Intel Core i9-14901TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H Comparison

Intel Core i9-14901TE and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H represent two distinct approaches to CPU design within Intel’s current lineup. The i9-14901TE is a desktop part from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture, while the Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, using Arrow Lake architecture. The database contains benchmark results only for the Core Ultra 7 255H, so the comparison relies on that recorded data, the specification sheets, and the relative performance categories.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmarks for the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H provide a clear picture of its performance across synthetic workloads. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1515, while the single-core score is 251. The multicore result indicates strong parallel processing capability for a mobile chip, but the single-core figure is modest relative to desktop parts. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 6381, and the single-core score reaches 900. Cinebench R23 shows a multicore score of 9240 and a single-core score of 1843. These progressive scores across Cinebench versions confirm that the Core Ultra 7 255H scales well with increased rendering workloads, with the multicore results improving significantly as the test becomes more demanding.

Geekbench results for the Core Ultra 7 255H show a multicore score of 14024 and a single-core score of 2335. The multicore figure is more than six times the single-core figure, which aligns with the chip’s 16-core, 16-thread configuration. PassMark tests provide additional granularity. The multithread score is 30703, while the single-thread score is 4317. Data compression yields 298850, data encryption reaches 23395, and extended instructions score 23755. Floating point math records 98796, integer math scores 77975, and find prime numbers returns 303. Physics scores 2254, and random string sorting reaches 36058. These numbers show that the Core Ultra 7 255H excels in integer and floating-point operations, with the data compression score being particularly high compared to other PassMark subtests.

Since the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark entries in the database, direct head-to-head scores are unavailable. However, the average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 7 255H is 33537, and it holds the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The Core i9-14901TE sits at the 50th percentile, which indicates that, based on the database’s aggregate metrics, the Core Ultra 7 255H is positioned substantially higher in overall performance ranking. The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 7 255H include the AMD Ryzen 5 240 with an average score of 33542 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS at 33667 with a delta of -0.4 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX also at 33668 with a delta of -0.4 percent, and the Intel Core i5-12600HX at 33375 with a delta of 0.5 percent. These deltas show that the Core Ultra 7 255H is within half a percent of these rivals, effectively matching them in aggregate benchmark performance. The Ryzen 7 8840HS and Ryzen 5 7645HX are slightly ahead by 0.4 percent, while the Core i5-12600HX trails by 0.5 percent. This tight grouping suggests that the Core Ultra 7 255H delivers competitive performance in its mobile segment, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 7 255H doubles the core count but maintains the same thread count, indicating that the i9-14901TE uses hyper-threading while the Core Ultra 7 255H relies on additional physical cores.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare?

A: The Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 255H has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The i9-14901TE operates at higher frequencies in both base and boost states, which can benefit single-threaded tasks.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) difference?

A: The Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Core Ultra 7 255H has a TDP of 28 watts. The mobile chip consumes less power, which is typical for its segment, while the desktop chip allows for a higher power envelope.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 255H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The desktop part offers 12 MB more L3 cache, which can reduce memory latency in certain workloads.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Core i9-14901TE and the Core Ultra 7 255H have the multiplier unlocked set to false. Neither processor supports user-controlled multiplier adjustment.

Q: What integrated graphics are included?

A: The Core i9-14901TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Core Ultra 7 255H includes Arc Graphics 140T. The Arc Graphics 140T is a more recent GPU design, while UHD Graphics 770 is based on the older Xe architecture.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 255H wins in scenarios that favor high core counts and efficiency. Its 16-core configuration provides a raw parallel throughput advantage in heavily threaded applications such as video rendering, 3D simulation, and data processing. The benchmark data supports this: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9240 and the PassMark multithread score of 30703 indicate strong scaling across many threads. Additionally, the 28-watt TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal and power constraints are tight. The 3 nm process node from TSMC contributes to efficiency, allowing the chip to deliver competitive performance within a lower power budget.

