Intel Core Ultra 5 225T vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and the Intel Processor U302L. The head-to-head field is empty, and the U302L has no individual benchmark scores listed. This makes a direct numeric comparison impossible. The Core Ultra 5 225T, by contrast, has a full suite of 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests. Its average benchmark score is 30468, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The U302L carries an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than an actual performance level.

For the Core Ultra 5 225T, the strongest recorded results come from multi-threaded workloads. It scores 21971 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9227 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The single-core results are also substantial: 3101 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1302 in Cinebench R20 single-core. Passmark results show 25358 in multi-thread, 4348 in single-thread, 82751 in floating point math, and 59543 in integer math. Data compression reaches 233998, while data encryption hits 18289. Extended instructions score 20083, random string sorting reaches 28774, and find prime numbers returns 284. Physics processing records 2053.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 225T provide context for these scores. The Intel Core i9-11980HK averages 30422, which is 0.2% behind the 225T. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS averages 30390, also 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U averages 30364, again 0.3% behind. The only rival ahead is the Intel Core i5-13600H with an average of 30548, which is 0.3% ahead. These deltas are tiny, meaning the 225T sits in a tightly packed performance band around the 30400 to 30500 average score range. The benchmark data indicates the Core Ultra 5 225T is competitive with these mobile and desktop processors, though the differences are marginal.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families and use different manufacturing processes. The Core Ultra 5 225T belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, and is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The U302L uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The transistor count for the 225T is 17,800 million, while the U302L has no recorded transistor count. The die size for the 225T is 243 mm², while the U302L has no recorded die size.

Core counts differ substantially. The 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads, which indicates one hyper-threaded core. Base and boost clocks also diverge. The 225T runs at a 2.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.90 GHz. The U302L runs at a 1.20 GHz base clock and boosts to 2.40 GHz. The 225T has a 65 W TDP, while the U302L has a 15 W TDP.

Cache layouts are different in both size and organization. The 225T has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The U302L has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The 225T supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The U302L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The 225T uses Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The U302L uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics differ as well. The 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. The U302L uses UHD Graphics with 80 execution units. The sockets are incompatible: the 225T uses Intel Socket 1851, while the U302L uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments differ, with the 225T aimed at desktop and the U302L aimed at mobile. Release dates are also different. The 225T has a release date of 2024-12-31, while the U302L has a release date of 2024-04-07. The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285. The 225T has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 225T has the only recorded benchmark data in this comparison, so its wins are documented across every test category. The multi-core results are particularly strong, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21971 and Passmark multi-thread at 25358. The single-core results are also notable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3101 and Passmark single-thread at 4348. The data shows the 225T is a capable processor for both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks. The floating point math score of 82751 and integer math score of 59543 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 233998 suggests good performance in archiving and storage-related workloads. Data encryption at 18289 and extended instructions at 20083 show solid results for security and vectorized operations.

The U302L has no recorded wins because no benchmark scores exist for it. Any assessment of where it might win must be qualitative. It has a 15 W TDP versus 65 W for the 225T, which suggests it is designed for low-power mobile environments. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving platform flexibility. Its integrated graphics has 80 execution units, five times the execution unit count of the 225T's 16 execution units, which could favor graphics workloads despite the lower overall CPU performance envelope. The U302L also uses Intel Socket 1700, which is an established platform, while the 225T uses the newer Intel Socket 1851.

The use-case split is clear from the data. The 225T belongs in desktop builds where multi-threaded performance and high boost clocks matter. The U302L belongs in mobile systems where power efficiency and platform compatibility take priority. The 225T has a higher base clock by 1.30 GHz, a higher boost clock by 2.50 GHz, double the core count, and double the L3 cache. The U302L has a much lower TDP, which is the primary differentiator for thermally constrained environments.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The 225T has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The 225T has an average benchmark score of 30468 and is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The U302L has an average benchmark score of 0 and is in the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The 225T supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration. The U302L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration.

Q: What sockets do the processors use?

A: The 225T uses Intel Socket 1851. The U302L uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The 225T has a TDP of 65 W. The U302L has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. The U302L uses UHD Graphics with 80 execution units.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors are extensive. The 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The base clock is 2.50 GHz for the 225T and 1.20 GHz for the U302L. The boost clock is 4.90 GHz for the 225T and 2.40 GHz for the U302L. The TDP is 65 W for the 225T and 15 W for the U302L. The socket is Intel Socket 1851 for the 225T and Intel Socket 1700 for the U302L.

The architectures differ: Arrow Lake for the 225T, Raptor Lake for the U302L. The process node is 3 nm at TSMC for the 225T and 10 nm at Intel for the U302L. The 225T has 17,800 million transistors and a 243 mm² die size; the U302L has no recorded transistor count or die size. L1 cache is 192 KB per core for the 225T and 80 KB per core for the U302L. L2 cache is 3 MB per core for the 225T and 1.25 MB per core for the U302L. L3 cache is 20 MB shared for the 225T and 10 MB shared for the U302L.

Memory support differs. The 225T supports only DDR5, while the U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 102.4 GB/s for the 225T and not recorded for the U302L. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes for the 225T and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the U302L. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU for the 225T and UHD Graphics 80EU for the U302L. Market segment is desktop for the 225T and mobile for the U302L. Release dates are 2024-12-31 for the 225T and 2024-04-07 for the U302L. The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285; the 225T has no recorded launch MSRP. The U302L has a recorded part number of SRPKGQ5CX, while the 225T has an unknown part number. Both processors have locked multipliers and do not support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T in every measured performance category. It has a full set of recorded scores, an average benchmark score of 30468, and an 82nd percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.3% of its average score, confirm it sits in a competitive performance tier. The 10 cores, 4.90 GHz boost clock, 20 MB of L3 cache, and 65 W TDP make it a desktop-oriented processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results.

The Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmark scores, so no performance verdict can be drawn from the database. Its specifications point to a low-power mobile part: 15 W TDP, 5 cores, 1.20 GHz base clock, and 2.40 GHz boost clock. Its dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 and its 80 execution unit integrated graphics give it platform flexibility and potentially stronger integrated graphics throughput, though the CPU compute capability is far below the 225T based on clock speed and core count.

The choice depends on the target environment. For a desktop system where compute performance is the priority, the 225T is the only option with recorded evidence of capability. For a mobile or low-power system where energy consumption and thermal output are primary constraints, the 15 W U302L is the appropriate selection, though its actual performance cannot be quantified from the available data. The 225T also carries the advantage of a newer 3 nm process, a newer socket, and Gen 5 PCIe connectivity. The U302L counters with an established socket, dual memory type support, and a much lower power envelope. The data does not support a performance comparison, only a specification and workload context comparison.