Intel Core i9-14901TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Comparison

Intel Core i9-14901TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

The database records show two Intel processors from different generations and market segments. The Core i9-14901TE is a desktop part from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the Core Ultra 5 226V is a mobile processor built on Lunar Lake architecture. Their benchmark profiles differ sharply, with the Core Ultra 5 226V holding a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Core i9-14901TE sits at the 50th percentile. The Core Ultra 5 226V also carries an average benchmark score of 19368, though the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparisons. This analysis relies on the available data for the mobile part and the specification differences between the two.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, and the Core i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark list. Therefore, all performance numbers in this section come from the Core Ultra 5 226V’s recorded scores. The Core Ultra 5 226V delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and a single-core score of 1744. In Cinebench R20, it records 6381 for multicore and 900 for single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multicore score of 1501 and a single-core score of 267. Geekbench results include a multicore score of 8598 and a single-core score of 1930.

Passmark results further detail the Core Ultra 5 226V’s capabilities. The multithread score is 17850, while the single-thread score sits at 3754. Integer math reaches 38647, and floating point math hits 52270. Data compression scores 170687, data encryption scores 12710, and extended instructions score 14724. Random string sorting records 20813, and find prime numbers yields 166. Physics testing produces a score of 1449.

Without any benchmark entries for the Core i9-14901TE, the database cannot confirm which processor wins specific workloads. The Core Ultra 5 226V’s percentile rank of 73 indicates it outperforms most CPUs in the database, but the Core i9-14901TE’s 50th percentile suggests an average standing. The Core Ultra 5 226V’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS with an average score of 19364 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-1345U with a score of 19411 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K with a score of 19238 and a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F with a score of 19499 and a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas are all within one percentage point, meaning the Core Ultra 5 226V performs nearly identically to those four processors in average benchmark terms.

The Verdict

The data suggests the Core Ultra 5 226V is the more capable processor in terms of recorded benchmark performance, given its 73rd percentile ranking and average score of 19368. The Core i9-14901TE, despite its higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to 4.50 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 226V, has no benchmark scores to substantiate any performance advantage. The Core i9-14901TE does offer 16 threads versus 8 threads for the Core Ultra 5 226V, which could favor multithreaded workloads, but the absence of data prevents confirmation.

The Core Ultra 5 226V also has a substantially lower TDP of 17 watts versus 45 watts for the Core i9-14901TE. For mobile or power-constrained environments, the Core Ultra 5 226V appears far more efficient. The Core i9-14901TE targets desktop systems with an Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses Intel BGA 2833 for mobile platforms. Users requiring a desktop processor with high clock speeds and ECC memory support might choose the Core i9-14901TE, but the recorded benchmark data favors the Core Ultra 5 226V.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core benchmark score?

A: Only the Core Ultra 5 226V has recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1744, and its Geekbench single-core score is 1930. The Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark data.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has a TDP of 17 watts.

Q: How many threads does each processor support?

A: The Core i9-14901TE supports 16 threads from 8 cores, while the Core Ultra 5 226V supports 8 threads from 8 cores.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 226V support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core Ultra 5 226V has ECC memory support listed as false. The Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Core i9-14901TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses a 3 nm process from TSMC.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Thread counts differ: 16 threads for the Core i9-14901TE versus 8 threads for the Core Ultra 5 226V. TDP values are 45 watts and 17 watts, respectively. The Core i9-14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses Intel BGA 2833.

Cache configurations also differ. The Core i9-14901TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 226V has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support shows DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core i9-14901TE, while the Core Ultra 5 226V lists memory support as unknown and dependent on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe lanes differ: the Core i9-14901TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 226V provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ, with the Core i9-14901TE featuring UHD Graphics 770 and the Core Ultra 5 226V featuring Arc 130V.

Architecture Differences

The Core i9-14901TE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The die size is 257 mm². The Core Ultra 5 226V is built on Lunar Lake architecture from the Ultra 5 (Lunar Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. No die size is recorded for the Core Ultra 5 226V.

The Core i9-14901TE has a market segment of Desktop, while the Core Ultra 5 226V targets Mobile. Both are active in production status. Release dates differ: the Core i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30, and the Core Ultra 5 226V was released on 2024-09-23. Neither processor has a multiplier unlocked. Part numbers are Q49CSRNJJ for the Core i9-14901TE and SRPMQSRPMR for the Core Ultra 5 226V.

The Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory, while the Core Ultra 5 226V does not. The Core i9-14901TE has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB shared, whereas the Core Ultra 5 226V has a smaller 8 MB shared L3 cache. However, the Core Ultra 5 226V has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 versus 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 for the Core i9-14901TE. The foundry differs: Intel for the Core i9-14901TE and TSMC for the Core Ultra 5 226V.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows the Core Ultra 5 226V wins in benchmark performance categories because it is the only processor with scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and single-core score of 1744 indicate strong performance for both threaded and single-threaded tasks. Passmark multithread at 17850 and single-thread at 3754 reinforce this. The Core Ultra 5 226V also excels in efficiency, with a 17 watt TDP, making it suitable for mobile systems where power draw matters.

The Core i9-14901TE wins in raw specification areas. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz exceeds the Core Ultra 5 226V’s 4.50 GHz. It supports 16 threads, double the Core Ultra 5 226V’s 8 threads, which could benefit heavily parallel workloads if benchmark data existed. The larger 36 MB L3 cache versus 8 MB may reduce memory latency in certain tasks. ECC memory support gives it an edge in reliability-focused desktop applications. The desktop socket and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide more expansion capability compared to the mobile part’s 4 lanes.

For specific use cases, the Core Ultra 5 226V appears better suited for portable devices, given its 17 watt TDP and mobile BGA package. Its benchmark scores place it in the 73rd percentile, and its nearest rivals, all within 0.7 percent delta, suggest consistent performance across similar processors. The Core i9-14901TE, with a 50th percentile and no recorded benchmarks, remains unproven in the database. Users seeking a desktop processor with high clock speeds and ECC support might favor the Core i9-14901TE, but the data does not confirm its performance level. The Core Ultra 5 226V’s recorded scores provide a clear picture of its capabilities, making it the only processor with measurable wins in this comparison.