Intel Xeon D-1567 vs Intel Xeon E-2324G Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2324G and the Intel Xeon D-1567 represent two distinct approaches to server processing. The E-2324G is a modern, high-frequency 4-core part built on Rocket Lake, while the D-1567 is a dense, 12-core Broadwell-DE system-on-chip. The benchmark data reveals a surprisingly consistent outcome across all recorded tests, with the older, higher-core-count D-1567 taking every single head-to-head win, albeit by a narrow margin.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Xeon D-1567 across all six Cinebench tests, both multi-core and single-core. This is a notable result, as the E-2324G’s much higher boost clock (4.60 GHz versus 2.70 GHz) does not translate into any single-core victory. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the D-1567 scores 965 against the E-2324G’s 886, a delta of -8.2% from the perspective of the E-2324G. The single-core R15 test tells a similar story: the D-1567 wins with 136 points over 125, again an 8.1% deficit for the E-2324G.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The D-1567 posts 4022 in multi-core versus 3694 for the E-2324G, an 8.2% gap. In single-core R20, the D-1567 scores 567 against 521, an 8.1% difference. The most recent test suite, Cinebench R23, confirms the trend: the D-1567 achieves 9578 in multi-core and 1352 in single-core, while the E-2324G manages 8797 and 1242 respectively. The delta percentages remain consistent at -8.2% and -8.1%. The data indicates a uniform performance advantage for the D-1567 in every recorded benchmark, with the margin hovering around 8% regardless of workload type.

It is important to contextualize these scores within the broader database. The E-2324G’s average benchmark score is 2823, placing it in the 51st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U (average score 2829, delta -0.2%), the Intel Atom x7211RE (2811, delta 0.4%), the Intel Core i5-10600 (2837, delta -0.5%), and the Intel Core i7-6800K (2838, delta -0.5%). The D-1567’s average benchmark score is 2770, also in the 51st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE (2767, delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G (2774, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i7-5930K (2775, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U (2765, delta 0.2%). Both processors sit in the same performance percentile, but the D-1567 edges ahead in the direct comparison.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the head-to-head benchmark data, the Intel Xeon D-1567 wins in every category. It is faster in both single-threaded and multi-threaded Cinebench workloads across all three major versions (R15, R20, R23). The 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides a raw multi-threading advantage that the E-2324G cannot overcome, despite the E-2324G’s higher clock speeds. For applications that rely heavily on Cinebench-style rendering performance, the D-1567 is the clear choice.

However, the E-2324G has its own domain of superiority that is not captured by the Cinebench suite. It features integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics P750, while the D-1567 has no integrated graphics. This makes the E-2324G the only option for systems that require a display output without a discrete GPU. Furthermore, the E-2324G supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, whereas the D-1567 is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with 24 lanes. For workloads that benefit from the newer PCIe standard, such as certain NVMe storage arrays or high-bandwidth accelerators, the E-2324G’s platform offers a modern connectivity advantage.

The E-2324G also has a significantly higher boost clock (4.60 GHz versus 2.70 GHz), which, while not yielding a win in the recorded Cinebench tests, suggests potential advantages in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks that are not represented in this dataset. The data shows the D-1567 winning all recorded tests, but the E-2324G’s feature set points to use cases involving integrated graphics and PCIe Gen 4 peripherals.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras. The E-2324G is built on Rocket Lake, specifically the Rocket Lake-E variant, using a 14 nm process node. Its die size is 276 mm². The D-1567 is based on Broadwell, the Broadwell-DE variant, also on a 14 nm process node, with a die size of 246 mm² and a transistor count of 3,200 million. The core counts differ dramatically: the E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The E-2324G has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and an 8 MB shared L3 cache. The D-1567 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a 1.5 MB L3 cache per core. The latter’s per-core L3 allocation is smaller, but the aggregate L3 cache across 12 cores totals more than the E-2324G’s shared pool. Memory support differs as well: the E-2324G supports only DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the D-1567 supports both DDR3 and DDR4 in dual-channel mode, though no bandwidth figure is recorded for it.

Both processors support ECC memory, an essential feature for server reliability. The socket types are incompatible: the E-2324G uses Intel Socket 1200, while the D-1567 uses Intel BGA 1667, meaning they are not interchangeable on the same motherboard. The integrated graphics situation is a major differentiator, as the E-2324G includes UHD Graphics P750 and the D-1567 has none. PCIe support also differs, with the E-2324G offering Gen 4 (20 lanes) and the D-1567 offering Gen 3 (24 lanes). Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently listed as active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1567 scores 9578 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G scores 8797. The D-1567 leads by 8.2%.

Q: Does the E-2324G ever win a head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the D-1567 winning all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with the E-2324G trailing by margins between 8.1% and 8.2% in every case.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads. The D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Intel Xeon E-2324G has integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics P750. The Intel Xeon D-1567 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The E-2324G supports only DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration. The D-1567 supports both DDR3 and DDR4 in dual-channel mode.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The E-2324G has an average benchmark score of 2823, while the D-1567 has an average of 2770. Both sit in the 51st percentile of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

The following table summarizes the key differences in specifications between the two processors, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2324G | Intel Xeon D-1567 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 4 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.10 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel BGA 1667 |

| Architecture | Rocket Lake | Broadwell |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 276 mm² | 246 mm² |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 3,200 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 3, 24 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 | None |

| Launch MSRP | $209 | 1199 |

| Release Date | 2021-09-07 | 2016-02-23 |

| Part Number | SRKN7 | SR2M3 |