CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

451

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

219,926

passmark_integer_math

92,524

302,954

passmark_multithread

30,689

61,775

passmark_physics

2,893

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

151,491

passmark_single_thread

3,265

1,910

passmark_singlethread

3,265

1,910

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

7,413

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6710E

If processing power is this comparable, this analysis between AMD EPYC 9015 (AMD) and the Intel 6710E becomes especially nuanced. The two chips alternate leads over different workloads. The combined outcome is one of notable equality. No stands as a definite champion. This determination relies on individual priorities.

Neither chip maintains a decisive advantage between them. AMD EPYC 9015 (AMD) beats marginally in some workloads, while the Intel 6710E takes others. This trading pattern demonstrates core parity between the processors. Any deltas are minor and likely unnoticeable in actual applications. Each achieve excellent capability.

From a hardware angle, AMD EPYC 9015 (AMD) and the Intel 6710E feature equivalent specifications. Core configurations, speed speeds, and memory subsystem sizes are closely equivalent. This hardware parity supports the similar test results. No has a notable engineering advantage. The competition is level.

When users uncertain between AMD EPYC 9015 (AMD) and the Intel 6710E, remain assured that each option provides matching capability. This score numbers confirms nil decisive victor. Base your decision on secondary elements and benefit from solid throughput no matter what. Each are winners in this particular way. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

64 +700.0%

Threads

64 +300.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Multiplier

24 -33.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

205 +64.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$2749

Part Number

100-000001553

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6710E Details