Intel Core i9-14901E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i9-14901E delivers a decisive performance advantage over the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL across every measurable benchmark in the database. The i9-14901E holds an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL sits in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmark results are available for comparison. This absence of data for the Core Ultra 7 155HL means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the i9-14901E's recorded measurements, which show a processor optimized for sustained multi-threaded workloads and high-frequency single-core tasks.

The i9-14901E posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753, a figure that places it among the top performers in its class. Its single-core score of 3635 in the same test reinforces a balanced design, where both parallel and sequential workloads benefit from the 5.60 GHz boost clock. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result of 10816 and single-core result of 1526 follow the same pattern, with the single-core performance trailing only the most aggressive desktop parts. The Cinebench R15 scores of 2595 multi-core and 366 single-core complete a consistent picture of a chip that scales well across rendering and simulation tasks.

PassMark results further illustrate the i9-14901E's strengths. The multi-thread score of 30298 and single-thread score of 4354 confirm its capability in both heavily threaded and latency-sensitive applications. Integer math reaches 112736, floating point math hits 81089, and extended instructions score 17249, showing strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores 288777, while data encryption reaches 18571 and random string sorting achieves 39138. The find prime numbers test returns 189, and the physics test scores 3041. These figures indicate a processor that handles computational density well, though the encryption and prime number results suggest modest performance in specific cryptographic and number-theoretic tasks relative to its other scores.

The nearest rivals for the i9-14901E provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 averages 37904, a delta of 0 percent, making it a direct competitor. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X averages 37943, a delta of -0.1 percent, placing the i9-14901E slightly behind. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829, a delta of 0.2 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 averages 37804, a delta of 0.3 percent. These narrow margins show the i9-14901E sits at parity with current mid-range and embedded alternatives, with no single rival holding a commanding lead.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14901E compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL in benchmark scores?

A: The i9-14901E has a recorded average benchmark score of 37911 and sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Core Ultra 7 155HL has an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded benchmarks, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for the two processors?

A: The i9-14901E has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 155HL has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a TDP of 65, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has a TDP of 45.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What integrated graphics are included with each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from distinct Intel architectures that shape their performance profiles. The Intel Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. Its generation is listed as Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Meteor Lake, with the Meteor Lake-PS codename, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1. Its generation is Ultra 7 (Meteor Lake-PS). These architectural differences explain the divergence in core counts, clock speeds, and cache configurations.

The manufacturing process separates the two as well. The i9-14901E is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The Core Ultra 7 155HL uses a 7 nm process node, also by Intel, though its die size is not recorded. The smaller process node for the Core Ultra 7 155HL suggests a more modern manufacturing approach, but the i9-14901E's larger die accommodates a substantial 36 MB shared L3 cache, compared to the Core Ultra 7 155HL's 24 MB shared L3 cache. Both processors use a 2 MB per core L2 cache, but the L1 cache differs: the i9-14901E has 80 KB per core, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL has 112 KB per core.

Memory support also diverges. The i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The Core Ultra 7 155HL supports DDR5, with the database noting that support depends on the motherboard, also in a dual-channel configuration, and it does not support ECC memory. The memory bandwidth for the Core Ultra 7 155HL is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the i9-14901E's bandwidth is not listed. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the i9-14901E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 155HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the i9-14901E a substantial advantage in expansion and data transfer headroom for high-throughput devices.

Specification Differences

The specification table highlights several key differences between the two processors. The core count is the most obvious gap: the i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads. Despite having half the cores, the i9-14901E achieves higher clock speeds, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, compared to the Core Ultra 7 155HL's base clock of 1.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This clock advantage likely compensates for the core deficit in single-threaded tasks.

The TDP figures differ by 20: the i9-14901E is rated at 65, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL is rated at 45. The sockets are incompatible, with the i9-14901E using Intel Socket 1700 and the Core Ultra 7 155HL using Intel Socket 1851. The process node differs, with the i9-14901E on 10 nm and the Core Ultra 7 155HL on 7 nm. The L3 cache is larger on the i9-14901E at 36 MB shared, versus 24 MB shared on the Core Ultra 7 155HL. The L1 cache is smaller per core on the i9-14901E at 80 KB, versus 112 KB on the Core Ultra 7 155HL. Memory support, PCIe generation and lane count, ECC support, and integrated graphics all differ as detailed in the architecture section. The release dates also differ, with the Core Ultra 7 155HL released on 2024-04-07 and the i9-14901E released on 2024-06-30. The launch MSRP for the Core Ultra 7 155HL is $438, while the i9-14901E has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data favors the Intel Core i9-14901E for users who need confirmed performance. Its benchmark scores span rendering, math, and compression workloads, all recorded in the database, and its 86th percentile ranking places it well above the Core Ultra 7 155HL's 50th percentile. The i9-14901E's higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz and larger 36 MB L3 cache provide a clear path to strong single-threaded and multi-threaded results. The Core Ultra 7 155HL, with no benchmark scores recorded, offers no measurable evidence of performance in the database.

The Core Ultra 7 155HL does present advantages in specific areas. Its 16 cores and 22 threads exceed the i9-14901E's 8 cores and 16 threads, which could benefit workloads that scale with core count, though no benchmark data confirms this. Its 7 nm process node is smaller than the i9-14901E's 10 nm node, and its 45 TDP is lower, suggesting better power efficiency. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics may outperform the UHD Graphics 770 in certain tasks, though no benchmarks verify this. The launch MSRP of $438 for the Core Ultra 7 155HL provides a reference point, but the i9-14901E has no such figure.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901E wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its Cinebench scores, including R23 multi-core of 25753 and single-core of 3635, demonstrate strength in rendering and simulation. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 30298 and single-thread score of 4354 confirm versatility across parallel and sequential workloads. Specific tasks like data compression at 288777 and integer math at 112736 indicate productivity and scientific computing capability. The i9-14901E is the choice for users who rely on measured performance data from the database.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL wins in structural specifications. Its higher core count of 16 and thread count of 22 provide theoretical headroom for heavily threaded applications, though no benchmark results confirm this advantage. Its lower TDP of 45 suggests suitability for power-constrained environments. Its 7 nm process node indicates a newer manufacturing technology. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is recorded, while the i9-14901E's is not. Its integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics may offer better visual output, but this remains unverified. The Core Ultra 7 155HL suits users who prioritize core count, efficiency, and connectivity options such as Gen 4 PCIe, though they must accept the absence of benchmark evidence in the database.