Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Intel Processor 300T

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the Intel Processor 300T occupy entirely different performance tiers, as the recorded benchmark data confirms. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus delivers a comprehensive sweep of performance wins across every measured workload category, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Consequently, the comparison is defined by the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus's dominance in multithreaded, single-threaded, and specialized instruction workloads.

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus reaches the 96th percentile among all CPUs, whereas the Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile, a positioning that reflects the latter's dual-core design versus the former's 24-core configuration. The data shows the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus generating an average benchmark score of 93,785, while the Intel Processor 300T's average score remains at zero due to the absence of recorded measurements. In practical terms, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is positioned for demanding desktop workloads, including content creation, data compression, and floating-point intensive tasks, based on its PassMark sub-scores. The Intel Processor 300T, with its two cores and four threads, is clearly configured for basic desktop operations where low power consumption (35 W TDP) takes priority over raw throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different Intel design generations and manufacturing approaches. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses the Arrow Lake Refresh codename and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It incorporates 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The processor package includes 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only, running on a dual-channel bus with a measured bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units. This part uses the Intel Socket 1851.

The Intel Processor 300T belongs to the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed. The die size is 163 mm², with no transistor count recorded. Cache sizes are 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, on a dual-channel bus, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 710. This processor uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the Intel Processor 300T is locked. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus was released in March 2026, while the Intel Processor 300T was released in January 2024. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus carries the part number SA4V6, and the Intel Processor 300T carries the part number SRN3K.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the base clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and the Intel Processor 300T runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300T does not.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851, and the Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What are the power ratings for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a TDP of 125 W, and the Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, and the Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus provides 24 cores and 24 threads, versus 2 cores and 4 threads on the Intel Processor 300T. Base clocks are 3.70 GHz versus 3.40 GHz, and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus adds a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which the Intel Processor 300T lacks entirely. TDP ratings are 125 W for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and 35 W for the Intel Processor 300T. The sockets differ: Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel Processor 300T. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses the Arrow Lake Refresh codename on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S codename on a 10 nm Intel process. Transistor counts are 17,800 million for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, with no figure recorded for the Intel Processor 300T. Die sizes are 243 mm² versus 163 mm². Cache configurations are substantially different: the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3; the Intel Processor 300T has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, compared to DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel Processor 300T. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 115.2 GB/s for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, with none listed for the Intel Processor 300T. ECC memory is supported on the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and not on the Intel Processor 300T. PCIe lanes are 20 for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and 16 for the Intel Processor 300T, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are the Arc Xe-LPG with 64 EUs on the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus the UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel Processor 300T. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel Processor 300T does not. Production status is Active for both.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors, and the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded scores in any benchmark test. As a result, the comparison relies entirely on the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus's individual benchmark results and its standing relative to other CPUs in the database. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus achieves an average benchmark score of 93,785, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6520P with an average score of 93,786 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD EPYC 4564P with an average score of 95,183 and a delta of -1.5 percent, the AMD EPYC 9175F with an average score of 95,615 and a delta of -1.9 percent, and the AMD EPYC 4565P with an average score of 95,764 and a delta of -2.1 percent. These deltas indicate the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores within 2.1 percent of these server-class rivals, with a negligible gap to the Xeon 6520P.

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus's Cinebench results show strong multithreaded capability: 6,656 in R15 multicore, 24,461 in R20 multicore, and 44,253 in R23 multicore. Single-core scores are 354 in R15, 3,453 in R20, and 2,439 in R23. PassMark results further detail the workload profile. The multithread score is 68,574, and the single-thread score is 5,068. Integer math scores 175,986, floating-point math scores 229,491, and extended instructions score 63,506. Data compression reaches 804,322, and data encryption reaches 59,097. Find prime numbers scores 615, random string sorting scores 96,945, and physics scores 4,064. These figures indicate the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus delivers high throughput in parallel workloads, including rendering, scientific computation, and data processing. The Intel Processor 300T, lacking any recorded benchmark scores, cannot be compared numerically. Its lower core count, lower base clock, and absence of a boost clock, combined with a 35 W TDP, indicate a design intended for efficiency rather than performance. The data shows no scenario in which the Intel Processor 300T outperforms the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, as no benchmark results exist for the former.