Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus vs Intel Processor U302L

The database places the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and the Intel Processor U302L in entirely different performance classes. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the U302L sits at the 50th percentile. The recorded benchmark suite for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus produces an average score of 61,834, while the U302L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the U302L uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The two processors also differ fundamentally in core counts, memory support, and PCIe capabilities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus shows overwhelming dominance in every recorded benchmark category. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 4,224 points. Its single-core result in the same test is 596. The U302L has no recorded scores in Cinebench R15, so a direct numeric comparison is impossible, but the percentile gap (93rd versus 50th) indicates the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus operates in a different performance tier.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus delivers 17,603 in multicore and 2,485 in single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 41,913 in multicore and 5,917 in single-core. These results place the processor well above the U302L, which lacks any recorded data. The average benchmark score of 61,834 for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus compares to an average score of 0 for the U302L, confirming that the database contains no measurable performance data for the latter.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus further illustrate its capabilities. Data compression scores 493,179, while data encryption reaches 37,813. Extended instructions produce 39,283, and finding prime numbers yields 482. Floating point math scores 163,567, while integer math reaches 122,449. The multithread score is 48,270, physics scores 3,843, and random string sorting reaches 60,020. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4,764. The U302L has no PassMark entries at all.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus in the database are the Intel Core i9-13900KF with an average score of 61,841, the Intel Core i9-13900K at 61,766, the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61,723, and the Intel Xeon 636 at 61,360. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus trails the i9-13900KF by a negligible amount, is 0.1 percent behind the i9-13900K, 0.2 percent behind the i9-13900T, and 0.8 percent ahead of the Xeon 636. This places the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus in direct competition with high-end desktop processors from the previous generation, despite being a mobile part.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus wins in every measurable category. It has 20 cores and 20 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz. The base clock of the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is 2.40 GHz, compared to 1.20 GHz for the U302L. The thermal design power of the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is 55 watts, while the U302L draws 15 watts.

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses a 30 MB shared L3 cache, while the U302L uses a 10 MB shared L3 cache. Per-core L1 cache is 192 KB for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus versus 80 KB for the U302L. Per-core L2 cache is 3 MB for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus versus 1.25 MB for the U302L. Memory bandwidth for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is 102.4 GB/s, while the U302L has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

The U302L offers no recorded wins in the database. Its integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 80EU, is a different product from the Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU in the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, but no benchmark comparisons exist. The U302L does support DDR4 in addition to DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports only DDR5. This memory flexibility is a minor advantage for systems with existing DDR4 modules, but it does not translate into any performance advantage in the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh codename and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2. Its generation is listed as Ultra 7 with the Arrow Lake-HX architecture. The process node is 3 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The transistor count is 17,800 million, and the die size is 243 mm². The U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename. Its generation is listed as Intel Processor with Raptor Lake. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. The U302L has no recorded transistor count or die size.

These architectural differences explain the performance gap. The 3 nm TSMC process allows the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus to pack 20 cores and a 30 MB L3 cache into a 243 mm² die. The 10 nm Intel process in the U302L accommodates only 5 cores and a 10 MB L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also uses a newer architecture generation, Arrow Lake-HX, compared to the older Raptor Lake in the U302L.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The U302L uses UHD Graphics with 80 execution units. The higher execution unit count in the U302L does not necessarily translate into better graphics performance, as the architecture and memory bandwidth differ significantly. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the U302L has no recorded bandwidth figure, which likely limits its integrated graphics performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 20 cores and 20 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz and 1.20 GHz, respectively. Boost clocks are 5.30 GHz and 2.40 GHz. Thermal design power is 55 watts versus 15 watts. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses Intel BGA 2114, while the U302L uses Intel Socket 1700.

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the U302L supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. Memory support differs: the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports only DDR5, while the U302L supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The multiplier is unlocked on the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, allowing overclocking, while the U302L has a locked multiplier. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a part number of SADST, while the U302L has a part number of SRPKGQ5CX. The release dates differ significantly: the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus was released on 2026-03-16, while the U302L was released on 2024-04-07.

The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both are mobile market segments and both are in active production status.

The cache hierarchy shows substantial differences. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The U302L has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3. No 3D V-Cache is present in either processor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus offers four times the core count and more than three times the thread count.

Q: What is the performance percentile for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The U302L sits at the 50th percentile. This places the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus in the top tier of processors, while the U302L is in the middle of the distribution.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus boosts to 5.30 GHz. The U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a boost clock that is more than double that of the U302L.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports DDR5 only. The U302L supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the U302L has no recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses a 3 nm process fabricated by TSMC. The U302L uses a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also has a recorded transistor count of 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm², while the U302L has neither recorded.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an unlocked multiplier. The U302L has a locked multiplier and does not support overclocking.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the clear choice for any workload requiring high multi-core performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,913 and PassMark multithread score of 48,270 demonstrate substantial capability. The processor sits at the 93rd percentile, competing directly with desktop parts like the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which has an average score of 61,841. The 20 cores, 30 MB L3 cache, and 5.30 GHz boost clock all contribute to this performance level.

The Intel Processor U302L, with no recorded benchmark scores, cannot be evaluated on performance from the database. Its 5 cores, 6 threads, and 2.40 GHz boost clock place it in a much lower tier. The 50th percentile ranking confirms its mid-range positioning. The U302L does offer DDR4 support, which may be useful in systems with existing DDR4 memory, and its 15 watt TDP indicates lower power consumption. However, no performance data exists to support any claim of competitive capability.

For users who need maximum processing power in a mobile form factor, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the only choice supported by the data. For users who prioritize lower power consumption and DDR4 compatibility, the U302L offers those features, but without recorded benchmarks, its performance claims remain unverified in the database. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also benefits from PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes, while the U302L is limited to PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. The architecture differences, including the 3 nm process and newer Arrow Lake-HX generation, further separate the two products. The verdict is straightforward: the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the superior processor in every measured dimension, while the U302L serves a different, lower-performance segment with distinct memory and power characteristics.