CPU Comparison

The Intel Core i9-10885H and the Intel Xeon E-2276G are both end-of-life Intel parts built on the same 14 nm process, yet they target completely different market segments: one is a mobile powerhouse, the other a server/workstation processor. Benchmark data shows the i9-10885H takes seven of eight head-to-head tests, but the single test it loses is a decisive one, revealing a clear divergence in intended workloads. The average benchmark scores are close, 3651 for the i9-10885H against 3614 for the Xeon E-2276G, and both sit at the 55th percentile among all CPUs, yet the distribution of wins tells a story of compute-heavy parallelism versus single-thread responsiveness.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-10885H dominates in almost every multi-threaded and multi-core benchmark. Its largest victory comes in Geekbench multicore, where it scores 6764 against the Xeon E-2276G’s 6551, a delta of 3.3%. Across the Cinebench suite, the i9-10885H consistently edges ahead: it wins R15 multicore (1219 vs 1205, 1.2%), R20 multicore (5082 vs 5021, 1.2%), and R23 multicore (12102 vs 11957, 1.2%). This pattern is directly attributable to its core count advantage, 8 cores and 16 threads versus the Xeon’s 6 cores and 12 threads, which pays off in any workload that scales with parallel execution. The i9-10885H also wins the single-core Cinebench tests, though by narrower margins: R15 single (172 vs 169, 1.8%), R20 single (717 vs 708, 1.3%), and R23 single (1708 vs 1688, 1.2%).

The Intel Xeon E-2276G’s sole victory is in Geekbench single-core, where it scores 1610 against the i9-10885H’s 1447, a substantial 10.1% delta. This is the largest performance gap in either direction across all benchmarks. The Xeon’s higher base clock of 3.80 GHz (versus 2.40 GHz) and boost clock of 4.90 GHz (versus 5.30 GHz) do not fully explain this; rather, the Geekbench single-core test appears to reward the Xeon’s architecture in a way that Cinebench does not. For tasks that depend on a single thread, legacy software, certain scripting workloads, or lightly threaded applications, the Xeon E-2276G is clearly the stronger choice, despite losing every other benchmark.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel’s 14 nm process and share the same L1 cache structure of 64 KB per core and L2 cache of 256 KB per core. The fundamental architecture split is in core topology: the i9-10885H uses Comet Lake-H (8 cores, 16 threads) with a shared 16 MB L3 cache, while the Xeon E-2276G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (6 cores, 12 threads) with a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The i9-10885H’s larger die size of 206 mm² reflects its extra cores, compared to the Xeon’s 154 mm² die. Both support DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus, but the i9-10885H has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Xeon.

The most significant architectural divergence is ECC memory support. The Xeon E-2276G supports ECC memory, while the i9-10885H does not. This is a defining feature for the server/workstation market segment, where data integrity is paramount. The Xeon also features HD Graphics P630 integrated graphics, while the i9-10885H uses UHD Graphics 630. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The i9-10885H is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1440 socket, while the Xeon E-2276G is a server/workstation part on Intel Socket 1151. The i9-10885H has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Xeon E-2276G draws 80 watts, a difference that reflects the mobile versus desktop/server power envelope, though the Xeon’s higher TDP does not translate into better benchmark results except in Geekbench single-core.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is Geekbench single-core, where the Xeon E-2276G wins by 10.1% (1610 vs 1447). This is not a marginal edge; it is a substantial gap that suggests the Xeon’s architecture handles single-threaded integer and floating-point workloads differently. No other benchmark comes close to this margin. The i9-10885H’s largest win is Geekbench multicore at 3.3% (6764 vs 6551), which is more than double its Cinebench multicore margins. The Cinebench results are remarkably consistent: the i9-10885H wins R15, R20, and R23 multicore by 1.2% each, and the single-core versions by 1.2% to 1.8%. This consistency indicates that the Cinebench workload is balanced between the two CPUs’ core counts and clock speeds, with the i9-10885H’s extra cores providing a small but reliable advantage.

The Geekbench multicore delta of 3.3% is the outlier, suggesting that Geekbench’s multicore test scales better with the i9-10885H’s 8-core setup than Cinebench does. Conversely, the Geekbench single-core delta of -10.1% is the Xeon’s clear statement. The average benchmark scores confirm the near-parity: the i9-10885H averages 3651, while the Xeon E-2276G averages 3614. The nearest rivals give context: the i9-10885H sits within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 7251 and Intel Core i3-13100E, while the Xeon E-2276G is within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E and 0.2% of the Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3. Both processors are firmly in the same performance tier, despite the i9-10885H’s benchmark win count of 7 versus the Xeon’s 1.

The Verdict

For multi-core productivity, rendering, and any parallel compute workload, the Intel Core i9-10885H is the data-backed choice. It wins all four Cinebench multicore tests and Geekbench multicore, with deltas ranging from 1.2% to 3.3%. Its 8-core/16-thread configuration and 16 MB L3 cache provide a tangible, if modest, edge over the Xeon’s 6-core/12-thread design. The i9-10885H also wins all three Cinebench single-core tests, meaning it is not merely a multicore specialist; it is generally faster in rendering workloads across the board.

The Intel Xeon E-2276G earns its place for single-thread-sensitive applications. Its 10.1% Geekbench single-core victory is the single largest performance gap in this comparison, and it is the only benchmark where the Xeon leads. For users running legacy single-threaded software or workloads that cannot utilize more than one or two cores, the Xeon E-2276G will deliver noticeably better responsiveness. Additionally, the Xeon’s ECC memory support is a critical feature for data integrity in server and workstation environments, something the i9-10885H cannot offer. The Xeon’s lower launch MSRP of $362 (versus the i9-10885H’s $556) is a secondary consideration, but the primary decision rests on whether single-thread performance and ECC outweigh the i9-10885H’s multicore lead.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H wins 7 out of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests and Geekbench multicore. The Intel Xeon E-2276G wins only Geekbench single-core.

Q: How big is the Xeon E-2276G’s single-core advantage?

A: In Geekbench single-core, the Xeon E-2276G scores 1610 versus the i9-10885H’s 1447, a delta of 10.1%. This is the largest performance difference in either direction among all benchmarks tested.

Q: Do the two processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Xeon E-2276G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i9-10885H does not. This is a key differentiator for server and workstation reliability.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The i9-10885H also has a larger shared L3 cache of 16 MB versus 12 MB.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has an average benchmark score of 3651, while the Intel Xeon E-2276G averages 3614. Both sit at the 55th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Xeon E-2276G’s 4.90 GHz. However, the Xeon has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 2.40 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i9-10885H | Intel Xeon E-2276G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.30 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 80 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Coffee Lake |

| Codename | Comet Lake-H | Coffee Lake-S WS |

| Die Size | 206 mm² | 154 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Launch MSRP | $556 | $362 |