CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 90W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6737P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 270W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,761

6,822

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

248

963

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

7,338

28,428

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,035

4,013

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,472

67,688

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,466

N/A

passmark_data_compression

232,242

1,157,255

passmark_data_encryption

15,809

65,615

passmark_extended_instructions

14,251

105,453

passmark_find_prime_numbers

109

697

passmark_floating_point_math

34,757

258,811

passmark_integer_math

62,128

330,756

passmark_multithread

20,556

79,634

passmark_physics

1,905

9,362

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,613

129,510

passmark_single_thread

2,371

3,048

passmark_singlethread

2,371

3,048

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Xeon 6737P

Reviewing the test data for AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD and 6737P (Intel), the pattern of similar capability appears. No chip excels repeatedly throughout the scenarios. The trading of wins suggests fundamental balance. Consumers confront a real selection here. Both options deliver capable capability.

Not one chip possesses a decisive advantage in this comparison. AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD leads marginally in specific scenarios, while 6737P (Intel) takes different ones. The swapping pattern indicates underlying balance between both chips. Any differences are minor and possibly unnoticeable in everyday tasks. Both offer excellent capability.

From a specification standpoint, AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD and 6737P (Intel) have comparable capabilities. Thread configurations, frequency speeds, and L3 sizes are nearly comparable. The technical equality justifies the close performance data. None of the has a significant hardware edge. The playing field is fair.

Overall, this comparison between AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD and 6737P (Intel) concludes in a effective tie. Speed differences are small and unlikely to influence real-world experience. Center your decision on price, motherboard preferences, and individual feature priorities. Either are excellent choices. This parity is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 8024P

6737P

Core Specs

Cores

32 +300.0%

Threads

64 +300.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.9 +20.8%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4 +33.3%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.9 +20.8%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4 +33.3%

Multiplier

29 +20.8%

SMP CPUs

2 +100.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

270 +200.0%

Configurable TDP

70-100 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4c

Granite Rapids

Codename

Siena

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

8,875 million

—

Die Size

73 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Six-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

230.4 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP6

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$409

$4995

Part Number

100-000001136

SRVNZ

Package

FC-LGA4844

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

102°C

Bundled Cooler

None

View EPYC 8024P Details View Xeon 6737P Details