Intel Core i9-14901TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the pack. This asymmetry shapes the comparison. The Core Ultra 9 288V delivers a measured Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10178 and a single-core score of 1950. In Cinebench R20, it records 7069 multi-core and 997 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 1583 multi-core and 301.5 single-core.

The PassMark suite provides a broader picture. The Core Ultra 9 288V reaches 4274 in single-thread tests, with a multi-thread score of 19810. Data compression workloads produce 186521, while encryption yields 14141. Extended instructions score 15613, and prime number finding records 195. Floating point math hits 59536, integer math reaches 44019, physics simulation scores 1637, and random string sorting lands at 22622.

Since the i9-14901TE has no benchmark entries in the database, direct head-to-head numeric wins cannot be established. The Core Ultra 9 288V stands alone in the measured results. Its percentile ranking of 76 versus all CPUs indicates that it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 23219 places it near several notable rivals. The Intel Core i9-11900F sits at 23254, a delta of -0.2 percent. The AMD EPYC 4124P records 23167, a delta of 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H reaches 23277, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V posts 23297, a delta of -0.3 percent. These margins are narrow, all within a fraction of a percent. The data shows that the Core Ultra 9 288V competes effectively with these established desktop and mobile parts, despite its mobile orientation.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, simply because it has measurable results while the i9-14901TE has none. The Core Ultra 9 288V occupies the 76th percentile among all CPUs in the database, a strong position. Its average score of 23219 aligns closely with the nearest rivals, all of which are within 0.3 percent of its performance. This suggests that the Core Ultra 9 288V delivers competitive multi-threaded and single-threaded performance for its class.

The i9-14901TE, despite being a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, lacks any recorded benchmarks. The database cannot confirm its performance level. Potential buyers should note that the Core Ultra 9 288V has validated scores across multiple test suites, including Cinebench and PassMark. The i9-14901TE remains an unmeasured entity in this dataset.

For workloads represented by the test suites, the Core Ultra 9 288V shows balanced capabilities. The single-thread score of 4274 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance, useful for lightly threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 19810 demonstrates substantial parallel throughput, suitable for rendering or compilation tasks. The data compression score of 186521 and encryption score of 14141 point to solid performance in data-centric operations.

The i9-14901TE, with its higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz and larger 36 MB shared L3 cache, might theoretically offer advantages, but no numbers exist to confirm this. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the Core Ultra 9 288V is the only part with empirical evidence, and that evidence shows a capable, well-rounded processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V?

A: The average benchmark score is 23219, with a percentile ranking of 76 among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 288V compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It sits within 0.3 percent of four rivals: the Intel Core i9-11900F (23254, delta -0.2), AMD EPYC 4124P (23167, delta 0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (23277, delta -0.2), and Intel Core Ultra 7 266V (23297, delta -0.3).

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark list, with an average score of 0 and no recorded tests.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 results for the Core Ultra 9 288V?

A: The multi-core score is 10178, and the single-core score is 1950.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the Core Ultra 9 288V support?

A: It supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: What is the thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several core specifications. The i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 9 288V has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The i9-14901TE supports 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V supports 8 threads. The i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45, whereas the Core Ultra 9 288V has a TDP of 30.

The socket types differ entirely. The i9-14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Intel BGA 2833. The memory support also differs: the i9-14901TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 9 288V supports only LPDDR5X. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the Core Ultra 9 288V lists a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the i9-14901TE has no bandwidth figure recorded.

ECC memory support differs: the i9-14901TE supports ECC, while the Core Ultra 9 288V does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the i9-14901TE provides 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 9 288V provides 4 lanes (CPU only). Both support PCIe Gen 5. The integrated graphics differ: the i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Arc 140V.

Market segments differ: the i9-14901TE is a desktop processor, while the Core Ultra 9 288V is a mobile processor. Release dates also differ: the i9-14901TE released on 2024-06-30, while the Core Ultra 9 288V released on 2024-09-23. The part numbers differ as well: the i9-14901TE is Q49CSRNJJ, while the Core Ultra 9 288V is SRPMSSRPMWQ5JTQ5JUQ5KW. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is significant. The i9-14901TE uses Raptor Lake architecture, with the codename Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core i9 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake architecture, with the codename Lunar Lake, and belongs to the Ultra 9 generation. The process nodes differ: the i9-14901TE uses 10 nm silicon from Intel, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses 3 nm silicon from TSMC. This process difference likely contributes to the power and efficiency gap, though the numbers for power consumption are not directly compared here.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The i9-14901TE has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, L2 of 2 MB per core, and L3 of 36 MB shared. The Core Ultra 9 288V has an L1 cache of 192 KB per core, L2 of 2.5 MB per core, and L3 of 12 MB shared. The larger L3 on the i9-14901TE suggests a design optimized for data-heavy desktop workloads, while the larger per-core L1 and L2 on the Core Ultra 9 288V indicate a focus on rapid single-thread execution.

The foundries differ: Intel produces the i9-14901TE, while TSMC produces the Core Ultra 9 288V. The die size is recorded for the i9-14901TE at 257 mm², while no die size is listed for the Core Ultra 9 288V. Transistor counts are not available for either chip. The integrated graphics architectures also differ, with UHD Graphics 770 on the i9-14901TE and Arc 140V on the Core Ultra 9 288V.

Memory architecture reflects the platform split: the i9-14901TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, enabling flexibility in desktop builds, while the Core Ultra 9 288V is locked to LPDDR5X, a low-power mobile memory standard. The i9-14901TE also supports ECC, which is absent on the Core Ultra 9 288V, suggesting the desktop part targets reliability-sensitive environments.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 9 288V wins in every measurable benchmark category because it has data. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4274 indicates strong per-core performance, which benefits applications like web browsing, office productivity, and light scripting. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1950 reinforces this strength. For multi-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10178 and PassMark multi-thread score of 19810 show that 8 threads can handle parallel workloads effectively, though the thread count is lower than the i9-14901TE's 16 threads.

The Core Ultra 9 288V also wins in efficiency-oriented scenarios based on the recorded TDP of 30, which is lower than the i9-14901TE's 45. The mobile market segment and BGA 2833 socket indicate it is designed for laptops and compact devices, where power draw matters. The memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s is a recorded advantage, likely benefiting memory-intensive tasks like data compression, which scored 186521.

The i9-14901TE wins on paper in several architectural aspects, even without benchmarks. It has a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 5.10 GHz, which could translate to faster single-thread bursts, though the Core Ultra 9 288V's higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.30 GHz suggests better sustained low-load performance. The i9-14901TE has 16 threads versus 8, potentially doubling throughput in heavily threaded workloads if the per-core performance is comparable. The 36 MB shared L3 cache is triple the Core Ultra 9 288V's 12 MB, likely reducing memory latency for large datasets. The 16 PCIe lanes versus 4 lanes allow more expansion devices, and ECC support adds data integrity capabilities.

The i9-14901TE also wins in desktop context: the Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders memory choice. The 257 mm² die size indicates a larger chip, possibly with more robust power delivery for sustained loads. The production status for both is Active, so neither is discontinued.

In data-driven terms, the Core Ultra 9 288V owns all recorded scores. The i9-14901TE remains a theoretical contender with no empirical evidence. For users who prioritize verified performance, the Core Ultra 9 288V is the clear choice. For those who need ECC, more threads, larger L3, or a desktop socket, the i9-14901TE offers those features, but the database cannot confirm how well it executes. The benchmark results indicate the Core Ultra 9 288V delivers competitive, well-rounded performance, while the i9-14901TE's capabilities await measurement.