Intel Core i7-9700KF vs Intel Core i9-10885H Comparison
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Core i9-10885H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i7-9700KF vs Intel Core i9-10885H
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head data presents an unusual picture: two processors from different market segments that are nearly inseparable in Cinebench rendering tests, yet clearly separated in Geekbench. The Intel Core i7-9700KF takes 7 of the 8 recorded benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core i9-10885H manages a single win, and that win is by the narrowest possible margin.
In Cinebench R15 multicore, both chips record an identical score of 1219. The single-core result is also a dead heat at 172 points. Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern repeats: both score 5082 in multicore and 717 in single-core. These are not rounding artifacts; the recorded data shows exact parity across four consecutive tests. The only Cinebench divergence appears in R23 multicore, where the i9-10885H edges ahead with 12102 against the i7-9700KF's 12100, a delta of just 0.0 percent. In R23 single-core, both return 1708.
The Geekbench results tell a different story, and this is where the i7-9700KF establishes its dominance. In Geekbench multicore, the i7-9700KF scores 7620 against the i9-10885H's 6764, a 12.7 percent advantage. The single-core Geekbench gap is even larger: 1681 versus 1447, a 16.2 percent lead for the desktop part. These deltas are substantial enough that they outweigh the near-identical Cinebench figures when considering overall performance.
The aggregate benchmark score reinforces the split. The i7-9700KF averages 3787 across all tests, while the i9-10885H averages 3651. That places the i7-9700KF at the 56th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with the i9-10885H just behind at the 55th percentile. The nearest rivals for the i7-9700KF include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 (delta 0.3 percent), Intel Core i5-1245U (delta 0.3 percent), Intel Core i7-8086K (delta -0.3 percent), and AMD Ryzen 9 4900H (delta -0.9 percent). The i9-10885H sits alongside the Intel Xeon E5-2658A v3 (delta -0.2 percent), Intel Xeon E5-1681 v3 (delta 0.2 percent), Intel Core i3-13100E (delta -0.5 percent), and AMD EPYC 7251 (delta -0.6 percent).
Where Each One Wins
The i7-9700KF wins decisively in Geekbench workloads, both single-threaded and multi-threaded. A 16.2 percent lead in single-core Geekbench indicates that the desktop chip's higher base clock and boost behavior translate into faster response times for latency-sensitive tasks. The 12.7 percent multicore Geekbench lead suggests that, despite both chips having 8 physical cores, the i7-9700KF's scheduling and clock management deliver better throughput in general-purpose parallel workloads as measured by Geekbench.
The i9-10885H wins the Cinebench R23 multicore test, albeit by a hair: 12102 versus 12100. This is a single point of victory, and the delta is recorded as 0.0 percent. In practical terms, the two processors are equivalent in this rendering workload. The i9-10885H also brings 16 threads against the i7-9700KF's 8 threads, yet this thread advantage does not produce a meaningful Cinebench R23 multicore win. That is a notable finding: hyper-threading on the i9-10885H does not overcome the i7-9700KF's higher clocks in rendering.
For users who prioritize single-threaded responsiveness, the i7-9700KF is the clear choice based on Geekbench single-core. For users who run Cinebench-style rendering loops, the two are functionally tied, with the i9-10885H holding only a symbolic lead. The i7-9700KF's wins are consistent and often large; the i9-10885H's single win is negligible in magnitude.
The Verdict
The data points to the Intel Core i7-9700KF as the stronger overall performer. It wins 7 of 8 head-to-head comparisons, including the two Geekbench tests by margins of 12.7 percent and 16.2 percent. Its average benchmark score of 3787 exceeds the i9-10885H's 3651 by roughly 3.7 percent. The percentile ranking also favors the desktop part: 56th versus 55th.
However, the choice is not purely about raw performance. The i9-10885H is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, while the i7-9700KF is a desktop part with a 95 W TDP. The i9-10885H's lower power envelope makes it suitable for laptops, whereas the i7-9700KF requires a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1151) and a dedicated cooling solution. The i7-9700KF has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The i9-10885H includes UHD Graphics 630, which allows for basic display output without a separate graphics card.
