CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9124

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6736P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 36 Cores / 72 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

3,756

4,290

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

530

605

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

15,652

17,875

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

2,209

2,523

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

37,269

42,561

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

5,261

6,008

passmark_data_compression

599,417

796,658

passmark_data_encryption

36,078

46,236

passmark_extended_instructions

43,380

55,563

passmark_find_prime_numbers

256

392

passmark_floating_point_math

87,057

149,770

passmark_integer_math

148,785

206,833

passmark_multithread

43,846

50,072

passmark_physics

3,662

6,531

passmark_random_string_sorting

74,177

103,723

passmark_single_thread

2,719

2,024

passmark_singlethread

2,719

2,024

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9124 vs Intel Xeon 6736P

Analyzing the test data for AMD EPYC 9124 (AMD) and Xeon 6736P, the pattern of similar processing appears. Neither processor excels reliably over every benchmarks. The trading of victories means inherent equality. Users have a true choice between them. Both options provide competent throughput.

No processor holds a overwhelming advantage between them. AMD EPYC 9124 (AMD) leads marginally in particular scenarios, while Xeon 6736P wins different ones. The back-and-forth pattern implies core equivalence between these two. Any differences are minor and likely imperceptible in everyday applications. The two achieve excellent throughput.

Based on a engineering viewpoint, AMD EPYC 9124 (AMD) and Xeon 6736P share matching hardware. Thread counts, frequency clocks, and cache configurations are closely comparable. This hardware balance explains the similar score data. Neither maintains a substantial engineering advantage. This comparison is balanced.

In conclusion, this evaluation between AMD EPYC 9124 (AMD) and Xeon 6736P finishes in a practical stalemate. Speed gaps are minimal and unlikely to influence practical experience. Direct your choice on price, platform options, and particular feature preferences. Both are excellent options. This tie is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9124

6736P

Core Specs

Cores

36 +125.0%

Threads

72 +125.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2 -33.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.1 +10.8%

Frequency (GHz)

2 -33.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.1 +10.8%

Multiplier

20 -33.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

205 +2.5%

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

26,280 million

—

Die Size

4x 72 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$1083

$3351

Part Number

100-100000802

SRVNW

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

98°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9124 Details View Xeon 6736P Details