CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9474F

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,748

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,234

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

36,451

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,145

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

86,790

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

12,252

7,413

passmark_data_compression

N/A

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

451

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

219,926

passmark_integer_math

N/A

302,954

passmark_multithread

N/A

61,775

passmark_physics

N/A

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

151,491

passmark_single_thread

N/A

1,910

passmark_singlethread

N/A

1,910

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon 6710E

If processing power is so comparable, this matchup between AMD EPYC 9474F from AMD and 6710E (Intel) turns more multifaceted. The two options alternate blows over various tests. This combined picture is one of surprising balance. Not one emerges as a definite victor. This choice hinges on individual preferences.

Instead of dwelling on small performance variations, prospective consumers might examine additional elements. Power efficiency, acoustics, motherboard prices, and extras frequently count more than slight processing gains. Such variables might sway the decision. Consider broadly. The broader picture plays a role.

Looking at a specification angle, AMD EPYC 9474F from AMD and 6710E (Intel) possess equivalent capabilities. Thread arrangements, boost rates, and cache amounts are nearly equivalent. The technical equality justifies the close benchmark data. No holds a considerable engineering lead. The playing field is even.

Ultimately: AMD EPYC 9474F from AMD and 6710E (Intel) are evenly matched. Neither deserves a definite nod over the other. Allow value and chipset factors guide your concluding selection. Either CPUs can meet you well. It's a safe situation.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9474F

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

64 +33.3%

Threads

64 -33.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Multiplier

24 -33.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

205 -43.1%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Sierra Forest

Codename

Genoa

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$6780

$2749

Part Number

100-100000788

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9474F Details View Xeon 6710E Details