For a desktop builder who already owns a discrete GPU, the i7-9700KF is the better pick: it wins the majority of benchmarks and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. For a mobile user who needs an 8-core processor in a laptop chassis, the i9-10885H is the only option between the two, given its BGA 1440 socket and integrated graphics. The i9-10885H also has a larger L3 cache (16 MB versus 12 MB) and supports 16 threads, which may help in specific multi-threaded applications that are not captured by the Geekbench multicore result.
The verdict is straightforward: the i7-9700KF wins on performance, while the i9-10885H wins on mobility and integrated graphics capability.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i9-10885H boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-9700KF boosts to 4.90 GHz.
Q: Do the two processors differ in thread count?
A: Yes. The i7-9700KF has 8 threads, while the i9-10885H has 16 threads. Both have 8 physical cores.
Q: Which chip performs better in Geekbench single-core?
A: The i7-9700KF scores 1681 versus 1447 for the i9-10885H, a 16.2 percent advantage.
Q: Is the i9-10885H faster in any benchmark?
A: Yes, in Cinebench R23 multicore, the i9-10885H scores 12102 against 12100 for the i7-9700KF, a delta of 0.0 percent.
Q: Does the i7-9700KF have integrated graphics?
A: No. The i7-9700KF has no integrated graphics unit. The i9-10885H includes UHD Graphics 630.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?
A: The i7-9700KF averages 3787, and the i9-10885H averages 3651.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different Intel microarchitectures. The i7-9700KF is built on Coffee Lake, specifically the Coffee Lake Refresh generation, while the i9-10885H uses Comet Lake-H. Both are fabricated on Intel's 14 nm process node, but the die sizes differ: the i7-9700KF measures 180.3 mm², and the i9-10885H measures 206 mm².
The cache hierarchies diverge in L3 capacity. The i7-9700KF has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i9-10885H has 16 MB. L1 and L2 caches are identical at 64 KB per core and 256 KB per core, respectively. The larger L3 on the i9-10885H may help with data reuse in certain workloads, but the benchmark data does not show a consistent advantage from it.
The memory controller also differs in bandwidth. The i7-9700KF supports dual-channel DDR4 with a peak bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the i9-10885H supports dual-channel DDR4 at 46.9 GB/s. Both have 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. Neither supports ECC memory.
The i7-9700KF has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable, while the i9-10885H is locked. The i7-9700KF is a desktop part for Intel Socket 1151, and the i9-10885H is a mobile part for Intel BGA 1440. The i9-10885H includes integrated UHD Graphics 630; the i7-9700KF has no integrated graphics.
Specification Differences
The key specification differences between the two parts are as follows:
- Threads: The i7-9700KF has 8 threads; the i9-10885H has 16 threads.
- Base clock: The i7-9700KF runs at 3.60 GHz; the i9-10885H runs at 2.40 GHz.
- Boost clock: The i7-9700KF boosts to 4.90 GHz; the i9-10885H boosts to 5.30 GHz.
- TDP: The i7-9700KF is rated at 95 W; the i9-10885H is rated at 45 W.
- Socket: The i7-9700KF uses Intel Socket 1151; the i9-10885H uses Intel BGA 1440.
- Architecture: The i7-9700KF is Coffee Lake; the i9-10885H is Comet Lake.
- Die size: The i7-9700KF is 180.3 mm²; the i9-10885H is 206 mm².
- L3 cache: The i7-9700KF has 12 MB shared; the i9-10885H has 16 MB shared.
- Memory bandwidth: The i7-9700KF has 42.7 GB/s; the i9-10885H has 46.9 GB/s.
- Integrated graphics: The i7-9700KF has none; the i9-10885H has UHD Graphics 630.
- Market segment: The i7-9700KF is desktop; the i9-10885H is mobile.
- Multiplier: The i7-9700KF is unlocked; the i9-10885H is locked.
- Launch MSRP: The i7-9700KF was $374; the i9-10885H was $556.
- Release date: The i7-9700KF launched in January 2019; the i9-10885H launched in April 2020.
- Part number: The i7-9700KF is SRG16SRFAC; the i9-10885H is SRJ8J.