CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon D-1567 and Intel Xeon E-2176M are both server-class processors, but the benchmark data reveals a clear and consistent performance hierarchy. Across every Cinebench test recorded, the Xeon D-1567 holds a decisive lead, despite the E-2176M's higher clock speeds. The D-1567 wins all six head-to-head comparisons, with margins ranging from 4.8% to 5.4%. This outcome is driven by the D-1567's 12 cores and 24 threads, which outnumber the E-2176M's 6 cores and 12 threads. While the E-2176M offers a faster boost clock of 4.40 GHz compared to 2.70 GHz, raw core count proves more impactful in these multi-threaded workloads. The average benchmark scores reinforce this: the D-1567 averages 2770, while the E-2176M averages 2751, a difference of only 0.7% in overall performance. This narrow gap in averages, contrasted with the consistent 4.8% wins in Cinebench, highlights how the D-1567's advantage is concentrated in specific, heavily threaded tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Xeon D-1567 does not just win; it wins uniformly. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the D-1567 scores 965 against the E-2176M's 921, a 4.8% advantage. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the D-1567 scores 4022 versus 3838, again a 4.8% lead. The largest margin comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the D-1567 scores 136 against 129, a 5.4% advantage. This result is particularly notable because single-core performance typically favors higher clock speeds, yet the older Broadwell architecture still outperforms the Coffee Lake part.

The trend continues in newer benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the D-1567 scores 9578, while the E-2176M scores 9140, maintaining the exact 4.8% delta. Similarly, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the D-1567 scores 1352 versus 1290, another 4.8% margin. The consistency of this 4.8% delta across three different Cinebench versions (R15, R20, R23) suggests a fundamental architectural or configuration advantage, not a benchmark-specific anomaly. The only test in the pack where the E-2176M has additional data is Geekbench, where it scores 4787 multi-core and 1362 single-core. However, no corresponding Geekbench score exists for the D-1567, so no direct comparison can be made. The absence of this data means the overall wins count stands at 6 for the D-1567 and 0 for the E-2176M.

Examining the percentile ranks provides context. The D-1567 sits at the 51st percentile of all CPUs, while the E-2176M sits at the 50th percentile. This near-identical percentile placement shows that while the D-1567 wins every head-to-head test, its overall standing among all processors is only marginally better. The average benchmark score of 2770 for the D-1567 places it just 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE and 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U. The E-2176M, with an average of 2751, sits 0.4% above the AMD EPYC 7261 and 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U. These rival comparisons suggest both chips occupy a similar performance tier in the broader market, even though they diverge in this specific matchup.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Xeon D-1567 is the superior performer in this comparison. It wins every single benchmark where both chips have scores, and it does so by a consistent margin of roughly 5%. For anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput in Cinebench-style workloads, the D-1567 is the clear choice. Its 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides a tangible advantage over the 6-core, 12-thread E-2176M, and this advantage manifests in both multi-core and single-core tests. The E-2176M's higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz and lower TDP of 45 watts cannot overcome the core deficit.

However, the verdict is not a complete dismissal of the E-2176M. Its 45-watt TDP, compared to the D-1567's 65-watt TDP, indicates higher power efficiency. This makes the E-2176M a more suitable option for thermally constrained or power-sensitive environments. The E-2176M also features integrated UHD Graphics P630, which the D-1567 lacks entirely. If a system requires a discrete GPU, this integration is irrelevant, but for basic display output or hardware acceleration, it is a significant advantage. The E-2176M is also a newer design, released in 2018 versus 2016, and its Coffee Lake architecture supports a 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, a figure not listed for the D-1567. Ultimately, the D-1567 wins on performance, while the E-2176M wins on efficiency and integrated features. The choice depends on whether raw compute or power economy is the primary requirement.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2176M has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the D-1567 scores 9578 compared to the E-2176M's 9140, a 4.8% advantage. The same 4.8% delta appears in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests.

Q: Does the E-2176M win in any benchmark?

A: No. According to the head-to-head data, the D-1567 wins all 6 benchmark comparisons. The E-2176M has a Geekbench score, but no comparable Geekbench result exists for the D-1567.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2176M has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which is substantially higher than the D-1567's 2.70 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon D-1567 and the Intel Xeon E-2176M support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The E-2176M has a TDP of 45 watts, while the D-1567 has a TDP of 65 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The D-1567 has double the cores (12 vs 6) and double the threads (24 vs 12). Its base clock is lower at 2.10 GHz versus 2.70 GHz for the E-2176M, and its boost clock is significantly lower at 2.70 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The D-1567 uses the Intel BGA 1667 socket, while the E-2176M uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket. The D-1567 supports both DDR3 and DDR4 memory, whereas the E-2176M supports only DDR4. The E-2176M lists a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, a figure not provided for the D-1567. The D-1567 offers 24 PCIe lanes (Gen 3), while the E-2176M offers 16 PCIe lanes (Gen 3). The D-1567 does not include integrated graphics, but the E-2176M includes UHD Graphics P630. The D-1567 has a launch MSRP of 1199, while the E-2176M has a launch MSRP of $450. The D-1567 has a larger die size of 246 mm² compared to 154 mm² for the E-2176M, and the D-1567's transistor count is listed at 3,200 million, while the E-2176M's is not listed.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is clear. The D-1567 is built on the Broadwell architecture, specifically the Broadwell-DE generation, while the E-2176M uses the Coffee Lake architecture, part of the Coffee Lake-H generation. Both are manufactured on a 14 nm process node by Intel. The D-1567 has a per-core cache configuration: 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, plus 1.5 MB L3 per core. The E-2176M also has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, but its L3 cache is 12 MB shared across all cores. The D-1567's cache structure is per-core, while the E-2176M uses a shared pool. The D-1567 does not have a listed integrated graphics processor, whereas the E-2176M integrates UHD Graphics P630. The D-1567 is listed as a server/workstation part with an active production status, while the E-2176M is also a server/workstation part but is marked as end-of-life. The D-1567 was released in 2016, and the E-2176M was released in 2018. The D-1567's part number is SR2M3, and the E-2176M's part number is SR3YX. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-1567 wins in all performance-centric scenarios. Its 12-core, 24-thread configuration delivers a consistent 4.8% to 5.4% advantage across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, covering both multi-core and single-core tests. This makes it the preferable option for heavily multithreaded applications such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and server-side virtualization, where the additional cores can be fully utilized. The data also shows it wins in single-core performance, so even lightly threaded tasks see a slight edge. Its larger die size and higher transistor count suggest a more complex silicon design, capable of sustaining higher throughput.

The Intel Xeon E-2176M wins in efficiency and integration. Its 45-watt TDP is 20 watts lower than the D-1567's 65-watt TDP, making it better suited for compact, power-sensitive workstations or mobile platforms where heat dissipation is a concern. The inclusion of UHD Graphics P630 means it can output video without a discrete GPU, which is a decisive advantage in systems where a dedicated graphics card is not needed. Its higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz provides burst performance that could benefit short, latency-sensitive tasks, although the benchmark data does not show this translating into a win. The E-2176M also carries a lower launch MSRP of $450 compared to the D-1567's 1199, though pricing considerations are noted here only as a factual specification difference. For users who prioritize power efficiency, integrated graphics, and lower thermal output, the E-2176M is the appropriate choice. For users who prioritize raw compute performance across all measured benchmarks, the D-1567 is the definitive winner.