CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6353P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,761
2,223
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
248
313
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,338
9,264
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,035
1,307
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,472
22,058
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,466
3,114
passmark_data_compression
232,242
285,581
passmark_data_encryption
15,809
15,228
passmark_extended_instructions
14,251
18,311
passmark_find_prime_numbers
109
127
passmark_floating_point_math
34,757
63,509
passmark_integer_math
62,128
86,836
passmark_multithread
20,556
25,951
passmark_physics
1,905
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,613
31,226
passmark_single_thread
2,371
4,226
passmark_singlethread
2,371
4,226

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Xeon 6353P

During this direct comparison, Xeon 6353P emerges as the undisputed winner. Its test data indicate notable margins in both multi-threaded benchmarks. Whether you're assembling a workstation build, Xeon 6353P gives superior capability in this segment. The CPU manages intensive workloads with grace. This is especially apparent in practical scenarios.

Considering the specifications, Xeon 6353P surpasses AMD AMD EPYC 8024P over most performance metrics. For content creation, the performance delta leads to faster performance. Users seeking high-end capability would consider Xeon 6353P as the more capable selection. The threaded throughput is especially impressive. Modern workloads more and more take advantage of several threads.

AMD AMD EPYC 8024P isn't dismissed completely, though its speed difference compared to Xeon 6353P is challenging to deny. In price-aware consumers, AMD AMD EPYC 8024P could yet represent an option provided the lesser cost accounts for the lower power. However, when raw performance, Xeon 6353P represents the obvious victor. The verdict is straightforward. Power enthusiasts would gravitate toward Xeon 6353P.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8024P
6353P
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.7 +12.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
5.4 +80.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.7 +12.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
5.4 +80.0%
Multiplier
24
27 +12.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
90
65 -27.8%
Configurable TDP
70-100 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Raptor Lake
Codename
Siena
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,875 million
Die Size
73 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
C262, C266
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$409
$426
Part Number
100-000001136
SRPLS
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 8024P Details View Xeon 6353P Details