Intel Core i7-9700E vs Intel Xeon E-2374G Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Xeon E-2374G across all six shared Cinebench tests. The Xeon wins every head-to-head comparison, though the margins are consistent rather than dramatic. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon E-2374G scores 1142 against 1069 for the Core i7-9700E, a 6.8% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a slightly larger gap: 161 versus 150, a 7.3% lead.

The pattern repeats across the newer Cinebench versions. In R20 multicore, the Xeon scores 4760 versus 4457, again a 6.8% delta. The R20 single-core result is 672 against 629, also 6.8%. R23 multicore shows 11335 versus 10613, and R23 single-core shows 1600 versus 1498. Both are 6.8% differences. The consistency of these deltas across all tests suggests a fundamental clock or architectural advantage rather than workload-specific behavior.

The Core i7-9700E does have one benchmark in the database that the Xeon lacks: Geekbench results. It scores 5661 multicore and 1497 singlecore. However, because there is no corresponding Geekbench score recorded for the Xeon E-2374G, a direct comparison cannot be made from the data. The Xeon's average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 3278, while the Core i7-9700E averages 3197. Both processors sit at the 53rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they occupy a similar overall performance tier.

The Xeon's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i3-12100T at 3277 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 at 3277 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-11500T at 3288 (-0.3% delta), and the Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 at 3265 (0.4% delta). The Core i7-9700E's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i3-13100T at 3198 (0% delta), the Intel Xeon E-2136 at 3193 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-1240P at 3202 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Atom P5342 at 3217 (-0.6% delta). These rival comparisons place both chips in similar company, though the Xeon's average score is roughly 2.5% higher.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2374G wins every multi-core Cinebench test. It scores 1142 in R15, 4760 in R20, and 11335 in R23, versus 1069, 4457, and 10613 for the Core i7-9700E. Each multi-core delta is 6.8% in favor of the Xeon.

Q: Is the single-core performance gap different from multi-core?

A: The single-core deltas are similar but not identical. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 7.3% advantage for the Xeon (161 versus 150), while R20 and R23 single-core tests both show 6.8% advantages (672 versus 629, and 1600 versus 1498 respectively).

Q: Does the Core i7-9700E have any benchmark where it wins?

A: No. The head-to-head data records six wins for the Xeon E-2374G and zero wins for the Core i7-9700E. However, the Core i7-9700E does have Geekbench results (5661 multicore, 1497 singlecore) that are not shared with the Xeon, so those cannot be compared directly.

Q: How do these processors compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Xeon E-2374G averages 3278, with its closest rival the Intel Core i5-11500T at 3288, a 0.3% gap. The Core i7-9700E averages 3197, with its closest rival the Intel Core i3-13100T at 3198, a 0% delta. Both sit at the 53rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Xeon E-2374G has an 80 TDP, while the Core i7-9700E has a 65 TDP. The Xeon draws more power despite having fewer cores and threads, consistent with its higher clock speeds.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Xeon E-2374G supports ECC memory, while the Core i7-9700E does not. This is a key differentiator for the Xeon's server/workstation positioning.

The Verdict

The data points clearly to the Intel Xeon E-2374G as the faster processor in every measurable shared benchmark. It wins all six Cinebench tests, with deltas ranging from 6.8% to 7.3%. The Xeon achieves this with 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700E has 8 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon's higher base clock (3.70 GHz versus 2.60 GHz) and boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.40 GHz) appear to overcome the Core i7's core count advantage.

The Core i7-9700E is not without merit. It carries a lower 65 TDP compared to the Xeon's 80, and it has a larger 12 MB shared L3 cache versus 8 MB. Its Geekbench scores, while not directly comparable, show a reasonably strong showing at 5661 multicore and 1497 singlecore. However, in the Cinebench tests where both are measured, the Xeon leads consistently.

