CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9554

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 3.75 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

9,319

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,315

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

38,831

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,481

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

92,457

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

13,052

7,413

passmark_data_compression

N/A

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

451

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

219,926

passmark_integer_math

N/A

302,954

passmark_multithread

N/A

61,775

passmark_physics

N/A

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

151,491

passmark_single_thread

N/A

1,910

passmark_singlethread

N/A

1,910

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9554 vs Intel Xeon 6710E

Reviewing the test data for AMD EPYC 9554 by AMD and 6710E by Intel, the picture of matched throughput develops. Neither option dominates reliably over every scenarios. This swapping of leads suggests underlying equivalence. Buyers confront a actual selection between them. Both CPUs offer competent capability.

No processor possesses a clear lead in this comparison. AMD EPYC 9554 by AMD beats marginally in some benchmarks, while 6710E by Intel wins different ones. This swapping pattern suggests inherent equivalence between the processors. The gaps are marginal and likely unnoticeable in actual applications. Both provide capable capability.

Considering a hardware angle, AMD EPYC 9554 by AMD and 6710E by Intel feature equivalent specifications. Execution configurations, boost speeds, and memory subsystem amounts are tightly equivalent. This hardware parity accounts for the matched score figures. Not one possesses a significant hardware superiority. The competition is even.

At the end of the day, buyers might select based on specific requirements instead of benchmark speed alone. Either AMD EPYC 9554 by AMD and 6710E by Intel provide excellent results for their intended segments. This determination comes down to particular priorities. Both choice is reasonable. Users can't go astray with these options.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9554

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

64 0.0%

Threads

128

64 -50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.1

2.4 -22.6%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.75

3.2 -14.7%

Frequency (GHz)

3.1

2.4 -22.6%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.75

3.2 -14.7%

Multiplier

24 -22.6%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

205 -43.1%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Sierra Forest

Codename

Genoa

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$9087

$2749

Part Number

100-100000790

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9554 Details View Xeon 6710E Details