The Core i9-14901TE wins in scenarios where high clock speeds and desktop-class power delivery are critical. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is 0.40 GHz higher than the Core Ultra 7 255H’s 5.10 GHz, which can improve responsiveness in single-threaded workloads like legacy software, certain games, and lightly threaded productivity tools. The larger L3 cache of 36 MB versus 24 MB also helps in workloads with repeated data access patterns. The desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700) allows for robust cooling solutions, and the 45-watt TDP provides more headroom for sustained performance compared to the mobile chip. For users with a desktop environment, the i9-14901TE’s higher frequencies and larger cache can deliver better latency-sensitive performance.

The Core Ultra 7 255H’s memory bandwidth is recorded at 102.4 GB/s, a figure that is not available for the i9-14901TE. This bandwidth advantage can benefit memory-intensive tasks such as data compression, where the PassMark score of 298850 is notably high. The i9-14901TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 7 255H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, giving the mobile chip access to lower-power memory options.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Core i9-14901TE is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile part with 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.30 GHz for the i9-14901TE and 2.00 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Boost clocks are 5.50 GHz and 5.10 GHz, respectively. TDP is 45 watts for the desktop chip and 28 watts for the mobile chip. The i9-14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses Intel BGA 2049, reflecting their different mounting designs. The process node differs: the i9-14901TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses a 3 nm process at TSMC. The die size is listed as 257 mm² for the i9-14901TE, with no die size recorded for the Core Ultra 7 255H.

Cache configurations vary. The i9-14901TE has L1 cache of 80 KB per core, L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and L3 cache of 36 MB shared. The Core Ultra 7 255H has L1 cache of 192 KB per core, L2 cache of 3 MB per core, and L3 cache of 24 MB shared. The mobile chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, but the desktop chip has more total L3 cache. Memory support: the i9-14901TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 255H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both are dual-channel, but the Core Ultra 7 255H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is absent for the i9-14901TE. ECC memory support is present on both. PCIe lanes differ: the i9-14901TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 255H provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the i9-14901TE and Arc Graphics 140T for the Core Ultra 7 255H. The release dates are June 30, 2024 for the i9-14901TE and January 12, 2025 for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The Core i9-14901TE is based on Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core i9 generation within the Raptor Lake Refresh lineup. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The Core Ultra 7 255H is based on Arrow Lake architecture, codenamed Arrow Lake-H, and belongs to the Ultra 7 generation. It uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. This node difference is significant: the 3 nm process allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency compared to the 10 nm process, which explains the Core Ultra 7 255H’s lower TDP despite having twice the core count.

The core designs also differ. Raptor Lake is a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact core mix for the i9-14901TE. Arrow Lake continues this hybrid approach with updated core microarchitectures, and the Core Ultra 7 255H’s 16-core configuration likely uses a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The larger per-core L1 cache (192 KB versus 80 KB) and L2 cache (3 MB versus 2 MB) on the Core Ultra 7 255H suggest a redesigned cache hierarchy for Arrow Lake, which can improve per-thread performance despite lower clock speeds. The i9-14901TE compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 36 MB versus 24 MB, which benefits workloads that rely on a large pool of last-level cache.

The integrated GPU architecture differs as well. UHD Graphics 770 is part of the Raptor Lake die, while Arc Graphics 140T is a more advanced GPU integrated into Arrow Lake. The Arc Graphics 140T likely offers better media encoding and compute capabilities, though the database does not provide benchmark scores for either iGPU. The memory controller differences are notable: the i9-14901TE supports older DDR4 alongside DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 255H supports only newer DDR5 and the power-efficient LPDDR5X. This reflects the mobile chip’s focus on bandwidth and power efficiency, while the desktop chip maintains backward compatibility for cost-sensitive builds.

The production status for both is listed as active, indicating ongoing availability. The part numbers are Q49CSRNJJ for the i9-14901TE and SRQAN for the Core Ultra 7 255H. The percentile ranking in the database places the Core Ultra 7 255H at 83, well above the i9-14901TE’s 50, which reflects the aggregate performance data collected across all CPUs. The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 7 255H is 33537, while the i9-14901TE has an average score of 0 in the current records, meaning no benchmark data has been collected for it. This absence makes direct performance comparisons limited, but the specification differences and the Core Ultra 7 255H’s recorded scores provide a basis for understanding their respective roles.