CPU Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest
CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 205W
ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,506
5,292
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
212
747
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
6,278
22,053
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
886
3,113
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
14,948
52,508
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,110
7,413
passmark_data_compression
202,225
1,230,786
passmark_data_encryption
11,964
81,850
passmark_extended_instructions
12,463
59,625
passmark_find_prime_numbers
48
451
passmark_floating_point_math
42,108
219,926
passmark_integer_math
56,308
302,954
passmark_multithread
17,586
61,775
passmark_physics
928
5,000
passmark_random_string_sorting
23,223
151,491
passmark_single_thread
3,735
1,910
passmark_singlethread
3,735
1,910

Analysis: Intel Core 3 100HL vs Intel Xeon 6710E

If processing power is this close, the evaluation between Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor and 6710E by Intel becomes particularly multifaceted. These CPUs swap wins across diverse benchmarks. The overall assessment is one of remarkable balance. Neither appears as a clear champion. This choice rests on specific needs.

None of the processor possesses a overwhelming advantage between them. Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor leads marginally in certain scenarios, while 6710E by Intel wins other benchmarks. The alternating pattern indicates fundamental parity between them. Any gaps are minor and likely invisible in everyday applications. Either provide capable performance.

In the end, builders should choose based on platform preference over absolute scores only. Both Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor and 6710E by Intel achieve solid throughput for their given segments. This determination depends on particular preferences. Either choice is reasonable. You won't go amiss here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 100HL
6710E
Core Specs
Cores
8
64 +700.0%
Threads
12
64 +433.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.1
2.4 +14.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
3.2 -30.4%
Frequency (GHz)
2.1
2.4 +14.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
3.2 -30.4%
Multiplier
21
24 +14.3%
SMP CPUs
1
2 +100.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
4 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
96 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
205 +355.6%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Sierra Forest
Codename
Raptor Lake-PS
Sierra Forest
Generation
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)
Process Size
10 nm
5 nm
Die Size
578 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
358.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 16 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$2749
Part Number
unknown
SRPG2
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
100°C
106°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Core 3 100HL Details View Xeon 6710E Details