CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6520P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 210W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

841,518

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

45,188

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

64,557

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

526

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

162,862

passmark_integer_math

92,524

214,288

passmark_multithread

30,689

62,936

passmark_physics

2,893

7,209

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

95,736

passmark_single_thread

3,265

3,356

passmark_singlethread

3,265

3,356

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

5,392

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

761

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

22,467

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

3,171

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

53,495

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

7,552

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6520P

If processing power is this comparable, this comparison between 6520P (Intel) and AMD's AMD EPYC 9015 chip becomes particularly interesting. Both processors swap wins across various scenarios. This total outcome is one of surprising parity. None of the appears as a obvious winner. This decision hinges on individual preferences.

Not one option holds a decisive lead in this matchup. 6520P (Intel) edges slightly in particular benchmarks, while AMD's AMD EPYC 9015 chip takes others. This trading dynamic demonstrates underlying parity between the processors. Any variations are minor and potentially invisible in everyday scenarios. Each provide strong results.

Based on a engineering viewpoint, 6520P (Intel) and AMD's AMD EPYC 9015 chip share similar capabilities. Thread configurations, speed speeds, and memory subsystem capacities are nearly matched. This spec equivalence accounts for the close test results. No holds a substantial engineering superiority. The comparison is level.

At the end of the day: 6520P (Intel) and AMD's AMD EPYC 9015 chip are evenly competitive. Not one earns a definite endorsement over the competitor. Let availability and motherboard choices influence your concluding choice. The two options should serve you capably. This is a win-win scenario.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6520P

Core Specs

Cores

24 +200.0%

Threads

48 +200.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

4 -2.4%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.4 -33.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

4 -2.4%

Multiplier

24 -33.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

210 +68.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$1295

Part Number

100-000001553

SRVNQ

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

95°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6520P Details