CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2246G and Intel Core i9-10900TE are two very different processors that land close together in aggregate performance, yet their individual characteristics point them toward entirely different use cases. The Xeon E-2246G is a 6-core, 12-thread Coffee Lake-S WS part aimed at server and workstation duty, while the i9-10900TE is a 10-core, 20-thread Comet Lake desktop chip with an extremely low power envelope. Benchmark data shows a consistent, though narrow, edge for the i9-10900TE across every tested workload, but the Xeon counters with features the desktop chip lacks entirely.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous: the Intel Core i9-10900TE wins all six benchmark comparisons. However, the margins are consistently small, ranging from 2.6% to 2.9% in favor of the i9-10900TE. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i9-10900TE scores 1213 against the Xeon E-2246G’s 1181, a delta of -2.6%. The single-core test in the same suite shows a similar gap: 171 versus 166, or -2.9%. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20, where the i9-10900TE posts 5058 multi-core and 714 single-core, compared to 4922 and 694 for the Xeon E-2246G, representing -2.7% and -2.8% deltas respectively.

The most recent rendering workload, Cinebench R23, continues the trend. The i9-10900TE scores 12045 multi-core and 1700 single-core, while the Xeon E-2246G manages 11720 and 1654. Both deltas sit at -2.7%. Notably, the i9-10900TE’s advantage is remarkably stable across all tests, suggesting a fundamental per-clock or efficiency edge rather than a workload-specific anomaly. The Xeon E-2246G does appear in Geekbench results within its own benchmark list, 5988 multi-core and 1613 single-core, but no head-to-head Geekbench comparison is provided in the data, so those numbers cannot be directly contrasted.

The aggregate picture reinforces this narrow gap. The Xeon E-2246G holds an average benchmark score of 3492 across all tests, while the i9-10900TE sits at 3484. In the nearest rivals list, the i9-10900TE is shown as a rival to the Xeon with a deltaPct of 0.2%, meaning the Xeon is marginally ahead in the overall average. Yet in direct head-to-head Cinebench testing, the i9-10900TE wins every round. This apparent contradiction is explained by the fact that the Xeon’s average includes Geekbench scores, which are absent from the head-to-head set, and by the extremely tight overall margins, both chips sit within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-9900T and Intel Xeon D-1732TE in the same rivalry cluster.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-10900TE wins every benchmark category where direct comparison data exists. That includes multi-threaded rendering tasks in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as single-threaded variants of those same tests. The largest single margin is a 2.9% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core, which is a modest but consistent lead. For users prioritizing raw Cinebench throughput, the i9-10900TE is the clear choice, since it outperforms the Xeon E-2246G in both parallel and single-threaded rendering workloads.

The Intel Xeon E-2246G, despite losing all head-to-head tests, holds advantages in areas that do not appear in the Cinebench suite. It supports ECC memory, a feature entirely absent from the i9-10900TE’s specification list. Its integrated graphics is the HD Graphics P630, whereas the i9-10900TE uses UHD Graphics 630, a difference that may matter for specific software stacks. The Xeon also targets the Server/Workstation market segment, while the i9-10900TE is classified as Desktop. The data shows no benchmark wins for the Xeon, but its feature set, particularly ECC support and workstation positioning, defines its winning territory outside of raw Cinebench scores.

Geekbench results further distinguish the Xeon, though only its own scores are listed. The Xeon E-2246G achieves 5988 multi-core and 1613 single-core in Geekbench, which are the highest scores in its own benchmark table. Without a direct Geekbench comparison to the i9-10900TE, these numbers cannot be used for a head-to-head claim, but they do indicate that the Xeon’s performance profile is not limited to Cinebench; it delivers competitive results in general-purpose CPU benchmarks as well.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a 14 nm process node and both are manufactured by Intel, but they diverge significantly in core configuration and platform. The Xeon E-2246G uses the Coffee Lake architecture with the codename Coffee Lake-S WS, fitting into the Xeon E-2200 series. It packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The i9-10900TE is built on Comet Lake, belongs to the Core 10th Gen family, and offers 10 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock is listed as 1800.00 MHz (1.80 GHz), with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The i9-10900TE thus trades a much lower base frequency for a 4-core and 8-thread advantage.

Cache hierarchies differ accordingly. The Xeon E-2246G has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, plus 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-10900TE matches the per-core L1 and L2 sizes but nearly doubles the shared L3 to 20 MB. Die size also reflects the core count difference: the Xeon measures 154 mm², while the i9-10900TE is larger at 206 mm². Power consumption is a stark contrast. The Xeon E-2246G has a TDP of 80 W, while the i9-10900TE is rated at just 35 W, making it an exceptionally power-efficient part for its core count.

Platform support separates them further. The Xeon E-2246G uses Intel Socket 1151, while the i9-10900TE requires Intel Socket 1200. Both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but memory bandwidth differs: the Xeon lists 42.7 GB/s versus 46.9 GB/s for the i9-10900TE. PCIe support is identical at Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is supported on the Xeon E-2246G but not on the i9-10900TE. The Xeon’s integrated graphics is HD Graphics P630, while the i9-10900TE carries UHD Graphics 630. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data directs different buyers toward different chips. For rendering workloads measured by Cinebench, the Intel Core i9-10900TE is the stronger performer, winning all six head-to-head tests with margins between 2.6% and 2.9%. Its 10-core, 20-thread configuration and 20 MB of L3 cache deliver a consistent edge in both multi-core and single-core scenarios. The i9-10900TE also does this at a 35 W TDP, which is less than half the Xeon E-2246G’s 80 W rating. For desktop users who prioritize Cinebench throughput and power efficiency, the i9-10900TE is the data-supported choice.

The Intel Xeon E-2246G is the pick for workstation or server environments where ECC memory is a requirement. That feature is absent from the i9-10900TE and cannot be compensated by raw performance. The Xeon also fits the Server/Workstation market segment, uses the older Socket 1151 platform, and has a smaller die at 154 mm². Its higher base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost of 4.80 GHz may benefit latency-sensitive workloads, though the benchmark data does not provide direct evidence for that. The Xeon’s average benchmark score of 3492 edges out the i9-10900TE’s 3484, but that aggregate is heavily influenced by Geekbench results that lack a head-to-head counterpart. In the nearest rivals list, the Xeon E-2246G and i9-10900TE are separated by just 0.2%, indicating near-parity in overall performance.

Strictly from the data, the i9-10900TE wins on every measured benchmark, while the Xeon E-2246G wins on platform features. The i9-10900TE is active in production status, whereas the Xeon E-2246G is end-of-life, which may factor into long-term availability. The launch MSRP for the Xeon E-2246G is $311, while the i9-10900TE launched at $488; this price difference is notable but not a performance metric.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900TE wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with deltas ranging from -2.6% to -2.9% against the Intel Xeon E-2246G.

Q: What is the core and thread difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i9-10900TE has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2246G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i9-10900TE does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do their power ratings compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G has a TDP of 80 W, while the Intel Core i9-10900TE has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: What are their L3 cache sizes?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core i9-10900TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i9-10900TE’s boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2246G | Intel Core i9-10900TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 1800.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 80 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake |

| Die Size | 154 mm² | 206 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2020-04-29 |

| Launch MSRP | $311 | $488 |

| Part Number | SRF7G | SRJFC |