Intel Pentium G4560T vs Intel Pentium G4600T Comparison

The Intel Pentium G4600T and G4560T are nearly identical Kaby Lake dual-core parts, but the data shows the G4600T holds a consistent, if modest, lead in every benchmark where they are compared directly. The G4600T wins all five head-to-head Cinebench tests by a margin of roughly 2% to 3%, making it the better choice for anyone prioritizing raw compute performance in this specific pairing. The G4560T, meanwhile, is the only one with a Geekbench score in the record, but it also carries a weaker integrated GPU. For a builder choosing between these two, the G4600T is the straightforward performance pick, while the G4560T is only relevant if you need its specific Geekbench-proven capability or prefer its lower base clock for some reason. The performance gap is real but small, so the decision ultimately comes down to whether the G4600T’s slight edge is worth it for your workload.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Pentium G4600T is the superior processor in this direct comparison. It wins all five head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 2.2% to 2.7% across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests. Its average benchmark score of 895 versus the G4560T’s 887 confirms the overall trend. If you are building a system using these two specific CPUs and want the best multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench numbers, the G4600T is the choice. Its higher 3.00 GHz base clock over the G4560T’s 2.90 GHz directly contributes to this advantage.

The G4560T is not without a reason to exist, but the evidence for it is thinner. It has a Geekbench multicore score of 1237 and a single-core score of 594, which are not present for the G4600T. If your application relies on Geekbench as a primary metric and you need that specific data point, the G4560T is the only one of the two that provides it. However, in every shared test, it loses. Its integrated graphics are the weaker Intel HD 610 versus the G4600T’s Intel HD 630, which is a tangible disadvantage for builds relying on the iGPU. Both CPUs sit at the 24th percentile of all CPUs, showing they are entry-level parts. The G4560T’s rival list includes the Intel Core i7-860 (within 0.1% in average score), while the G4600T is matched exactly by the Intel Core i5-5300U and AMD PRO A10-8770E. For a practical builder, the verdict is simple: take the G4600T unless the G4560T’s Geekbench results or its specific part number (SR35T) are essential to your project.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Pentium G4600T has an average benchmark score of 895, which is higher than the G4560T’s 887. This places the G4600T ahead by a small but measurable margin.

Q: Are the two CPUs in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the G4600T and the G4560T are listed at the 24th percentile against all CPUs. This means they are considered entry-level performers relative to the broader market.

Q: What is the difference in their base clock speeds?

A: The G4600T has a base clock of 3.00 GHz, while the G4560T runs at 2.90 GHz. The G4600T’s 100 MHz advantage is the primary driver of its benchmark wins.

Q: Which processor has better integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Pentium G4600T features the Intel HD 630 integrated graphics, whereas the G4560T comes with the Intel HD 610. The HD 630 is the more capable iGPU of the two.

Q: How much faster is the G4600T in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The G4600T scores 2602, while the G4560T scores 2544. This gives the G4600T a 2.3% advantage in that specific benchmark.

Q: Do both CPUs support the same memory configuration?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. They also both lack ECC memory support.

Architecture Differences

Both the Intel Pentium G4600T and G4560T are built on the same fundamental architecture. They share the Kaby Lake codename and architecture, are manufactured on Intel’s 14 nm process node, and use the same Intel Socket 1151. Both parts have 2 cores and 4 threads, with identical cache layouts: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 3 MB L3 cache. They also share the same PCIe configuration of Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. There are no differences in the core architecture, instruction set, or memory controller design between the two, as they are both Kaby Lake Pentium parts.

The key architectural difference that appears in the data is the integrated graphics processor. The G4600T is equipped with the Intel HD 630, while the G4560T uses the Intel HD 610. This is a meaningful distinction for users who plan to use the CPU’s integrated graphics without a discrete GPU. The HD 630 is the higher-tier iGPU, typically offering better performance for video playback and light gaming. Another difference is the part number, with the G4600T being SR35R and the G4560T being SR35T, indicating a different silicon bin. The production status for both is listed as "Active," and they were released on the same date. The architecture is otherwise identical, meaning the performance gap comes down to clock speed and iGPU tier, not design changes.

