CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9124

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6520P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 210W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

3,756

5,392

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

530

761

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

15,652

22,467

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

2,209

3,171

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

37,269

53,495

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

5,261

7,552

passmark_data_compression

599,417

841,518

passmark_data_encryption

36,078

45,188

passmark_extended_instructions

43,380

64,557

passmark_find_prime_numbers

256

526

passmark_floating_point_math

87,057

162,862

passmark_integer_math

148,785

214,288

passmark_multithread

43,846

62,936

passmark_physics

3,662

7,209

passmark_random_string_sorting

74,177

95,736

passmark_single_thread

2,719

3,356

passmark_singlethread

2,719

3,356

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9124 vs Intel Xeon 6520P

If processing power is remarkably close, the evaluation between the AMD EPYC 9124 chip from AMD and 6520P (Intel) becomes especially complex. These processors exchange blows over different benchmarks. The overall picture is one of impressive equivalence. Neither emerges as a definite winner. This decision rests on personal requirements.

From a hardware viewpoint, the AMD EPYC 9124 chip from AMD and 6520P (Intel) share comparable hardware. Processing configurations, speed frequencies, and memory subsystem sizes are tightly aligned. The hardware equivalence supports the similar performance numbers. None of the possesses a significant hardware edge. This playing field is balanced.

Instead of dwelling on marginal performance deltas, prospective buyers should examine secondary variables. TDP, acoustics, ecosystem expenses, and capabilities usually matter greater than minor processing improvements. The elements can sway the choice. Consider completely. This complete picture is important.

In the end, builders should choose based on specific requirements rather than raw numbers alone. Both the AMD EPYC 9124 chip from AMD and 6520P (Intel) offer excellent results for the respective price points. The decision hinges on particular requirements. Each choice is valid. Users shouldn't go astray between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9124

6520P

Core Specs

Cores

24 +50.0%

Threads

48 +50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4 -20.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

4 +8.1%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4 -20.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

4 +8.1%

Multiplier

24 -20.0%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

210 +5.0%

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

26,280 million

—

Die Size

4x 72 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$1083

$1295

Part Number

100-100000802

SRVNQ

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

95°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9124 Details View Xeon 6520P Details