate GPU, which is useful for embedded or workstation applications where space is at a premium. The E-2286M also has a smaller die (180 mm² vs 356 mm²) and a newer process node (14 nm vs 22 nm), which may contribute to its power efficiency.

The E-2286M also has Geekbench scores recorded in the database: 6746 multi-core and 1537 single-core. The E5-2698B v3 does not have Geekbench results in the database, so a direct comparison is not possible. However, these numbers provide a reference point for the E-2286M's performance in other workloads. The E-2286M's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H (3820, 0%) and the Intel Core i7-8086K (3800, +0.6%), which are mainstream mobile and desktop parts, indicating that the E-2286M competes in a different performance class than the E5-2698B v3.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the database records.

| Specification | Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 | Intel Xeon E-2286M |

|----------------|------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 16 | 8 |

| Threads | 32 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 3.40 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 135 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Haswell-EP | Coffee Lake-H |

| Process node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Transistors | 2,600 million | Not listed |

| Die size | 356 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L3 cache | 40 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| PCIe lanes | 40 (Gen 3, CPU only) | 16 (Gen 3, CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | None | UHD Graphics P630 |

| Release date | Not listed | 2019-05-28 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $623 |

| Part number | SR21T | SRFCZ |

Both processors support DDR4 memory, have ECC support, and share the same per-core L1 and L2 cache sizes. They are both classified as Server/Workstation parts and are end-of-life. The E-2286M has a listed launch MSRP of $623, while the E5-2698B v3 has no MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2286M has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The E-2286M boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the E5-2698B v3 boosts to 3.40 GHz. Despite this, the E5-2698B v3 wins all single-core Cinebench tests in the head-to-head comparison.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The E5-2698B v3 has 40 MB of shared L3 cache, while the E-2286M has 16 MB.

Q: Which CPU supports integrated graphics?

A: Only the E-2286M has integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P630). The E5-2698B v3 has no integrated GPU.

Q: Which CPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The E5-2698B v3 has 68.3 GB/s with quad-channel DDR4, while the E-2286M has 42.7 GB/s with dual-channel DDR4.

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The E5-2698B v3 has an average score of 4004, compared to 3822 for the E-2286M.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3 outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2286M in every Cinebench test recorded in the database. It wins multi-core and single-core workloads by a consistent 7.7% to 7.8% margin, and it has a higher average benchmark score and percentile rank. For anyone building a system where raw CPU performance is the priority, the E5-2698B v3 is the better choice.

The E-2286M, however, is not without merit. Its 45 W TDP, integrated graphics, and smaller die make it suitable for compact, power-efficient systems where the E5-2698B v3's 135 W TDP and lack of iGPU would be problematic. The E-2286M also has a listed launch MSRP of $623, which may be relevant for procurement decisions, though the E5-2698B v3 has no MSRP in the database. If the workload fits within the E-2286M's 8-core, 16-thread limit and the system requires low power or onboard display output, the E-2286M is a viable option. But for pure compute throughput, the E5-2698B v3 is the winner according to the recorded benchmarks.