Specification Differences

The two processors are nearly identical on paper, with only a few fields showing a direct difference. The most significant specification difference is the base clock: the G4600T runs at 3.00 GHz, while the G4560T runs at 2.90 GHz. Neither CPU has a boost clock, so these are fixed operating frequencies. The integrated graphics differ, with the G4600T featuring the Intel HD 630 and the G4560T featuring the Intel HD 610. The part numbers also differ (SR35R vs. SR35T), confirming they are distinct SKUs. All other core specifications match exactly: 2 cores, 4 threads, 35W TDP, dual-channel DDR4 support with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, no ECC memory, and the same 14 nm Kaby Lake architecture.

The benchmark suite also shows a difference in available data. The G4600T has results only for Cinebench tests, while the G4560T has those same Cinebench tests plus Geekbench multicore and single-core scores. This is not a hardware difference but a data collection difference, yet it means the G4560T has a broader benchmark profile in this database. For the shared tests, the G4600T consistently scores higher. The cache configuration is identical, with the same L1, L2, and L3 sizes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either. The memory bus, PCIe lanes, and socket are all the same, making the choice between them purely about clock speed and iGPU capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is unambiguous: the Intel Pentium G4600T wins every single shared benchmark. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the G4600T scores 262 against the G4560T’s 256, a 2.3% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20 multi-core, the G4600T scores 1092 versus 1068, a 2.2% lead. The single-core tests show a similar pattern: in Cinebench R20 single-core, the G4600T posts 154 against 150, a 2.7% margin, which is the largest percentage win for the G4600T. In the more demanding Cinebench R23 tests, the G4600T scores 2602 in multi-core versus 2544 for the G4560T (2.3% ahead), and 367 in single-core versus 359 (2.2% ahead). Across all five tests, the G4600T’s win margin is remarkably consistent, hovering between 2.2% and 2.7%.

The G4560T’s only benchmark wins are the two Geekbench tests for which the G4600T has no recorded score. The G4560T scores 1237 in Geekbench multi-core and 594 in Geekbench single-core. Without a comparable G4600T score, these results stand alone. Looking at the average scores, the G4600T’s 895 average is 8 points higher than the G4560T’s 887, a difference of less than 1%. This small average delta is consistent with the narrow margins in the Cinebench tests. The rival lists for each CPU also show their positioning: the G4600T is exactly tied with the Intel Core i5-5300U and AMD PRO A10-8770E, while the G4560T is nearly tied with the Intel Xeon X5550 and Intel Core i7-860. The Intel Core i3-6100 appears in both rival lists, with the G4600T being 0.7% ahead of it and the G4560T being 0.2% behind it, highlighting the tiny performance spread between these entry-level parts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Pentium G4600T wins in every workload covered by the shared benchmarks. It is the faster CPU for multi-threaded rendering tasks, as shown by its higher Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core scores. It also wins in single-threaded performance, with higher scores in the Cinebench R20 and R23 single-core tests. This makes it the better choice for applications that rely on CPU rendering, video encoding, or any workload that benefits from a higher fixed clock speed. The 3.00 GHz base clock gives it an edge over the G4560T’s 2.90 GHz in all compute tasks. Additionally, the G4600T’s Intel HD 630 integrated graphics are a clear win for systems without a discrete GPU, offering better graphical capability than the G4560T’s Intel HD 610. For a pure performance comparison, the G4600T is the winner in all five head-to-head tests.

The Intel Pentium G4560T wins only in the sense of having Geekbench benchmark data. If your analysis or software selection relies specifically on Geekbench scores, the G4560T provides those numbers (1237 multi-core, 594 single-core), while the G4600T has none recorded. This could be a deciding factor for a niche use case where Geekbench is the standard metric. The G4560T also has a slightly lower base clock, which might theoretically reduce power consumption, but both CPUs have the same 35W TDP, so there is no power advantage in the data. In practice, the G4560T’s wins are limited to data availability, not performance. For any builder comparing these two directly, the G4600T is the superior part for all compute and graphics workloads, while the G4560T is only relevant if you specifically need its Geekbench-verified capabilities or prefer the SR35T part number.