Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14901E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Core i9-14901E
The Verdict
The Intel Core i9-14900F is the dominant processor in this comparison. Benchmark data records 16 wins for the i9-14900F against just 1 win for the i9-14901E. The i9-14900F holds a 58.3% higher average benchmark score (60008 versus 37911) and sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile. The single win for the i9-14901E comes in PassMark physics, where it scores 3041 against 2899, a 4.7% advantage.
For workloads that scale with core count and thread count, the i9-14900F is the clear choice. Its 24 cores and 32 threads give it a structural advantage that shows up consistently across Cinebench and PassMark multithreaded tests. The i9-14901E, with 8 cores and 16 threads, is suited for scenarios where the PassMark physics result matters most, or where its integrated UHD Graphics 770 is required, since the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics.
Where Each One Wins
The i9-14900F wins every Cinebench test by exactly 53.6%. This includes R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multi-core variants. The consistency of this delta across all Cinebench tests indicates a fixed performance gap that applies regardless of workload type. The i9-14900F also wins PassMark multithread by 53.6%, matching the Cinebench pattern exactly.
The i9-14900F shows its largest advantage in PassMark data compression, scoring 564207 against 288777, a 95.4% lead. Data encryption follows with an 86.5% advantage (34644 versus 18571). Extended instructions show an 80.2% gap (31084 versus 17249). Random string sorting is 62.8% ahead (63728 versus 39138). Integer math is 57.1% ahead (177066 versus 112736). Floating point math is 47.4% ahead (119550 versus 81089).
The i9-14901E wins only PassMark physics, with a 4.7% edge. This is the sole benchmark where the 8-core processor outperforms the 24-core part, and the margin is small.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and both belong to the Core 14th Gen series. Both use the Intel 10 nm process node with a 257 mm² die size. Both are built on Intel Socket 1700 and carry the same 65 W TDP.
The core configuration differs substantially. The i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. This is the primary architectural distinction between the two parts. The i9-14900F has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The i9-14901E has a higher base clock of 2.80 GHz but a lower boost clock of 5.60 GHz.
Cache structures are identical on paper: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU for both.
The integrated graphics differ. The i9-14901E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics. The i9-14900F was released on 2024-01-07, and the i9-14901E followed on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The i9-14900F carries part number SRN3W, while the i9-14901E carries Q49ESRNJH.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900F boosts to 5.80 GHz, which is higher than the i9-14901E's 5.60 GHz boost. The i9-14901E has a higher base clock at 2.80 GHz compared to 2.00 GHz on the i9-14900F.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Intel Core i9-14900F and the Intel Core i9-14901E support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.
Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.
Q: Which processor ranks higher among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900F sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile. The i9-14900F also has a higher average benchmark score of 60008 versus 37911.
Q: Is there any benchmark where the i9-14901E wins?
A: Yes, the i9-14901E wins PassMark physics with a score of 3041 against 2899 for the i9-14900F, a 4.7% advantage. This is the only recorded win for the i9-14901E out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Cinebench results show a uniform pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i9-14900F scores 3986 against 2595. In R15 single-core, it scores 562 against 366. R20 multi-core shows 16611 against 10816, and R20 single-core shows 2344 against 1526. R23 multi-core shows 39551 against 25753, and R23 single-core shows 5583 against 3635. Every Cinebench test records a 53.6% delta in favor of the i9-14900F.
PassMark multithread results mirror this exactly. The i9-14900F scores 46532 against 30298, again a 53.6% delta. This consistent delta across both Cinebench and PassMark multithread suggests the performance ratio is stable across different multithreaded rendering and compute workloads.
The largest margins appear in data-intensive PassMark tests. Data compression shows the i9-14900F at 564207 versus 288777, a 95.4% lead. This nearly doubles the output of the i9-14901E in compression workloads. Data encryption shows 34644 versus 18571, an 86.5% lead. Extended instructions show 31084 versus 17249, an 80.2% lead. Random string sorting shows 63728 versus 39138, a 62.8% lead.
Integer math shows 177066 versus 112736, a 57.1% lead. Floating point math shows 119550 versus 81089, a 47.4% lead. Prime number finding shows the smallest multi-core delta at 10.6%, with scores of 209 versus 189. Single-thread performance shows a modest 3.5% lead for the i9-14900F in PassMark single-thread tests, scoring 4506 versus 4354.
The PassMark physics result is the outlier. The i9-14901E scores 3041 against 2899, a 4.7% advantage. This is the only head-to-head benchmark where the i9-14901E records a win, and it does so despite having fewer cores and threads.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core i9-14900F | Intel Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.80 GHz | 5.60 GHz |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |
| Part Number | SRN3W | Q49ESRNJH |
| Launch MSRP | $524 | null |
Both processors share identical specifications in several areas: 65 W TDP, Intel Socket 1700, Raptor Lake architecture with Raptor Lake-R codename, 10 nm process node, 257 mm² die size, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 36 MB shared L3, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, desktop market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.
The i9-14901E has a higher base clock by 0.80 GHz, but the i9-14900F has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz. The i9-14901E provides integrated graphics where the i9-14900F does not. The i9-14900F has a launch MSRP of $524, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i9-14901E.