CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9474F

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6960P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 72 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 432 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 500W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,748

11,194

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,234

N/A

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

36,451

46,645

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,145

N/A

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

86,790

111,060

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

12,252

N/A

passmark_data_compression

N/A

2,797,724

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

162,013

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

193,404

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

1,484

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

527,473

passmark_integer_math

N/A

727,750

passmark_multithread

N/A

130,659

passmark_physics

N/A

24,937

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

371,795

passmark_single_thread

N/A

3,287

passmark_singlethread

N/A

3,287

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon 6960P

Reviewing the test data for the AMD EPYC 9474F chip from AMD and the 6960P chip from Intel, the trend of similar throughput emerges. Neither CPU dominates steadily throughout most scenarios. This trading of victories means underlying balance. Those encounter a genuine selection here. Each CPUs deliver solid capability.

None of the CPU maintains a decisive lead in this matchup. the AMD EPYC 9474F chip from AMD wins marginally in certain tests, while the 6960P chip from Intel claims different ones. This trading dynamic implies core parity between them. Any gaps are marginal and possibly invisible in real-world applications. Either offer strong results.

Gaming performance similarly show competitive performance between the AMD EPYC 9474F chip from AMD and the 6960P chip from Intel. Performance gaps usually land below 5-10%. The slight variations are rarely detectable during everyday gaming. Each CPUs achieve responsive results. Those who game might select safely between both chips.

For people conflicted between the AMD EPYC 9474F chip from AMD and the 6960P chip from Intel, remain comfortable that either pick delivers comparable capability. The performance figures supports no clear winner. Reach your selection on other considerations and experience strong capability either way. Each are champions in their particular regard. Choose comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9474F

6960P

Core Specs

Cores

72 +50.0%

Threads

144 +50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.7 -25.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.9 -4.9%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.7 -25.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.9 -4.9%

Multiplier

27 -25.0%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

432 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

500 +38.9%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-AP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

3x 598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

614.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 7529

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

6 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$6780

$9625

Part Number

100-100000788

SRPKX

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

102°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9474F Details View Xeon 6960P Details