Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the Intel Processor U301L occupy entirely different segments of the desktop and mobile markets. The benchmark data available in the database shows a complete absence of shared test results between the two processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a full suite of recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Intel Processor U301L has no benchmark entries at all.

Focusing on the recorded data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, the processor demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, the chip records a score of 44,253, while single-core performance reaches 2,439. The Cinebench R20 results show 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 6,656 multi-core and 354 single-core. These figures place the processor in the 96th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Passmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus show a multi-thread score of 68,574 and a single-thread score of 5,068. The integer math workload records 175,986, while floating point math reaches 229,491. Data compression scores 804,322, data encryption scores 59,097, and extended instructions score 63,506. Prime number finding records 615, physics scores 4,064, and random string sorting scores 96,945.

The Intel Processor U301L, having no benchmarks in the database, cannot be compared directly through head-to-head scores. The database shows zero wins for either processor in the head-to-head comparison fields. The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 93,785, while the U301L records an average of zero due to the absence of test data. The percentile ranking for the U301L sits at 50, which represents the midpoint of all CPUs, but without actual benchmark results, this ranking cannot be tied to specific performance characteristics.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus wins in every measurable category where data exists. Its 24 cores and 24 threads provide substantial parallel processing capability. The processor records a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and a base clock of 3.70 GHz, which directly contributes to its single-thread performance results. The 3 nm process node from TSMC and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die suggest a dense, high-performance design.

The Intel Processor U301L offers different advantages based on its specification profile. It uses 5 cores and 6 threads, which indicates a hybrid architecture with a mix of performance and efficiency cores. Its base clock of 1.20 GHz and boost clock of 2.20 GHz are considerably lower than the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. The 15 W TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained environments, whereas the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a 125 W TDP. The U301L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports only DDR5. The U301L uses Intel Socket 1700 and the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851 and the Arrow Lake Refresh codename.

The U301L has no benchmark wins in the database. Its integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 64EU, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Both have 64 execution units, but the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus graphics are from a newer architecture generation. The U301L has no recorded ECC memory support, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports ECC memory. The U301L provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

The Verdict

The database indicates a clear separation between these two processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a desktop processor with active production status, released on 2026-03-10, and carries a launch MSRP of $299. The Intel Processor U301L is a mobile processor with active production status, released on 2024-04-07, and carries a launch MSRP of $107. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an unlocked multiplier, while the U301L does not.

For users requiring high multi-threaded throughput, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus delivers results in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 confirm strong parallel performance. The nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6520P with an average score of 93,786 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD EPYC 4564P with an average score of 95,183 and a delta of -1.5 percent, the AMD EPYC 9175F with an average score of 95,615 and a delta of -1.9 percent, and the AMD EPYC 4565P with an average score of 95,764 and a delta of -2.1 percent. This places the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus within 2.1 percent of these server-class processors in average benchmark score.

The U301L, with no benchmark data, cannot be positioned against any rivals in the database. Its specifications indicate a low-power mobile part. The choice between the two depends entirely on the target platform and workload requirements. For desktop computing with demanding multi-threaded applications, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the only option with recorded performance data. For mobile or low-power embedded use, the U301L provides a much lower TDP and memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support. No recommendation can be made for the U301L based on performance, as no performance data exists.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has recorded multi-core scores of 44,253 in Cinebench R23, 24,461 in Cinebench R20, and 6,656 in Cinebench R15. The Intel Processor U301L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U301L does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Processor U301L has a boost clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus ranks in the 96th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Processor U301L ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851. The Intel Processor U301L uses Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, with the codename Arrow Lake Refresh and generation listed as Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake). It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The processor contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Intel Processor U301L belongs to the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS and generation listed as Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The database lists no transistor count or die size for this processor. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses DDR5 memory exclusively with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The U301L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the U301L provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ in architecture. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The U301L uses UHD Graphics with 64 execution units. Both have the same execution unit count, but they belong to different graphics architecture families.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The base clock of the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 3.70 GHz, while the U301L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz. The boost clock of the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 5.50 GHz, while the U301L has a boost clock of 2.20 GHz.

The thermal design power differs substantially. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a TDP of 125 W, while the U301L has a TDP of 15 W. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851, while the U301L uses Intel Socket 1700. The process node for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 3 nm from TSMC, while the U301L uses 10 nm from Intel.

The cache configurations differ across all levels. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The U301L has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports ECC memory, while the U301L does not. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an unlocked multiplier, while the U301L is locked.

The market segments differ. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus targets the desktop market, while the U301L targets the mobile market. The release dates show the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus launched on 2026-03-10, while the U301L launched on 2024-04-07. The launch MSRP for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is $299, and for the U301L it is $107. The part numbers are SA4V6 for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and SRPKFQ5CW for the U301L.