AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data separates these two processors into distinct usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, meaning all measured performance data belongs exclusively to the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus. That gives the Intel part every recorded win by default, but the more useful analysis lies in what the Intel scores reveal about its strengths and where the AMD part would likely compete based on its specifications.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39684 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 21198 place it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs in the database. These numbers indicate sustained heavy lifting across all 24 cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 59439 reinforces this, showing the processor handles parallel workloads with substantial headroom.

Single-thread performance on the Intel part is comparatively modest. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2356 and PassMark single-thread score of 4951 are respectable but do not reach the same percentile dominance as its multi-core results. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz helps, but the architecture prioritizes core count over raw single-core speed.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D, with 8 cores and 16 threads, targets a different workload profile. Its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, enabled by 3D V-Cache technology, is designed for cache-sensitive applications. The database shows no benchmark scores for this part, so direct numerical comparison is impossible. However, the specification gap suggests the AMD part would excel in gaming and latency-sensitive tasks where large cache reduces memory access penalties, while the Intel part dominates throughput-oriented workloads.

The Intel processor also shows strength in data compression and encryption. Its PassMark data compression score of 658724 and data encryption score of 50008 indicate efficient handling of these specialized tasks. The extended instructions score of 51290 and floating point math score of 201773 further demonstrate broad computational capability across different instruction types.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database contains zero benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel part scores 79574 on average, placing it 0.3% above the Intel Core i9-14900KF (79371), 0.6% above the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097), 0.6% below the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041), and 1.4% below the Intel Xeon w5-2565X (80671).

Q: What is the core and thread configuration difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part has no hyperthreading, matching its thread count to its core count.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D boosts to 4.50 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz compared to the Intel's 2.70 GHz.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a TDP of 120 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus has a TDP of 55 watts. The Intel part draws less thermal headroom despite having three times the core count.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus uses a 3 nm process node, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses a 5 nm process node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no benchmark scores in the database, a direct head-to-head numerical comparison is not possible. The recorded data shows the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus achieving a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79574. This places it in a competitive band with high-end desktop processors.

The Intel part's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. It sits 0.3% above the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which is a flagship desktop processor. The margin is narrow, indicating the 290HX Plus delivers comparable throughput to established high-end desktop parts. Against the AMD EPYC 7413, a server-class processor, the Intel part trails by 0.6%, a negligible difference that suggests its multi-threaded performance approaches enterprise levels.

Examining the individual Cinebench scores, the multi-core R23 result of 39684 demonstrates that the 24 cores scale effectively under sustained load. The single-core R23 score of 2356, while lower in percentile ranking, still enables responsive daily use. The PassMark integer math score of 164839 and floating point math score of 201773 show balanced arithmetic capability across both integer and floating point operations.

The find prime numbers score of 519 and random string sorting score of 80327 represent more specialized workloads. The prime number test, which is heavily dependent on single-thread efficiency and cache behavior, yields a relatively low score compared to other PassMark metrics. This suggests the Intel architecture, with its 36 MB of shared L3 cache, does not optimize for this particular workload as effectively as it does for parallel throughput tasks.

The physics score of 3387 and multithread score of 59439 complete the PassMark picture. The multithread score, in particular, confirms the processor's strength in heavily parallel applications such as video rendering, scientific simulation, and compilation workloads. The data compression score of 658724 stands out as the highest raw number in the benchmark set, indicating exceptional performance in archiving and data transfer tasks.

Specification Differences

The core configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses 8 cores with 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus uses 24 cores with 24 threads. The Intel part sacrifices simultaneous multithreading for raw core count, while the AMD part relies on hyperthreading to reach 16 threads from 8 physical cores.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The AMD base clock of 4.00 GHz is substantially higher than the Intel base clock of 2.70 GHz. However, the Intel boost clock of 5.50 GHz exceeds the AMD boost clock of 4.50 GHz by a full gigahertz. This creates an interesting dynamic where the AMD part starts at a higher frequency but cannot reach the same peak.

Thermal design power favors the Intel part. The AMD TDP of 120 watts is more than double the Intel TDP of 55 watts. This makes the Intel processor more suitable for thermally constrained environments, despite its higher core count.

Memory bandwidth differs as well. The Intel part supports 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the AMD part supports 83.2 GB/s. Both use DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel part's higher bandwidth gives it an advantage in memory-intensive workloads.

PCIe lane allocation also varies. The AMD processor provides 24 CPU-connected Gen 5 lanes, while the Intel processor provides 20 Gen 5 lanes. Both support PCIe Gen 5, but the AMD part offers more direct CPU lanes for expansion devices.

The integrated graphics differ in capability. The AMD part includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The Intel solution likely provides better integrated graphics performance given its dedicated Arc architecture, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The AMD processor uses a 5 nm process node with 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel processor uses a 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The Intel die is significantly larger and packs more transistors, consistent with its higher core count.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D is built on the Raphael architecture, part of the Zen 4 generation. It uses the AM5 socket and is classified as a desktop processor. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache is the architectural centerpiece, enabled by 3D V-Cache technology that stacks additional cache die vertically. This large cache is intended to reduce memory latency in gaming and other cache-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus uses the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It uses the BGA 2114 socket and is classified as a mobile processor. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is considerably smaller than the AMD part, but the architecture compensates with higher memory bandwidth and more cores.

The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. Per-core cache allocations favor the Intel architecture, though the AMD part's massive L3 cache creates a different trade-off.

Both processors support ECC memory and have unlocked multipliers, though the AMD part's multiplier is listed as locked while the Intel part is listed as unlocked. The AMD part's production status is active, as is the Intel part's. The AMD release date of 2026-05-30 follows the Intel release date of 2026-03-16.

The AMD processor has a launch MSRP of $329, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel part. The AMD part is part of the 7000 series, while the Intel part is part of Core Ultra Series 2. Both are currently in production.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the asymmetry in available data requires careful interpretation. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus has a recorded average benchmark score of 79574 and sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i9-14900KF and Intel Core i9-14900K, are within 0.6% of its score, confirming it performs at flagship desktop levels despite being a mobile part.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no recorded benchmark scores, which means its performance cannot be quantified from the database. Its specifications suggest a different use case: 8 cores and 16 threads with a massive 96 MB L3 cache point toward gaming and latency-sensitive applications. The 120 watt TDP and desktop socket indicate it is designed for stationary systems with adequate cooling.

For workloads that demand maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is the supported choice based on recorded data. Its 39684 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 59439 PassMark multithread score demonstrate exceptional parallel performance. The 55 watt TDP makes it unusually efficient for its core count.

For cache-sensitive workloads where the AMD part's 96 MB L3 cache would be the relevant differentiator, the database provides no numerical evidence. The AMD processor's higher base clock of 4.00 GHz could benefit lightly threaded tasks, but this cannot be verified against benchmark results.

The Intel part's 0.3% lead over the Intel Core i9-14900KF positions it as a top-tier performer. Its 0.6% deficit against the AMD EPYC 7413 shows it competes with server processors in certain metrics. These comparisons give concrete reference points despite the absence of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D data.

Users seeking a processor with verified high multi-core performance should consider the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus. Users prioritizing the AMD part's large cache and desktop form factor must rely on its specifications alone, as the database records no benchmark results for it.