CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9474F

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6517P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 72 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 190W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,748

4,268

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,234

602

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

36,451

17,787

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,145

2,511

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

86,790

42,352

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

12,252

5,979

passmark_data_compression

N/A

653,338

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

32,385

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

51,891

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

335

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

127,497

passmark_integer_math

N/A

162,671

passmark_multithread

N/A

49,786

passmark_physics

N/A

4,452

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

67,480

passmark_single_thread

N/A

3,311

passmark_singlethread

N/A

3,311

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon 6517P

When comparing Intel 6517P vs AMD AMD EPYC 9474F CPU, the benchmark delta becomes obviously evident. Featuring higher concurrent performance, Intel 6517P offers substantially quicker processing in demanding workloads. This processor design superiority converts directly into everyday benefits. Test numbers validates this assessment. Those wanting raw power will appreciate what Intel 6517P delivers to the matchup.

The score difference between Intel 6517P and AMD AMD EPYC 9474F CPU grows even more clear in concurrent tasks. Workloads like code compilation showcase Intel 6517P's superiority. The additional processing resources offer considerable headroom for demanding scenarios. This power results into quicker processing windows. Efficiency gains are measurable and substantial.

The bottom line: Intel 6517P secures this showdown convincingly. Users seeking speed would definitely select Intel 6517P over AMD AMD EPYC 9474F CPU. This performance data confirms this conclusion. The tasks will benefit from its superior performance. It's a definite choice in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9474F

6517P

Core Specs

Cores

16 -66.7%

Threads

32 -66.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

3.2 -11.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.2 +2.4%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

3.2 -11.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.2 +2.4%

Multiplier

32 -11.1%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

72 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

190 -47.2%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

3 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$6780

$1195

Part Number

100-100000788

SRVU4

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

103°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9474F Details View Xeon 6517P Details