CPU Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6737P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 144 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 270W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,563
6,822
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
220
963
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
6,515
28,428
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
919
4,013
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
15,514
67,688
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,190
N/A
passmark_data_compression
217,805
1,157,255
passmark_data_encryption
12,187
65,615
passmark_extended_instructions
13,370
105,453
passmark_find_prime_numbers
53
697
passmark_floating_point_math
45,057
258,811
passmark_integer_math
61,503
330,756
passmark_multithread
18,252
79,634
passmark_physics
1,040
9,362
passmark_random_string_sorting
23,451
129,510
passmark_single_thread
3,539
3,048
passmark_singlethread
3,539
3,048

Analysis: Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Xeon 6737P

Reviewing the test figures for Intel Core 5 210H and 6737P, the trend of matched processing appears. Neither option dominates repeatedly throughout all workloads. The alternating of victories indicates core balance. Consumers encounter a real decision here. Either processors provide capable throughput.

Based on a hardware perspective, Intel Core 5 210H and 6737P possess comparable capabilities. Thread arrangements, clock rates, and cache hierarchy sizes are closely equivalent. The spec parity supports the comparable test figures. None of the holds a notable hardware superiority. This matchup is even.

Gaming benchmarks similarly demonstrate close performance between Intel Core 5 210H and 6737P. Frame rates differences typically remain under testing variance. The marginal gaps are barely perceptible during everyday gameplay. Each CPUs achieve smooth gaming. Gaming enthusiasts might select comfortably between them.

For people uncertain between Intel Core 5 210H and 6737P, feel confident that each pick provides matching capability. This test numbers supports not a definite victor. Form your decision on other factors and experience excellent performance no matter what. Each are winners in their own sense. Pick comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 210H
6737P
Core Specs
Cores
8
32 +300.0%
Threads
12
64 +433.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.2
2.9 +31.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
4 -16.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2.2
2.9 +31.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
4 -16.7%
Multiplier
22
29 +31.8%
SMP CPUs
1
2 +100.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
144 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
270 +500.0%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Granite Rapids
Codename
Raptor Lake-H
Granite Rapids
Generation
Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
10 nm
5 nm
Die Size
598 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 1744
Intel Socket 4710
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$342
$4995
Part Number
SRQ6RQ5MN
SRVNZ
Package
FC-BGA16F
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
100°C
102°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Core 5 210H Details View Xeon 6737P Details