For buyers choosing between these two, the Xeon E-2374G is the performance pick based on recorded benchmarks. Its ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 4 interface also position it for server or workstation duties. The Core i7-9700E, with its lower TDP and end-of-life production status, appears more suited to desktop use where power draw matters more than raw Cinebench output. The Xeon's launch MSRP is $334, while the Core i7-9700E's launch MSRP is $323.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The Xeon E-2374G uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700E uses 8 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon has no hyper-threading advantage; both have 8 threads total. Base clocks are 3.70 GHz for the Xeon and 2.60 GHz for the Core i7. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz and 4.40 GHz respectively.

TDP ratings differ: the Xeon is 80, the Core i7 is 65. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 1200, while the Core i7 uses Intel Socket 1151. Cache configurations differ notably. The Xeon has 80 KB L1 per core and 512 KB L2 per core, while the Core i7 has 64 KB L1 per core and 256 KB L2 per core. L3 cache is 8 MB shared on the Xeon versus 12 MB shared on the Core i7.

Memory bandwidth differs: the Xeon supports 51.2 GB/s, the Core i7 supports 42.7 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the Xeon but not on the Core i7. PCIe capabilities differ: the Xeon uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i7 uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics P750 on the Xeon and UHD Graphics 630 on the Core i7.

The Xeon targets the Server/Workstation market segment and remains in Active production, while the Core i7 targets Desktop and is End-of-life. Release dates differ: the Xeon launched on 2021-09-07, the Core i7 on 2019-04-22. Die sizes are 276 mm² for the Xeon and 180.3 mm² for the Core i7. Part numbers are SRKN3 for the Xeon and SRGDX for the Core i7.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's 14 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel. The Xeon E-2374G is built on Rocket Lake architecture, specifically the Rocket Lake-E codename, from the Xeon E-2300 series. The Core i7-9700E uses Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake Refresh codename, from the Core i7 generation.

The Xeon is a 4-core, 8-thread part with per-core L1 of 80 KB and per-core L2 of 512 KB. Its 8 MB shared L3 is smaller than the Core i7's 12 MB shared L3. The Core i7 is an 8-core, 8-thread part with per-core L1 of 64 KB and per-core L2 of 256 KB. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Xeon's integrated graphics are UHD Graphics P750, versus UHD Graphics 630 on the Core i7. The Xeon supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core i7 also supports DDR4 on dual-channel but at 42.7 GB/s. ECC memory is a Xeon-only feature in this comparison.

The Xeon's PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes, a newer and wider interface than the Core i7's Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The Xeon's memory bandwidth advantage of 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s aligns with its higher boost clock and Rocket Lake architecture. The Core i7's larger L3 cache and higher core count suggest a design focused on parallel throughput, but the recorded benchmarks show the Xeon's higher clocks win out in Cinebench workloads.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the Intel Xeon E-2374G wins in every shared test category. It leads in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both multicore and singlecore. The 6.8% multicore advantage across all three versions indicates that the Xeon's 4-core, 8-thread configuration with 5.00 GHz boost outperforms the Core i7-9700E's 8-core, 8-thread configuration with 4.40 GHz boost in these rendering workloads.

The Xeon also wins on platform features that matter for specific use cases. Its ECC memory support is critical for error-sensitive server or workstation tasks. The PCIe Gen 4, 20-lane interface provides more bandwidth for modern GPUs or NVMe storage. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is 20% higher than the Core i7's 42.7 GB/s, which can benefit memory-intensive applications.

The Core i7-9700E does not win any recorded benchmark, but its profile suggests strengths in specific scenarios. The 65 TDP means lower power consumption, which matters in thermally constrained desktop builds or always-on systems. The 12 MB shared L3 cache is 50% larger than the Xeon's 8 MB, which could benefit workloads with high cache reuse. The Geekbench scores of 5661 multicore and 1497 singlecore, while not comparable to the Xeon, do indicate respectable absolute performance.

For users prioritizing raw Cinebench rendering performance, ECC memory, or PCIe Gen 4 connectivity, the Xeon E-2374G is the clear choice. For users prioritizing lower power draw, larger L3 cache, or a desktop-oriented platform, the Core i7-9700E has qualitative advantages, though these are not reflected in the head-to-head benchmark wins. The data shows the Xeon winning all six recorded comparisons, making it the benchmark leader without qualification.