Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs Intel Xeon 6325P Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and the Intel Xeon 6325P represent two fundamentally different design philosophies from the same manufacturer, yet they land in a remarkably similar performance bracket. The Ultra 7 268V, a mobile Lunar Lake part with 8 cores and 8 threads, wins the majority of benchmark comparisons, taking 12 of 17 head-to-head tests. The Xeon 6325P, a server/workstation Raptor Lake-R chip with only 4 cores but 8 threads, counters with 5 wins, primarily in sustained multi-core rendering and specific integer workloads. With average benchmark scores of 20897 for the Ultra 7 and 20821 for the Xeon, the overall performance delta is a razor-thin 0.4%, placing both processors at the 74th percentile against all CPUs. This makes the choice between them a matter of workload profile rather than raw capability.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 268V establishes its dominance in single-core and lightly-threaded scenarios, as well as in cryptography and floating-point math. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ultra 7 posts a score of 293 against the Xeon’s 195, a commanding 50.3% lead. This advantage persists in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Ultra 7 scores 972 versus 813, a 19.6% edge. The pattern holds in PassMark’s data encryption test, where the Ultra 7 achieves 13779 points compared to the Xeon’s 9311, a 48% margin. The most extreme divergence appears in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where the Ultra 7’s score of 192 more than triples the Xeon’s 66, a 190.9% difference. Floating-point math also heavily favors the Ultra 7, with a score of 57628 versus 37265, representing a 54.6% advantage. These results paint a clear picture: the Lunar Lake architecture excels at tasks requiring high per-core throughput, quick response times, and efficient handling of mathematical operations.

The Xeon 6325P, despite its lower core count, claims victory in a few critical areas that suggest a different optimization target. Its most significant win comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 13717 against the Ultra 7’s 10653, a 22.3% advantage. This is a notable reversal from the Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests, where the Ultra 7 wins by 16.9% and 19.5% respectively. The Xeon also leads in PassMark integer math, scoring 49151 versus the Ultra 7’s 42669, a 13.2% margin. In single-threaded PassMark tests, the Xeon edges ahead with a score of 4213 versus 4051, a 3.8% difference. The Xeon’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz, higher than the Ultra 7’s 5.00 GHz, likely contributes to these wins. The data suggests the Xeon is tuned for sustained performance in longer rendering workloads and integer-heavy computations, while the Ultra 7 is optimized for burst performance and diverse instruction sets.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is the better choice for users whose workloads involve encryption, floating-point calculations, physics simulations, and general multi-threaded responsiveness. Its 48% lead in data encryption and 58.5% lead in PassMark physics are decisive. The Ultra 7 also wins PassMark multithread with 19297 points against the Xeon’s 16138, a 19.6% margin, and leads in random string sorting by 17.3%. For a mobile platform, it delivers these results with a TDP of 17 watts, compared to the Xeon’s 55 watts, though power efficiency is not directly benchmarked here. The Ultra 7’s 12 wins across the head-to-head suite make it the default recommendation for most general-purpose and scientific computing tasks.

The Intel Xeon 6325P should be selected when sustained multi-core rendering performance is the priority, as demonstrated by its 22.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its advantage in integer math (13.2%) and single-threaded PassMark performance (3.8%) also makes it suitable for specific server-side workloads that process large integer datasets or require maximum per-thread throughput in older benchmark suites. The Xeon’s support for ECC memory, a feature absent on the Ultra 7, positions it for reliability-critical environments. However, its 4-core configuration limits its appeal in multi-threaded applications outside of the Cinebench R23 test, where it manages to outperform the 8-core Ultra 7. For users needing a server-grade processor with ECC support and a launch MSRP of $281, the Xeon offers a specialized profile. The Ultra 7, with no launch MSRP listed, targets mobile devices where its integrated Arc 140V graphics and 3 nm process node provide additional advantages not present in the Xeon’s feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the comparison is the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where the Xeon 6325P defeats the Ultra 7 268V by 22.3%, scoring 13717 versus 10653. This is the largest win for the Xeon and stands in contrast to the earlier Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ultra 7 wins with 1616 points against 1382, a 16.9% margin. The Ultra 7 extends this in Cinebench R20 multi-core with 6887 points versus 5761, a 19.5% lead. The reversal in R23 suggests that the Xeon’s architecture scales better under extended load conditions, possibly due to its higher base clock of 3.50 GHz compared to the Ultra 7’s 2.20 GHz.

Single-core performance shows a clear split between the two benchmarks. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ultra 7 wins by 50.3% with 293 points against 195. This margin narrows to 19.6% in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Ultra 7 scores 972 against 813. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Xeon narrowly wins with 1936 points versus 1921, a 0.8% margin. This inconsistency across benchmark versions highlights the different optimization levels in each architecture. The PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests both show the Xeon winning by 3.8%, with scores of 4213 against 4051.

The PassMark suite reveals the Ultra 7’s strengths in specialized operations. In data compression, the Ultra 7 scores 181443 against 178020, a narrow 1.9% win. Data encryption shows a massive 48% advantage for the Ultra 7, with 13779 points versus 9311. Extended instructions favor the Ultra 7 by 31.6%, with scores of 15323 against 11645. The find prime numbers test delivers the largest delta of the entire comparison, with the Ultra 7 scoring 192 against the Xeon’s 66, a 190.9% difference. Floating-point math sees the Ultra 7 ahead by 54.6%, scoring 57628 versus 37265. Integer math is the Xeon’s territory, with the Xeon scoring 49151 against 42669, a 13.2% win. The multithread test shows the Ultra 7 ahead by 19.6% with 19297 points versus 16138. Physics simulation favors the Ultra 7 by 58.5%, with 1617 points against 1020. Random string sorting completes the picture with the Ultra 7 winning by 17.3%, scoring 22416 against 19113.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in PassMark?

A: The Intel Xeon 6325P has a higher PassMark single-thread score of 4213, compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V’s 4051, giving the Xeon a 3.8% advantage.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Xeon 6325P wins Cinebench R23 multi-core with a score of 13717, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V scores 10653, resulting in a 22.3% advantage for the Xeon.

Q: What is the largest performance difference between the two chips?

A: The largest delta is in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V scores 192 against the Intel Xeon 6325P’s 66, a 190.9% difference in favor of the Ultra 7.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, only the Intel Xeon 6325P supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V does not have ECC support.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores, while the Intel Xeon 6325P has 4 cores. Both have 8 threads.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has an average benchmark score of 20897, while the Intel Xeon 6325P has an average of 20821. This places both at the 74th percentile against all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and Intel Xeon 6325P diverge significantly in their underlying architectures. The Ultra 7 is built on the Lunar Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket and is designed for the mobile market segment. It includes an integrated Arc 140V GPU and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The Ultra 7 does not support ECC memory and has a TDP of 17 watts. Its memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with a dual-channel memory bus.

The Intel Xeon 6325P uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 163 mm². This processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and targets the server/workstation market segment. It has no integrated graphics and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Xeon supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support. Its TDP is 55 watts. The Xeon’s higher base clock and boost clock, combined with its larger PCIe lane allocation, make it suited for workstation tasks, while the Ultra 7’s smaller process node, higher core count, and integrated graphics target power-efficient mobile computing. The Ultra 7’s release date is 2024-09-23, while the Xeon was released on 2025-02-23.