CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6724P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 72 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 210W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

627,185

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

34,332

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

54,101

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

372

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

135,404

passmark_integer_math

92,524

172,216

passmark_multithread

30,689

51,345

passmark_physics

2,893

5,004

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

68,477

passmark_single_thread

3,265

3,279

passmark_singlethread

3,265

3,279

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

4,399

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

620

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

18,330

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

2,587

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

43,643

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

6,161

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6724P

Reviewing the test data for AMD AMD EPYC 9015 processor and Intel 6724P CPU, a pattern of competitive capability develops. Not one processor wins consistently in all workloads. This alternating of victories indicates core parity. Buyers encounter a actual decision here. Either options provide capable results.

None of the CPU holds a definitive edge in this comparison. AMD AMD EPYC 9015 processor wins marginally in particular benchmarks, while Intel 6724P CPU secures other benchmarks. This back-and-forth behavior indicates fundamental equality between both chips. Any deltas are slight and potentially unnoticeable in everyday scenarios. The two deliver capable results.

No processor possesses a decisive edge here. AMD AMD EPYC 9015 processor edges narrowly in some workloads, while Intel 6724P CPU takes alternative tests. This trading behavior suggests underlying balance between them. Any variations are minor and probably unnoticeable in everyday scenarios. Both provide solid results.

All things considered, the comparison between AMD AMD EPYC 9015 processor and Intel 6724P CPU results in a effective stalemate. Performance deltas are small and doubtful to impact actual experience. Direct your determination on availability, chipset considerations, and particular extra requirements. Either are excellent choices. This tie is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6724P

Core Specs

Cores

16 +100.0%

Threads

32 +100.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

3.6 0.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.3 +4.9%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

3.6 0.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.3 +4.9%

Multiplier

36 0.0%

SMP CPUs

8 +300.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

72 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

210 +68.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

3 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$3622

Part Number

100-000001553

SRVUA

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

103°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6724P Details