Intel Xeon D-1732TE vs Intel Xeon E-2236 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a clean sweep: the Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, though the margins are consistently narrow. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the D-1732TE scores 1214 against the E-2236's 1188, a 2.1% advantage. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern, with 171 versus 167, a 2.3% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the D-1732TE again leads in multi-core, 5061 to 4952, and in single-core, 714 to 698, both at a 2.2% delta. The R23 suite mirrors this exactly: multi-core shows 12052 against 11792, and single-core shows 1701 versus 1664, both again at a 2.2% difference.

What stands out is the consistency of the margin. Across every test, the D-1732TE holds a lead that hovers around 2% to 2.3%, never stretching beyond that narrow band. This suggests the performance gap is structural rather than workload-dependent. The E-2236, despite having fewer cores and a much higher boost clock, cannot overcome the D-1732TE's advantages in any measured workload. The average benchmark score tells the same story: the D-1732TE sits at 3486, while the E-2236 trails at 3410. That is a 76-point gap, roughly 2.2%, which aligns almost perfectly with the individual test deltas.

The percentile rankings place both processors at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they occupy the same tier in the overall performance distribution. Yet within that tier, the D-1732TE is consistently the stronger performer. The nearest rivals for each chip further contextualize the results. The E-2236's closest competitor is the Intel Xeon E-2146G, which matches its average score exactly at 3410, a 0% delta. The D-1732TE, meanwhile, sits just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900TE, which scores 3484. These comparisons show that both chips are tightly grouped with their peers, but the D-1732TE occupies a slightly higher spot in that grouping.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, covering multi-core and single-core runs in R15, R20, and R23. The Intel Xeon E-2236 wins zero.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: The D-1732TE leads by 2.1% in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 2.2% in R20 multi-core, and 2.2% in R23 multi-core. The average benchmark scores show a 2.2% overall difference, 3486 versus 3410.

Q: Does the E-2236 win any single-core tests?

A: No. The D-1732TE wins single-core tests by 2.3% in R15, 2.2% in R20, and 2.2% in R23. The E-2236's higher boost clock does not translate into a single-core victory.

Q: How do these processors compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The E-2236 exactly matches the Intel Xeon E-2146G at 3410 average score. The D-1732TE is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900TE, which scores 3484, and 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon E-2246G, which scores 3492.

Q: What are the launch MSRP values?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2236 has a launch MSRP of $284. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE has a launch MSRP of $730.

Q: Are both CPUs still in production?

A: No. The E-2236 is marked as end-of-life, while the D-1732TE is listed as active production.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The E-2236 is built on Coffee Lake, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant, using a 14 nm process node from Intel. The D-1732TE is based on Ice Lake, specifically Ice Lake-D, using a 10 nm process node, also from Intel. This node difference is significant, as the newer 10 nm process allows for higher transistor density and efficiency, which likely explains how the D-1732TE achieves better performance at a much lower TDP.

Core and cache configurations differ substantially. The E-2236 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the D-1732TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The E-2236 carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The D-1732TE has larger per-core caches, 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2, plus a shared 15 MB L3 cache. The D-1732TE's L2 cache is nearly five times larger per core, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access the same data.

The memory subsystems also diverge. The E-2236 uses dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The D-1732TE uses triple-channel memory with a bandwidth of 64.0 GB/s, a 50% increase in theoretical throughput. Both support DDR4 and ECC memory, but the D-1732TE's broader memory path gives it a clear advantage in memory-intensive tasks. PCIe support also differs: the E-2236 offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the D-1732TE offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes, doubling the per-lane bandwidth available for expansion devices.

The E-2236 includes integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics P630, while the D-1732TE has no integrated graphics at all. This makes the E-2236 a more self-contained option for systems that need display output without a discrete GPU. The sockets are incompatible as well, with the E-2236 using Intel Socket 1151 and the D-1732TE using Intel BGA 2227, the latter being a soldered, embedded-style package.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: the E-2236 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the D-1732TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds tell a contrasting story. The E-2236 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The D-1732TE has a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz. The E-2236's boost clock is 60% higher, yet this does not yield a win in any benchmark.

TDP is a major differentiator. The E-2236 draws 80 watts, while the D-1732TE draws only 52 watts, a 35% reduction in power consumption despite having two more cores. This efficiency gap likely stems from the newer 10 nm process. The socket types differ, as noted, and the process nodes differ, 14 nm versus 10 nm. Cache sizes differ across all levels, with the D-1732TE having larger L1, L2, and L3 caches. Memory bandwidth differs, 42.7 GB/s versus 64.0 GB/s, and memory channels differ, dual versus triple.

Release dates are far apart. The E-2236 launched on 2019-05-28, while the D-1732TE launched on 2022-02-23, nearly three years later. Production status also differs, with the E-2236 marked as end-of-life and the D-1732TE as active. The part numbers are SRF7G for the E-2236 and SRLBW for the D-1732TE. Both have locked multipliers, and both target the server/workstation market segment.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the Intel Xeon D-1732TE is the stronger performer across every measured benchmark. It wins all six Cinebench tests, has a higher average benchmark score, and does so while consuming 28 watts less power. The E-2236, despite its much higher boost clock and lower launch MSRP, cannot match the D-1732TE in any recorded workload.

For users prioritizing raw performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, the D-1732TE is the clear choice. Its 8 cores, larger caches, triple-channel memory, and higher memory bandwidth give it structural advantages that the E-2236's clock speed cannot overcome. The consistency of the 2.2% lead across all tests indicates this is not a workload-specific quirk but a fundamental performance ceiling difference.

The E-2236 does have its own merits. It includes integrated graphics, which the D-1732TE lacks entirely, making it a more complete package for systems without a discrete GPU. It also has a lower launch MSRP of $284 versus $730, though the pricing question is not the focus here. The E-2236 is end-of-life, however, which may limit its availability for new designs. The D-1732TE remains in active production, ensuring long-term supply for deployments.

The verdict is straightforward: the D-1732TE wins on performance and efficiency. The E-2236 wins on integrated graphics and lower upfront cost, but it loses every benchmark comparison in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The D-1732TE wins in every benchmark category recorded. It takes multi-core tests across R15, R20, and R23, with leads of 2.1% to 2.2%. It also takes single-core tests, with leads of 2.2% to 2.3%. This means the D-1732TE is the better choice for workloads that scale with core count, such as compilation, rendering, or virtualization, and also for workloads that rely on single-thread performance, such as legacy applications or lightly threaded simulation software. Its 64.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and triple-channel configuration further favor data-heavy tasks like database processing or in-memory analytics.

The E-2236 has no benchmark wins, but it holds advantages outside the performance metrics. Its integrated UHD Graphics P630 provides display output capability, making it suitable for systems that need a standalone CPU with GPU output. Its Socket 1151 platform is a standard socketed design, which may offer more flexible motherboard selection or upgrade paths compared to the soldered BGA 2227 package of the D-1732TE. The E-2236 also has a higher boost clock, which, while not translating into wins in the recorded Cinebench tests, could still benefit extremely short, bursty workloads that are not represented in these benchmarks.

The production status also creates a practical split. The D-1732TE, being active, is the safer choice for new deployments requiring ongoing availability. The E-2236, being end-of-life, is only suitable for legacy systems or projects with existing inventory. In summary, the D-1732TE wins everywhere performance is measured, while the E-2236 wins only in feature areas like integrated graphics and platform socket flexibility.